<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trivial Disputes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/2005/12/trivial-disputes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/12/trivial-disputes/</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:24:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: iphone revolution</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/12/trivial-disputes/comment-page-1/#comment-30461</link>
		<dc:creator>iphone revolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 08:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=197#comment-30461</guid>
		<description>&lt;a title=&quot;iphone wireless&quot; href=&quot;http://www.iphonerevolution.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;iphone wireless&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a title=&quot;iphone&quot; href=&quot;http://www.iphonerevolution.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;iphone&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a title=&quot;Apple iphone&quot; href=&quot;http://www.iphonerevolution.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Apple iphone&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="iphone wireless" href="http://www.iphonerevolution.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>iphone wireless</strong></a></p>
<p><a title="iphone" href="http://www.iphonerevolution.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>iphone</strong></a></p>
<p><a title="Apple iphone" href="http://www.iphonerevolution.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>Apple iphone</strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wayscj</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/12/trivial-disputes/comment-page-1/#comment-29142</link>
		<dc:creator>wayscj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=197#comment-29142</guid>
		<description>ed hardy &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy clothing &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy clothing&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy clothing&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy shop &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy shop&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy shop&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
christian audigier &lt;a title=&quot;christian audigier&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;christian audigier&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy cheap &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy cheap&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy cheap&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy outlet &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy outlet&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy outlet&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy sale &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy clothes&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy sale&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy store &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy store&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy store&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy mens &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy mens&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk/mens.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy mens&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy womens &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy womens&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk/womens.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy womens&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy kids &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy kids&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk/kids.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy kids&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ed hardy kids</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ed hardy <a title="ed hardy" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy</strong></a><br />
ed hardy clothing <a title="ed hardy clothing" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy clothing</strong></a><br />
ed hardy shop <a title="ed hardy shop" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy shop</strong></a><br />
christian audigier <a title="christian audigier" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>christian audigier</strong></a><br />
ed hardy cheap <a title="ed hardy cheap" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy cheap</strong></a><br />
ed hardy outlet <a title="ed hardy outlet" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy outlet</strong></a><br />
ed hardy sale <a title="ed hardy clothes" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy sale</strong></a><br />
ed hardy store <a title="ed hardy store" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy store</strong></a><br />
ed hardy mens <a title="ed hardy mens" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk/mens.html" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy mens</strong></a><br />
ed hardy womens <a title="ed hardy womens" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk/womens.html" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy womens</strong></a><br />
ed hardy kids <a title="ed hardy kids" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk/kids.html" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy kids</strong></a> ed hardy kids</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Stahlhut</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/12/trivial-disputes/comment-page-1/#comment-1996</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Stahlhut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 20:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=197#comment-1996</guid>
		<description>Different individuals also have different tastes in food and drink, as well as different reasons for either drinking or avoiding alcohol.  I know quite a few people who have no moral or health objections to alcohol but can&#039;t stand the taste, so one thing I wondered is if some people who dislike the taste of alcohol might have a higher-than-average attraction to sugar, fats, or other high-calorie foods.  It might also be interesting to break down the &quot;drinking&quot; group by which alcoholic beverages they tend to choose -- in other words, does it matter if you prefer to drink dry white wine rather than liqueur-and-cream dessert drinks?

Not that it seems to matter to me; I drink in moderation and like just about every kind of food you can imagine, from tofu and bean sprouts to fettucine Alfredo.  Then again, I don&#039;t eat a lot of desserts.  Maybe I can tell myself that if I didn&#039;t drink wine and the occasional cocktail, I&#039;d be 50 pounds overweight instead of only 15.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Different individuals also have different tastes in food and drink, as well as different reasons for either drinking or avoiding alcohol.  I know quite a few people who have no moral or health objections to alcohol but can&#8217;t stand the taste, so one thing I wondered is if some people who dislike the taste of alcohol might have a higher-than-average attraction to sugar, fats, or other high-calorie foods.  It might also be interesting to break down the &#8220;drinking&#8221; group by which alcoholic beverages they tend to choose &#8212; in other words, does it matter if you prefer to drink dry white wine rather than liqueur-and-cream dessert drinks?</p>
<p>Not that it seems to matter to me; I drink in moderation and like just about every kind of food you can imagine, from tofu and bean sprouts to fettucine Alfredo.  Then again, I don&#8217;t eat a lot of desserts.  Maybe I can tell myself that if I didn&#8217;t drink wine and the occasional cocktail, I&#8217;d be 50 pounds overweight instead of only 15.  <img src='http://www.badscience.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne the mad scientist</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/12/trivial-disputes/comment-page-1/#comment-1729</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne the mad scientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=197#comment-1729</guid>
		<description>There is no doubt in my mind why this survey revealed that women who drink stay thin.  It was conducted on scientists.  I have to work four times as hard as my male colleges to receive a quarter of the recognition.  Little wonder that I weigh less than eight stone and drink like a fish...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no doubt in my mind why this survey revealed that women who drink stay thin.  It was conducted on scientists.  I have to work four times as hard as my male colleges to receive a quarter of the recognition.  Little wonder that I weigh less than eight stone and drink like a fish&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hatter</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/12/trivial-disputes/comment-page-1/#comment-1651</link>
		<dc:creator>Hatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 10:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=197#comment-1651</guid>
		<description>Expecting weight gain from moderate alcohol consumption assumes all other things remain equal.  Consider that when socialising you could be eating snacks, smoking a cigarette or sipping a drink.  Any one of those can give you something to do with your hands and provide an oral fix.  Chances are that snacking would give the highest caloric intake, smoking the lowest.

What would be absolutely hilarious is if they did this same survey amongst users of other recreational drugs.  The headline could be &#039;Study finds LSD consumption reduces the risk of obesity by 80%&#039;

John Coffin there is good reason why the * Anonymous groups are violently opposed to anyone assessing the efficacy of their method.  It wouldn&#039;t do for the general public to become aware of their monumental failure rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Expecting weight gain from moderate alcohol consumption assumes all other things remain equal.  Consider that when socialising you could be eating snacks, smoking a cigarette or sipping a drink.  Any one of those can give you something to do with your hands and provide an oral fix.  Chances are that snacking would give the highest caloric intake, smoking the lowest.</p>
<p>What would be absolutely hilarious is if they did this same survey amongst users of other recreational drugs.  The headline could be &#8216;Study finds LSD consumption reduces the risk of obesity by 80%&#8217;</p>
<p>John Coffin there is good reason why the * Anonymous groups are violently opposed to anyone assessing the efficacy of their method.  It wouldn&#8217;t do for the general public to become aware of their monumental failure rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter augustus</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/12/trivial-disputes/comment-page-1/#comment-1624</link>
		<dc:creator>peter augustus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=197#comment-1624</guid>
		<description>Surely the key factor is in the word moderate. The fact that someone is capable of moderating their alcohol intake makes it likely that they can also moderate their food intake. Heavy eaters get fat, heavy drinkers get fat and people that both eat and drink more calories than they can work off get fat. I know, I&#039;ve tried it all and shown that even running 50 miles a week won&#039;t make you thin if you eat and drink to excess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely the key factor is in the word moderate. The fact that someone is capable of moderating their alcohol intake makes it likely that they can also moderate their food intake. Heavy eaters get fat, heavy drinkers get fat and people that both eat and drink more calories than they can work off get fat. I know, I&#8217;ve tried it all and shown that even running 50 miles a week won&#8217;t make you thin if you eat and drink to excess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/12/trivial-disputes/comment-page-1/#comment-1584</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 07:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=197#comment-1584</guid>
		<description>Does this mean that there&#039;s some truth in the old joke that giving up drinking doesn&#039;t make you live longer - it just seems that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean that there&#8217;s some truth in the old joke that giving up drinking doesn&#8217;t make you live longer &#8211; it just seems that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tessa K</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/12/trivial-disputes/comment-page-1/#comment-1580</link>
		<dc:creator>Tessa K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=197#comment-1580</guid>
		<description>According to The Sceptic in today&#039;s Guardian,  there is a correlation between drinking and living longer. He says: &#039;The only gloom is that the evidence is far less promising for women: it may be that the health benefits of alcohol only apply to men.&#039;

At last, the excuse men need for skiving off down the pub.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to The Sceptic in today&#8217;s Guardian,  there is a correlation between drinking and living longer. He says: &#8216;The only gloom is that the evidence is far less promising for women: it may be that the health benefits of alcohol only apply to men.&#8217;</p>
<p>At last, the excuse men need for skiving off down the pub.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/12/trivial-disputes/comment-page-1/#comment-1575</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=197#comment-1575</guid>
		<description>Surely the conclusion reached by the study in the Daily Mail is just a variation of what is known as the â€˜alcohol paradoxâ€™: that drinking alcohol in moderation does not lead to the expected weight gain (expected, that is, from the naÃ¯ve viewpoint that more calories = more weight).

Several studies have shown that moderate consumption of alcohol does not lead to weight gain and some have actually show that, in women, those who drink alcohol actually weigh less than those who donâ€™t drink.  

For example, Mark F McCarty, writing in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, states that â€˜large cross-sectional epidemiologic surveys show that women who are moderate drinkers tend to be much lighter than women who do not drink.â€™ 

The British Health Survey, published in 1995, found that women who were moderate drinkers were about half as likely to be obese as non-drinkers. 

A study of 138,000 men and women by Harvard University, published in 1991, found that men who drank moderate amounts of wine or beer gained no more weight over the years than men who did not and that women had a body mass index about 15 per cent lower than non-drinkers. 

And finally, in one very recent study (published in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition in 2003) by the Department of Primary Care and Population Science, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, the authors concluded that â€˜there is no evidence that light-to-moderate drinking is associated with weight gainâ€™. 

Several short-term diet studies have echoed these findings: people who temporarily added alcohol to their diets usually lost weight.

Those scientists who specialise in the field of alcohol metabolism have known about this relationship between alcohol and weight for over twenty years (and refer to it as â€˜the alcohol paradoxâ€™, as they have been unable to explain why alcohol does not put on weight). For example, Eric JÃ©quier of the Institute of Physiology, University of Lausanne, writing in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, stated that â€˜the relation between alcohol consumption and body weight remains an enigma for nutritionistsâ€™. And John Crouse, medical researcher at Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, states: â€˜It comes as a shock to see that people who drink more don&#039;t weigh moreâ€™.


Sorry about the somewhat ambiguous nature of the references â€“ the above stuff comes from a note I wrote for a friend of mine months ago in which I excluded all unnecessary detail to avoid boring her and I have since lost the original list of references I had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely the conclusion reached by the study in the Daily Mail is just a variation of what is known as the â€˜alcohol paradoxâ€™: that drinking alcohol in moderation does not lead to the expected weight gain (expected, that is, from the naÃ¯ve viewpoint that more calories = more weight).</p>
<p>Several studies have shown that moderate consumption of alcohol does not lead to weight gain and some have actually show that, in women, those who drink alcohol actually weigh less than those who donâ€™t drink.  </p>
<p>For example, Mark F McCarty, writing in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, states that â€˜large cross-sectional epidemiologic surveys show that women who are moderate drinkers tend to be much lighter than women who do not drink.â€™ </p>
<p>The British Health Survey, published in 1995, found that women who were moderate drinkers were about half as likely to be obese as non-drinkers. </p>
<p>A study of 138,000 men and women by Harvard University, published in 1991, found that men who drank moderate amounts of wine or beer gained no more weight over the years than men who did not and that women had a body mass index about 15 per cent lower than non-drinkers. </p>
<p>And finally, in one very recent study (published in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition in 2003) by the Department of Primary Care and Population Science, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, the authors concluded that â€˜there is no evidence that light-to-moderate drinking is associated with weight gainâ€™. </p>
<p>Several short-term diet studies have echoed these findings: people who temporarily added alcohol to their diets usually lost weight.</p>
<p>Those scientists who specialise in the field of alcohol metabolism have known about this relationship between alcohol and weight for over twenty years (and refer to it as â€˜the alcohol paradoxâ€™, as they have been unable to explain why alcohol does not put on weight). For example, Eric JÃ©quier of the Institute of Physiology, University of Lausanne, writing in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, stated that â€˜the relation between alcohol consumption and body weight remains an enigma for nutritionistsâ€™. And John Crouse, medical researcher at Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, states: â€˜It comes as a shock to see that people who drink more don&#8217;t weigh moreâ€™.</p>
<p>Sorry about the somewhat ambiguous nature of the references â€“ the above stuff comes from a note I wrote for a friend of mine months ago in which I excluded all unnecessary detail to avoid boring her and I have since lost the original list of references I had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tessa K</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/12/trivial-disputes/comment-page-1/#comment-1541</link>
		<dc:creator>Tessa K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 23:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=197#comment-1541</guid>
		<description>Lies, damn lies ... and statistics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lies, damn lies &#8230; and statistics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teek</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/12/trivial-disputes/comment-page-1/#comment-1531</link>
		<dc:creator>Teek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=197#comment-1531</guid>
		<description>(1) choose only good prognosis cases to evaluate; (2) keep follow-up periods as short as possible; (3) avoid control and comparison groups; (4) choose measures carefully; (5) focus only on alcohol outcomes; (6) use liberal definitions of success; (7) rely solely upon self-report and (8) always declare victory regardless of findings. 

hey, maybe the Bristol homeopaths have read this advice, they seem to apply it word for word in their &quot;research&quot;!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(1) choose only good prognosis cases to evaluate; (2) keep follow-up periods as short as possible; (3) avoid control and comparison groups; (4) choose measures carefully; (5) focus only on alcohol outcomes; (6) use liberal definitions of success; (7) rely solely upon self-report and (8) always declare victory regardless of findings. </p>
<p>hey, maybe the Bristol homeopaths have read this advice, they seem to apply it word for word in their &#8220;research&#8221;!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Coffin</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/12/trivial-disputes/comment-page-1/#comment-1528</link>
		<dc:creator>John Coffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 19:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=197#comment-1528</guid>
		<description>Calorie intake in the form of  alcohol doesn&#039;t float in a separate univerise from other sources. Most drinking alcoholics (in my personal sample of several hundred acquaintances) eat poorly. Nothing quite dampens the appeal of a hearty breakfast like dry heaves and a splitting headache; the appeal of fresh fruit and robust vegetables is attenuated by a constantly sour and turbulent stomach.

It is also worth noting that I&#039;ve never heard of wet drunk who didn&#039;t consider THEIR drinking a model of moderation. As the old joke goes: &#039;How do you know when an alcoholic is lying?.....their lips move.&quot;

The impossibility of extracting valid data from surveys and limited clinical observation (&#039;gerbils and neutrons don&#039;t lie, people do&#039;) is nicely  put in the following citation:

Addiction
Volume 91 Issue 6 Page 779  - June 1996
doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.1996.9167795.x
How to have a high success rate in treatment: advice for evaluators of alcoholism programs 
William R. Miller, Martha Sanchez-Craig
Two seasoned alcohol treatment researchers offer tongue-in-cheek advice to novice program evaluators faced with increasing pressure to show high success rates. Based on published examples, they advise: (1) choose only good prognosis cases to evaluate; (2) keep follow-up periods as short as possible; (3) avoid control and comparison groups; (4) choose measures carefully; (5) focus only on alcohol outcomes; (6) use liberal definitions of success; (7) rely solely upon self-report and (8) always declare victory regardless of findings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Calorie intake in the form of  alcohol doesn&#8217;t float in a separate univerise from other sources. Most drinking alcoholics (in my personal sample of several hundred acquaintances) eat poorly. Nothing quite dampens the appeal of a hearty breakfast like dry heaves and a splitting headache; the appeal of fresh fruit and robust vegetables is attenuated by a constantly sour and turbulent stomach.</p>
<p>It is also worth noting that I&#8217;ve never heard of wet drunk who didn&#8217;t consider THEIR drinking a model of moderation. As the old joke goes: &#8216;How do you know when an alcoholic is lying?&#8230;..their lips move.&#8221;</p>
<p>The impossibility of extracting valid data from surveys and limited clinical observation (&#8216;gerbils and neutrons don&#8217;t lie, people do&#8217;) is nicely  put in the following citation:</p>
<p>Addiction<br />
Volume 91 Issue 6 Page 779  &#8211; June 1996<br />
doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.1996.9167795.x<br />
How to have a high success rate in treatment: advice for evaluators of alcoholism programs<br />
William R. Miller, Martha Sanchez-Craig<br />
Two seasoned alcohol treatment researchers offer tongue-in-cheek advice to novice program evaluators faced with increasing pressure to show high success rates. Based on published examples, they advise: (1) choose only good prognosis cases to evaluate; (2) keep follow-up periods as short as possible; (3) avoid control and comparison groups; (4) choose measures carefully; (5) focus only on alcohol outcomes; (6) use liberal definitions of success; (7) rely solely upon self-report and (8) always declare victory regardless of findings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Miles</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/12/trivial-disputes/comment-page-1/#comment-1526</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=197#comment-1526</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s not forget age as a possible third factor.  In my experience, older people are more likely to be non-drinkers than younger people.  As I get older, I find I drink considerably less (having young children makes hangovers really, really grim) and I also find I&#039;m less sprightly than I once was (children don&#039;t both fit on the back of my bike, so I can&#039;t cycle as much).

However, it&#039;s not really for us to provide potential reasons.  If they want to convince us of a causal argument, they need to present it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s not forget age as a possible third factor.  In my experience, older people are more likely to be non-drinkers than younger people.  As I get older, I find I drink considerably less (having young children makes hangovers really, really grim) and I also find I&#8217;m less sprightly than I once was (children don&#8217;t both fit on the back of my bike, so I can&#8217;t cycle as much).</p>
<p>However, it&#8217;s not really for us to provide potential reasons.  If they want to convince us of a causal argument, they need to present it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delster</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/12/trivial-disputes/comment-page-1/#comment-1519</link>
		<dc:creator>Delster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=197#comment-1519</guid>
		<description>I used to drink quite a bit. Out most nights and maybe 5-8 pints a night, every night!

However i was also very fit.  5&#039; 10&quot; in height and about 170lb without a single scrap of spare flesh on me, the reason i was able to maintain that? i was in the military and doing a lot of hard physical work. I was on my feet for the whole day, I also swam 2.5km every afternoon after work.

These days i am a more moderat drinker but am also quite a bit heavier, the reason? i took a desk job.

I dare say that if you took a bunch of heavy drinkers and put them through basic training they would lose more weight than a control group of heavy drinkers who just cut out the booze.

my point? i hear you cry.... well why do people keep looking for &quot;causes&quot; for obesity etc when it&#039;s a simple matter of what goes in has to be used or removed or else it accumulates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to drink quite a bit. Out most nights and maybe 5-8 pints a night, every night!</p>
<p>However i was also very fit.  5&#8242; 10&#8243; in height and about 170lb without a single scrap of spare flesh on me, the reason i was able to maintain that? i was in the military and doing a lot of hard physical work. I was on my feet for the whole day, I also swam 2.5km every afternoon after work.</p>
<p>These days i am a more moderat drinker but am also quite a bit heavier, the reason? i took a desk job.</p>
<p>I dare say that if you took a bunch of heavy drinkers and put them through basic training they would lose more weight than a control group of heavy drinkers who just cut out the booze.</p>
<p>my point? i hear you cry&#8230;. well why do people keep looking for &#8220;causes&#8221; for obesity etc when it&#8217;s a simple matter of what goes in has to be used or removed or else it accumulates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RS</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/12/trivial-disputes/comment-page-1/#comment-1518</link>
		<dc:creator>RS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=197#comment-1518</guid>
		<description>&quot;Isnâ€™t it just as likely that being thin makes people psychologically more likely to drink alcohol&quot;

Maybe the fat people are all hiding at home, friendless, while the beautiful young things are out socialising in the fashionable bars and clubs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Isnâ€™t it just as likely that being thin makes people psychologically more likely to drink alcohol&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe the fat people are all hiding at home, friendless, while the beautiful young things are out socialising in the fashionable bars and clubs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GWO</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/12/trivial-disputes/comment-page-1/#comment-1516</link>
		<dc:creator>GWO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=197#comment-1516</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m more interested in the alternative causation.  

Isn&#039;t it just as likely that being thin makes people psychologically more likely to drink alcohol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m more interested in the alternative causation.  </p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it just as likely that being thin makes people psychologically more likely to drink alcohol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teek</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/12/trivial-disputes/comment-page-1/#comment-1513</link>
		<dc:creator>Teek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 09:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=197#comment-1513</guid>
		<description>&quot;drinking a few times a week can cut the risk of obesity by 27% compared to teetotallers&quot;

this appears to arise from the &quot;cum hoc ergo propter hoc&quot; fallacy (no i&#039;m not a flaky humanities grad, i just spend too much time on Wikipedia - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_implies_causation_%28logical_fallacy%29)

just because non-drinkers seem to be more obese than moderate drinkers, doesn&#039;t mean drinking moderate amounts make you thinner. as Ben said, there could be a common reason or missing link that cause folks not to drink and to be fat at the same time.

oh, and folks, re: the above &quot;i&#039;m think and don&#039;t drink&quot; type stories - nice testemonials, but let&#039;s not forget - the plural of anecdote is not data...!&quot; http://www.badscience.net/?a=xdforum&amp;xdforum_action=viewthread&amp;xf_id=1&amp;xt_id=8

p.s. when can we buy those T-shirts already...?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;drinking a few times a week can cut the risk of obesity by 27% compared to teetotallers&#8221;</p>
<p>this appears to arise from the &#8220;cum hoc ergo propter hoc&#8221; fallacy (no i&#8217;m not a flaky humanities grad, i just spend too much time on Wikipedia &#8211; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_implies_causation_%28logical_fallacy%29" rel="nofollow">en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_implies_causation_%28logical_fallacy%29</a>)</p>
<p>just because non-drinkers seem to be more obese than moderate drinkers, doesn&#8217;t mean drinking moderate amounts make you thinner. as Ben said, there could be a common reason or missing link that cause folks not to drink and to be fat at the same time.</p>
<p>oh, and folks, re: the above &#8220;i&#8217;m think and don&#8217;t drink&#8221; type stories &#8211; nice testemonials, but let&#8217;s not forget &#8211; the plural of anecdote is not data&#8230;!&#8221; <a href="http://www.badscience.net/?a=xdforum&#038;xdforum_action=viewthread&#038;xf_id=1&#038;xt_id=8" rel="nofollow">www.badscience.net/?a=xdforum&#038;xdforum_action=viewthread&#038;xf_id=1&#038;xt_id=8</a></p>
<p>p.s. when can we buy those T-shirts already&#8230;?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RS</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/12/trivial-disputes/comment-page-1/#comment-1510</link>
		<dc:creator>RS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=197#comment-1510</guid>
		<description>Well Type II DM and drinking alcohol aren&#039;t the best combination, which is one potential skew.

But don&#039;t obese people underestimate what they eat, so it wouldn&#039;t be a stretch of the imagination to think they underestimate what they drink too, particularly as alcohol is recognised as a calorie source.

Can we make a silly argument about otaining a proportion of your calories via alcohol rather than fatty foods, and the impact on weight?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Type II DM and drinking alcohol aren&#8217;t the best combination, which is one potential skew.</p>
<p>But don&#8217;t obese people underestimate what they eat, so it wouldn&#8217;t be a stretch of the imagination to think they underestimate what they drink too, particularly as alcohol is recognised as a calorie source.</p>
<p>Can we make a silly argument about otaining a proportion of your calories via alcohol rather than fatty foods, and the impact on weight?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tessa K</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/12/trivial-disputes/comment-page-1/#comment-1500</link>
		<dc:creator>Tessa K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 20:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=197#comment-1500</guid>
		<description>If you switched from being teetotal to drinking alcohol for the purpose of the experiment, of course you would put on weight. More calories going in, the same number being burnt up as before. However, that would not be a valid experiment as the figures in the article are comparing current lifestyles. Similarly, a drinker who gave up would lose weight. (In both cases, all other things being equal, of course).

The word &#039;teetotaller&#039; in the article doesn&#039;t reveal how many have given up and how many never drank, as Ben points out. It&#039;s often said that when you give up one addiction, you&#039;re likely to replace it with another. If the replacement is pies, you&#039;ll pork up.

For the record, I don&#039;t drink and I am thin. Yes, I know, I am a freak of nature (the not drinking, not the thin part).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you switched from being teetotal to drinking alcohol for the purpose of the experiment, of course you would put on weight. More calories going in, the same number being burnt up as before. However, that would not be a valid experiment as the figures in the article are comparing current lifestyles. Similarly, a drinker who gave up would lose weight. (In both cases, all other things being equal, of course).</p>
<p>The word &#8216;teetotaller&#8217; in the article doesn&#8217;t reveal how many have given up and how many never drank, as Ben points out. It&#8217;s often said that when you give up one addiction, you&#8217;re likely to replace it with another. If the replacement is pies, you&#8217;ll pork up.</p>
<p>For the record, I don&#8217;t drink and I am thin. Yes, I know, I am a freak of nature (the not drinking, not the thin part).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coobeastie</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/12/trivial-disputes/comment-page-1/#comment-1497</link>
		<dc:creator>Coobeastie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=197#comment-1497</guid>
		<description>Very anecdotal, but everyone I know could give up chocolate or alcohol, but not both. As far as booze is concerned I can take it or leave it, but deny me my chocolate and I get grouchy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very anecdotal, but everyone I know could give up chocolate or alcohol, but not both. As far as booze is concerned I can take it or leave it, but deny me my chocolate and I get grouchy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

