<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Now Look What You&#8217;ve Made Me Do&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/now-look-what-youve-made-me-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/now-look-what-youve-made-me-do/</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:24:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delster</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/now-look-what-youve-made-me-do/comment-page-1/#comment-6342</link>
		<dc:creator>Delster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 12:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=252#comment-6342</guid>
		<description>what gets me is how many people assume that herbal (ie plant derived) medicine is in the same catagory as homeopathy... ie totally ineffective.

I&#039;m not a pharmacist but off the cuff i can think of several medicines that are in general use and were derived from plants. 

To give a few - Asprin, Quinine and Curare. Asprin everybody knows about. Quinine is (or was...anybody?) an anti malaria drug and curare is a muscle relaxant, which is so effective it&#039;ll relax you to death if your not careful, used in surgical prep.



The main problem with herbal, as pointed out above, is quality control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what gets me is how many people assume that herbal (ie plant derived) medicine is in the same catagory as homeopathy&#8230; ie totally ineffective.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a pharmacist but off the cuff i can think of several medicines that are in general use and were derived from plants. </p>
<p>To give a few &#8211; Asprin, Quinine and Curare. Asprin everybody knows about. Quinine is (or was&#8230;anybody?) an anti malaria drug and curare is a muscle relaxant, which is so effective it&#8217;ll relax you to death if your not careful, used in surgical prep.</p>
<p>The main problem with herbal, as pointed out above, is quality control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Aust</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/now-look-what-youve-made-me-do/comment-page-1/#comment-6339</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Aust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 11:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=252#comment-6339</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom

Thanks for correcting me - very interesting  

I had always assumed herbals were much more regulated in (say) Germany than in the UK mainly since (i) the Germans are into heavy regulation of the health sector (including CAM) than we are; and (ii) herbals are so widely prescribed there by doctors (e.g. St J&#039;s Wort for mild depression)... so figured people selling herbals there would have to have much more stringent quality control and product info.

I have noticed that here in the UK certain herbal formulations have much better info than others - e.g. for St J&#039;s W again, Kira that Boots sell (which is made by Lichtwer Pharma, a big German company you probably know) has stuff like &quot;equivalent to  xx ug hypericin&quot; and a full side-effects leaflet. But if I walk to the local Health Food superstore they have loads of different brands of SJW  and a health-food salesperson who says &quot;oh, this one is good&quot; and sells me/you a bottle with minimal info.

I would be interested to hear your views on the &quot;comparability&quot; of the regulations (if any) on product quality / included product info for mainstream pharmaceuticals and herbals.

Going back to your original point, I would have predicted that adverse side-effect reporting would be less with (e.g.) herbals simply because they don&#039;t come from the GP/hospital like mainstream stuff does, which provides a contact point and &quot;avenue&quot; for reports of side-effects of pharmaceuticals to go back to MHRA. Does your experience shed any light on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom</p>
<p>Thanks for correcting me &#8211; very interesting  </p>
<p>I had always assumed herbals were much more regulated in (say) Germany than in the UK mainly since (i) the Germans are into heavy regulation of the health sector (including CAM) than we are; and (ii) herbals are so widely prescribed there by doctors (e.g. St J&#8217;s Wort for mild depression)&#8230; so figured people selling herbals there would have to have much more stringent quality control and product info.</p>
<p>I have noticed that here in the UK certain herbal formulations have much better info than others &#8211; e.g. for St J&#8217;s W again, Kira that Boots sell (which is made by Lichtwer Pharma, a big German company you probably know) has stuff like &#8220;equivalent to  xx ug hypericin&#8221; and a full side-effects leaflet. But if I walk to the local Health Food superstore they have loads of different brands of SJW  and a health-food salesperson who says &#8220;oh, this one is good&#8221; and sells me/you a bottle with minimal info.</p>
<p>I would be interested to hear your views on the &#8220;comparability&#8221; of the regulations (if any) on product quality / included product info for mainstream pharmaceuticals and herbals.</p>
<p>Going back to your original point, I would have predicted that adverse side-effect reporting would be less with (e.g.) herbals simply because they don&#8217;t come from the GP/hospital like mainstream stuff does, which provides a contact point and &#8220;avenue&#8221; for reports of side-effects of pharmaceuticals to go back to MHRA. Does your experience shed any light on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom p</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/now-look-what-youve-made-me-do/comment-page-1/#comment-6334</link>
		<dc:creator>tom p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 11:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=252#comment-6334</guid>
		<description>Oh, and herbals are supposed to be regulated the same way all over the EEA under the Traditional herbal Medicines Directive (Directive 2004/24/EC amending, as regards traditional herbal medicinal products, Directive 2001/83/EC)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and herbals are supposed to be regulated the same way all over the EEA under the Traditional herbal Medicines Directive (Directive 2004/24/EC amending, as regards traditional herbal medicinal products, Directive 2001/83/EC)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom p</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/now-look-what-youve-made-me-do/comment-page-1/#comment-6333</link>
		<dc:creator>tom p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 10:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=252#comment-6333</guid>
		<description>Dr aust,

There is somewhere for adverse reactions to herbal medicines to be reported - The MHRA. I should know, I was the herbals officer (for my level) there for a while.

Also, herbals aren&#039;t technically unlicensed, genuine traditional ones can just get an automatic license and don&#039;t have to do anything to get it other than apply (well, I hink they have to show the quality of the product, but other than GMP there&#039;s nothing).

The one area where they are (in theory at least) regulated is in advertising. Herbal peddlers have to include an invitation to always read the product leaflet or similar (http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/idcplg?IdcService=SS_GET_PAGE&amp;nodeId=600), but rarely do.

I&#039;ve noticed that adverts for herbals in general almost always fail to comply with the lenient requirements in the blue book (available for download from the above link) and have started complaining to the MHRA (not that they seem to have done anything about it yet).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr aust,</p>
<p>There is somewhere for adverse reactions to herbal medicines to be reported &#8211; The MHRA. I should know, I was the herbals officer (for my level) there for a while.</p>
<p>Also, herbals aren&#8217;t technically unlicensed, genuine traditional ones can just get an automatic license and don&#8217;t have to do anything to get it other than apply (well, I hink they have to show the quality of the product, but other than GMP there&#8217;s nothing).</p>
<p>The one area where they are (in theory at least) regulated is in advertising. Herbal peddlers have to include an invitation to always read the product leaflet or similar (<a href="http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/idcplg?IdcService=SS_GET_PAGE&#038;nodeId=600" rel="nofollow">www.mhra.gov.uk/home/idcplg?IdcService=SS_GET_PAGE&#038;nodeId=600</a>), but rarely do.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed that adverts for herbals in general almost always fail to comply with the lenient requirements in the blue book (available for download from the above link) and have started complaining to the MHRA (not that they seem to have done anything about it yet).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sockatume</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/now-look-what-youve-made-me-do/comment-page-1/#comment-6310</link>
		<dc:creator>sockatume</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=252#comment-6310</guid>
		<description>Michael Harman: Just to confuse the matters, I&#039;d like to point out that potency supposedly decreases with dilution in homeopathy. Must be a real pain in the neck when it comes to managing their aqueous waste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Harman: Just to confuse the matters, I&#8217;d like to point out that potency supposedly decreases with dilution in homeopathy. Must be a real pain in the neck when it comes to managing their aqueous waste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Aust</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/now-look-what-youve-made-me-do/comment-page-1/#comment-6308</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Aust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=252#comment-6308</guid>
		<description>A palm to David Colquhoun, a very nice man (and a proper scientist) who long ago once attempted to teach me some statistics (the professional statisticians were unable to explain statistics in anything resembling English, sadly all too common a failing) . He has indeed had a go at Univs running Alt Med degrees. See:

http://www.ucl.ac.uk/Pharmacology/dc-bits/quack.html#univ

Go David. 

I have a slightly crazed vision of a Buffy&#039;s gang-style crew of Alt Medicine Slayers. Ben isn&#039;t really blonde enough for Buffy so perhaps he will have to be cast as Xander, plenty ofooprtunities for witty quips. David Colquhoun would be a shoo-in for the Giles role.

Think I need to lay off the strong coffee in the afternoon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A palm to David Colquhoun, a very nice man (and a proper scientist) who long ago once attempted to teach me some statistics (the professional statisticians were unable to explain statistics in anything resembling English, sadly all too common a failing) . He has indeed had a go at Univs running Alt Med degrees. See:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ucl.ac.uk/Pharmacology/dc-bits/quack.html#univ" rel="nofollow">www.ucl.ac.uk/Pharmacology/dc-bits/quack.html#univ</a></p>
<p>Go David. </p>
<p>I have a slightly crazed vision of a Buffy&#8217;s gang-style crew of Alt Medicine Slayers. Ben isn&#8217;t really blonde enough for Buffy so perhaps he will have to be cast as Xander, plenty ofooprtunities for witty quips. David Colquhoun would be a shoo-in for the Giles role.</p>
<p>Think I need to lay off the strong coffee in the afternoon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Aust</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/now-look-what-youve-made-me-do/comment-page-1/#comment-6307</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Aust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=252#comment-6307</guid>
		<description>Re. Pseudomonas&#039; comments:

Presumably the columnists are &quot;geared&quot; to writing positive stories:  &quot;you could try this&quot; &quot;This might do some good&quot; &quot;read this helps&quot; etc etc.   Harder to say &quot;nothing you can do expect eat healthy and take exercise&quot;, they would just keep repeating themselves.

&quot;Negative results are always harder to publish than a good &quot;this could be something&quot; result&quot;  

.. at last - a parallel between science and Alt Health!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re. Pseudomonas&#8217; comments:</p>
<p>Presumably the columnists are &#8220;geared&#8221; to writing positive stories:  &#8220;you could try this&#8221; &#8220;This might do some good&#8221; &#8220;read this helps&#8221; etc etc.   Harder to say &#8220;nothing you can do expect eat healthy and take exercise&#8221;, they would just keep repeating themselves.</p>
<p>&#8220;Negative results are always harder to publish than a good &#8220;this could be something&#8221; result&#8221;  </p>
<p>.. at last &#8211; a parallel between science and Alt Health!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Goldacre</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/now-look-what-youve-made-me-do/comment-page-1/#comment-6306</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=252#comment-6306</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A Quantitative Analysis Of The Frequency With Which One Company Is Promoted, And  By Whom, In UK National Newspapers&lt;/strong&gt;

Dr Ben Goldacre*
Bad Science Research Institute, 
www.badscience.net
tips@badscience.net
*Corresponding Author

&lt;strong&gt;Introduction.&lt;/strong&gt;

Susan Clark is an alternative therapy columnist who yesterday made a barbed attack on her critics. It has been noted that she promotes one company, Victoria Health, with some regularity. It was unclear what the background frequency of this company being promoted in newspapers was.

&lt;strong&gt;Methods.&lt;/strong&gt;

Since I couldn&#039;t be bothered to cycle to the Guardian and go through all the newspaper archives systematically, I had a quick look at each newspaper&#039;s archives through publicly available resources, as a pilot study.

&lt;strong&gt;Results.
&lt;/strong&gt;

Victoria Health are promoted in the following newspapers and circumstances:

# You magazine (with which they have an explicit commercial relationship)

# by Susan Clark (dozens and dozens)

# by Emma Mitchell in the Guardian. [anybody know if she has a relationship with them?]

From this brief survey, several interesting negative findings also arose. No mention of Victoria Health could be found in other newspapers. Specifically, there were:

# no mentions in the Express:

http://www.google.co.uk/search?num=100&amp;hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;q=+site%3Awww.express.co.uk+%22victoria+health%22+&amp;btnG=Search&amp;meta=

# no mentions in the Independent:

http://www.independent.co.uk/search/simple.do?publicationId=55&amp;includeSectionId=38&amp;xsuccessUrl=index.jsp%3FtemplateName%3Dresult&amp;xerrorUrl=index.jsp%3FtemplateName%3Dresult&amp;searchEngineName=lucySearch1&amp;includeSubSections=true&amp;pageLength=25&amp;articleType=news&amp;sortString=by_date_desc&amp;maxRows=500&amp;searchString=%22victoria+health%22

# no mentions in the Telegraph:

http://www.google.co.uk/search?num=100&amp;hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;q=+site%3Awww.telegraph.co.uk+%22victoria+health%22+&amp;btnG=Search&amp;meta=

# no mentions in the Daily Mail (from google alone) except once briefly in the context of an explicit commercial relationship:

http://www.google.co.uk/search?num=100&amp;hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;q=+site%3Awww.dailymail.co.uk+%22victoria+health%22+&amp;btnG=Search&amp;meta=

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A Quantitative Analysis Of The Frequency With Which One Company Is Promoted, And  By Whom, In UK National Newspapers</strong></p>
<p>Dr Ben Goldacre*<br />
Bad Science Research Institute,<br />
<a href="http://www.badscience.net" rel="nofollow">www.badscience.net</a><br />
<a href="mailto:tips@badscience.net">tips@badscience.net</a><br />
*Corresponding Author</p>
<p><strong>Introduction.</strong></p>
<p>Susan Clark is an alternative therapy columnist who yesterday made a barbed attack on her critics. It has been noted that she promotes one company, Victoria Health, with some regularity. It was unclear what the background frequency of this company being promoted in newspapers was.</p>
<p><strong>Methods.</strong></p>
<p>Since I couldn&#8217;t be bothered to cycle to the Guardian and go through all the newspaper archives systematically, I had a quick look at each newspaper&#8217;s archives through publicly available resources, as a pilot study.</p>
<p><strong>Results.<br />
</strong></p>
<p>Victoria Health are promoted in the following newspapers and circumstances:</p>
<p># You magazine (with which they have an explicit commercial relationship)</p>
<p># by Susan Clark (dozens and dozens)</p>
<p># by Emma Mitchell in the Guardian. [anybody know if she has a relationship with them?]</p>
<p>From this brief survey, several interesting negative findings also arose. No mention of Victoria Health could be found in other newspapers. Specifically, there were:</p>
<p># no mentions in the Express:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?num=100&#038;hl=en&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&#038;q=+site%3Awww.express.co.uk+%22victoria+health%22+&#038;btnG=Search&#038;meta" rel="nofollow">www.google.co.uk/search?num=100&#038;hl=en&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&#038;q=+site%3Awww.express.co.uk+%22victoria+health%22+&#038;btnG=Search&#038;meta</a>=</p>
<p># no mentions in the Independent:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/search/simple.do?publicationId=55&#038;includeSectionId=38&#038;xsuccessUrl=index.jsp%3FtemplateName%3Dresult&#038;xerrorUrl=index.jsp%3FtemplateName%3Dresult&#038;searchEngineName=lucySearch1&#038;includeSubSections=true&#038;pageLength=25&#038;articleType=news&#038;sortString=by_date_desc&#038;maxRows=500&#038;searchString=%22victoria+health%22" rel="nofollow">www.independent.co.uk/search/simple.do?publicationId=55&#038;includeSectionId=38&#038;xsuccessUrl=index.jsp%3FtemplateName%3Dresult&#038;xerrorUrl=index.jsp%3FtemplateName%3Dresult&#038;searchEngineName=lucySearch1&#038;includeSubSections=true&#038;pageLength=25&#038;articleType=news&#038;sortString=by_date_desc&#038;maxRows=500&#038;searchString=%22victoria+health%22</a></p>
<p># no mentions in the Telegraph:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?num=100&#038;hl=en&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&#038;q=+site%3Awww.telegraph.co.uk+%22victoria+health%22+&#038;btnG=Search&#038;meta" rel="nofollow">www.google.co.uk/search?num=100&#038;hl=en&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&#038;q=+site%3Awww.telegraph.co.uk+%22victoria+health%22+&#038;btnG=Search&#038;meta</a>=</p>
<p># no mentions in the Daily Mail (from google alone) except once briefly in the context of an explicit commercial relationship:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?num=100&#038;hl=en&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&#038;q=+site%3Awww.dailymail.co.uk+%22victoria+health%22+&#038;btnG=Search&#038;meta" rel="nofollow">www.google.co.uk/search?num=100&#038;hl=en&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&#038;q=+site%3Awww.dailymail.co.uk+%22victoria+health%22+&#038;btnG=Search&#038;meta</a>=</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom p</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/now-look-what-youve-made-me-do/comment-page-1/#comment-6305</link>
		<dc:creator>tom p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=252#comment-6305</guid>
		<description>Another thing that marks Susan Clark out as stupid and dangerous and actively harming the morons who read her and take heed of her advice is this line &quot;I am afraid you will have to persist with this medication and instead, try to deal with the possible side-effects &quot;.

If she had the slightest brain or sense or compassion, she would tell the poor sod to go and see their doctor and tell them what has happened. The doctor could then prescribe a different medication.

Hopefully, the doctor would then inform the MHRA of this side effect, but it&#039;s frankly unlikely given the low low reporting rates of adverse drug reactions by doctors</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thing that marks Susan Clark out as stupid and dangerous and actively harming the morons who read her and take heed of her advice is this line &#8220;I am afraid you will have to persist with this medication and instead, try to deal with the possible side-effects &#8220;.</p>
<p>If she had the slightest brain or sense or compassion, she would tell the poor sod to go and see their doctor and tell them what has happened. The doctor could then prescribe a different medication.</p>
<p>Hopefully, the doctor would then inform the MHRA of this side effect, but it&#8217;s frankly unlikely given the low low reporting rates of adverse drug reactions by doctors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Aust</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/now-look-what-youve-made-me-do/comment-page-1/#comment-6304</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Aust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=252#comment-6304</guid>
		<description>Found my way from Emma Mitchell&#039;s columns to the website of the Nutritional Therapy Council (NTC) at

http://www.bant.org.uk/bant/jsp/index.faces

- she recommended it in one Guardian column as a way to find a nutritional practioner in your area.

..anyone know anything about this lot? 

The BANT website looks quite official, with links to &quot;Training&quot; and stuff about &quot;qualified nutritional practioners&quot; and even a Complaints Procedure, so they seem to be trying to look official and self-regulating / respectable. The list of &quot;Training Institutions&quot; is all small natural health colleges, plus the Westminster University School of Integrated Health.

I know David Colquhoun on his website at

http://www.ucl.ac.uk/Pharmacology/dc-bits/quack.html

gets particularly exercised about Universities setting up &quot;Alt Health&quot; degrees. Can&#039;t remember if he&#039;s had a go at Westminster</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found my way from Emma Mitchell&#8217;s columns to the website of the Nutritional Therapy Council (NTC) at</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bant.org.uk/bant/jsp/index.faces" rel="nofollow">www.bant.org.uk/bant/jsp/index.faces</a></p>
<p>- she recommended it in one Guardian column as a way to find a nutritional practioner in your area.</p>
<p>..anyone know anything about this lot? </p>
<p>The BANT website looks quite official, with links to &#8220;Training&#8221; and stuff about &#8220;qualified nutritional practioners&#8221; and even a Complaints Procedure, so they seem to be trying to look official and self-regulating / respectable. The list of &#8220;Training Institutions&#8221; is all small natural health colleges, plus the Westminster University School of Integrated Health.</p>
<p>I know David Colquhoun on his website at</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ucl.ac.uk/Pharmacology/dc-bits/quack.html" rel="nofollow">www.ucl.ac.uk/Pharmacology/dc-bits/quack.html</a></p>
<p>gets particularly exercised about Universities setting up &#8220;Alt Health&#8221; degrees. Can&#8217;t remember if he&#8217;s had a go at Westminster</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Goldacre</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/now-look-what-youve-made-me-do/comment-page-1/#comment-6303</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=252#comment-6303</guid>
		<description>pseudomonas: i think that&#039;s an incredibly good general point, the columnists make the dramatic claims and the adverts remain neutral. this is at it&#039;s most obvious with the vitamin ads, esp glucosamine, where all the ads ever tend to mention is the dose, the newspapers do the rest of the work for them. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pseudomonas: i think that&#8217;s an incredibly good general point, the columnists make the dramatic claims and the adverts remain neutral. this is at it&#8217;s most obvious with the vitamin ads, esp glucosamine, where all the ads ever tend to mention is the dose, the newspapers do the rest of the work for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pseudomonas</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/now-look-what-youve-made-me-do/comment-page-1/#comment-6302</link>
		<dc:creator>pseudomonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=252#comment-6302</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s great the way that you can avoid all the trading standards / advertising standards regulation if you persuade a columnist to spout guff about your quacksalvery rather than taking out and advertisement directly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s great the way that you can avoid all the trading standards / advertising standards regulation if you persuade a columnist to spout guff about your quacksalvery rather than taking out and advertisement directly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Aust</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/now-look-what-youve-made-me-do/comment-page-1/#comment-6301</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Aust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=252#comment-6301</guid>
		<description>Dontcha just love a blanket disclaimer?

Without labouring the point (oh well, I&#039;ll just go ahead and labour it, why not....) the Alt Health people get to have their cake and eat it.  If your doctor misdiagnoses you, or gives you the wrong treatment, you can sue him/her, and s/he can get struck off and lose their livelihood.

If you go to an Alt Health practitioner with a condition that is eminently treatable by conventional medicine, they are mostly under no professional obligation whatsoever to tell you so (unregulated, again). Instead they can charge you whatever you are prepared to pay for Bach Flower Remedies, Primal Scream therapy, Homeopathic tinctures, Laying On Of Hands etc.

You might describe this as &quot;odd&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dontcha just love a blanket disclaimer?</p>
<p>Without labouring the point (oh well, I&#8217;ll just go ahead and labour it, why not&#8230;.) the Alt Health people get to have their cake and eat it.  If your doctor misdiagnoses you, or gives you the wrong treatment, you can sue him/her, and s/he can get struck off and lose their livelihood.</p>
<p>If you go to an Alt Health practitioner with a condition that is eminently treatable by conventional medicine, they are mostly under no professional obligation whatsoever to tell you so (unregulated, again). Instead they can charge you whatever you are prepared to pay for Bach Flower Remedies, Primal Scream therapy, Homeopathic tinctures, Laying On Of Hands etc.</p>
<p>You might describe this as &#8220;odd&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pseudomonas</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/now-look-what-youve-made-me-do/comment-page-1/#comment-6300</link>
		<dc:creator>pseudomonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=252#comment-6300</guid>
		<description>Well, according to the Victoria Health website: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.victoriahealth.com/vh2/contents/blankproweb.csp?pageID=744&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The information and products contained within this website are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent diseases.
&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, according to the Victoria Health website: <a href="http://www.victoriahealth.com/vh2/contents/blankproweb.csp?pageID=744" rel="nofollow">The information and products contained within this website are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent diseases.<br />
</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raygirvan</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/now-look-what-youve-made-me-do/comment-page-1/#comment-6299</link>
		<dc:creator>raygirvan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=252#comment-6299</guid>
		<description>Further machinations: I notice Victoria Health has a special relationship with the Mail on Sunday&#039;s &lt;i&gt;YOU&lt;/i&gt; magazine. See &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.victoriahealth.com/vh2/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Victoria Health&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.you.co.uk/pages/you/article.html?in_page_id=1909&amp;in_article_id=385267&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;YOU&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further machinations: I notice Victoria Health has a special relationship with the Mail on Sunday&#8217;s <i>YOU</i> magazine. See <a HREF="http://www.victoriahealth.com/vh2/" rel="nofollow">Victoria Health</a> and <a HREF="http://www.you.co.uk/pages/you/article.html?in_page_id=1909&amp;in_article_id=385267" rel="nofollow">YOU</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Aust</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/now-look-what-youve-made-me-do/comment-page-1/#comment-6298</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Aust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=252#comment-6298</guid>
		<description>Nice one Sociology Boy

Plus ca change....

The &quot;What really works&quot; tag had me laughing. I read one of her columns at random and found it touting Lemon Balm as a therapy for &quot;low mood or melancholia&quot;. This was a response to someone who had taken Prozac but wanted a herbal remedy.

According to La Clark lemon balm  &quot;performed well in double-blind, placebo-controlled University research trials&quot;. This looked suitably impressive and caught my eye so I had a look on medline. There ARE two or three small trials, all done at one unit in Newcastle. But they actually say nothing about low mood/melancholia, instead indicating that the stuff might help with mild anxiety, or help you concentrate. Not quite the same thing as treating depression.

I really can&#039;t believe what some of these people get away with. Can they sleep at night?  Probably after a strong draught of Lemon Balm, KavaKava and Valerian. 

This is actually a mild example of Alt-Healthery, since at least it is based on something vaguely scientific, however minimal.

It all just testifies to the credulousness of the public, fed by the voluminous mystification (can I say that?) of all the Alt Health columnists and pundits. The public seem to want desperately to believe in magic bullets for curing disease or keeping you healthy, only they want to have &quot;natural&quot; ones instead of  &quot;Drugs&quot;. A fascinating (if depressing) phenomenon.

Diet is another good example of Alt Health mystification. One of my more trenchant medical buddies has taken to joking that he is going to write a dietary advice book (a la Poo Lady) containing the evidence-based info about diet and health, and retire on the proceeds. The trouble is that apart from the old nostrums (&quot;Eat lots of fresh produce&quot;  &quot;At least five portions of fruit and veg a day&quot; &quot;Avoid processed foods&quot; &quot;Try and cook with unsaturated fats&quot; &quot;don&#039;t eat too much red meat&quot;) there isn&#039;t much to say. But of course if people really hoisted in that the sensible advice on diet

(i) is already dispensed by mainstream healthcare people; and
(ii) could probably go on one side of A4 paper 

then the whole Alt Health industry would risk going down the pan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one Sociology Boy</p>
<p>Plus ca change&#8230;.</p>
<p>The &#8220;What really works&#8221; tag had me laughing. I read one of her columns at random and found it touting Lemon Balm as a therapy for &#8220;low mood or melancholia&#8221;. This was a response to someone who had taken Prozac but wanted a herbal remedy.</p>
<p>According to La Clark lemon balm  &#8220;performed well in double-blind, placebo-controlled University research trials&#8221;. This looked suitably impressive and caught my eye so I had a look on medline. There ARE two or three small trials, all done at one unit in Newcastle. But they actually say nothing about low mood/melancholia, instead indicating that the stuff might help with mild anxiety, or help you concentrate. Not quite the same thing as treating depression.</p>
<p>I really can&#8217;t believe what some of these people get away with. Can they sleep at night?  Probably after a strong draught of Lemon Balm, KavaKava and Valerian. </p>
<p>This is actually a mild example of Alt-Healthery, since at least it is based on something vaguely scientific, however minimal.</p>
<p>It all just testifies to the credulousness of the public, fed by the voluminous mystification (can I say that?) of all the Alt Health columnists and pundits. The public seem to want desperately to believe in magic bullets for curing disease or keeping you healthy, only they want to have &#8220;natural&#8221; ones instead of  &#8220;Drugs&#8221;. A fascinating (if depressing) phenomenon.</p>
<p>Diet is another good example of Alt Health mystification. One of my more trenchant medical buddies has taken to joking that he is going to write a dietary advice book (a la Poo Lady) containing the evidence-based info about diet and health, and retire on the proceeds. The trouble is that apart from the old nostrums (&#8220;Eat lots of fresh produce&#8221;  &#8220;At least five portions of fruit and veg a day&#8221; &#8220;Avoid processed foods&#8221; &#8220;Try and cook with unsaturated fats&#8221; &#8220;don&#8217;t eat too much red meat&#8221;) there isn&#8217;t much to say. But of course if people really hoisted in that the sensible advice on diet</p>
<p>(i) is already dispensed by mainstream healthcare people; and<br />
(ii) could probably go on one side of A4 paper </p>
<p>then the whole Alt Health industry would risk going down the pan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Goldacre</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/now-look-what-youve-made-me-do/comment-page-1/#comment-6297</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=252#comment-6297</guid>
		<description>no, hang on sociologyboy, that is odd... i think susan clark might also have mentioned Victoria Health a few times in her sunday times column... wait a minute... in fact... she recommended Victoria Health more times than i can even be bothered to count, somewhere between 34 and 46 according to google. 

http://www.google.co.uk/search?num=100&amp;hs=RQn&amp;hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;q=+site%3Awww.timesonline.co.uk+%22victoria+health%22+susan&amp;btnG=Search&amp;meta=

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no, hang on sociologyboy, that is odd&#8230; i think susan clark might also have mentioned Victoria Health a few times in her sunday times column&#8230; wait a minute&#8230; in fact&#8230; she recommended Victoria Health more times than i can even be bothered to count, somewhere between 34 and 46 according to google. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?num=100&#038;hs=RQn&#038;hl=en&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&#038;q=+site%3Awww.timesonline.co.uk+%22victoria+health%22+susan&#038;btnG=Search&#038;meta" rel="nofollow">www.google.co.uk/search?num=100&#038;hs=RQn&#038;hl=en&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&#038;q=+site%3Awww.timesonline.co.uk+%22victoria+health%22+susan&#038;btnG=Search&#038;meta</a>=</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sociology Boy</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/now-look-what-youve-made-me-do/comment-page-1/#comment-6295</link>
		<dc:creator>Sociology Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=252#comment-6295</guid>
		<description>Sorry, did I say Sunday Times above? I meant Observer, and of course her columns on the Victoria Health website were written prior to her time there. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, did I say Sunday Times above? I meant Observer, and of course her columns on the Victoria Health website were written prior to her time there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sociology Boy</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/now-look-what-youve-made-me-do/comment-page-1/#comment-6294</link>
		<dc:creator>Sociology Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=252#comment-6294</guid>
		<description>Susan Clark? Victoria Health? Surely that can&#039;t be the same Susan Clark that has a series of columns (called &#039;What Really Works&#039;, natch) published on, er, www.victoriahealth.com? Have a look at the wisdom that is contained here: http://www.victoriahealth.com/vh2/contents/genericPage.csp?pageID=1204

Can&#039;t imagine that there would be a conflict of interests between her work in the Sunday Times and flogging tat through Victoria Health, but there you go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan Clark? Victoria Health? Surely that can&#8217;t be the same Susan Clark that has a series of columns (called &#8216;What Really Works&#8217;, natch) published on, er, <a href="http://www.victoriahealth.com?" rel="nofollow">www.victoriahealth.com?</a> Have a look at the wisdom that is contained here: <a href="http://www.victoriahealth.com/vh2/contents/genericPage.csp?pageID=1204" rel="nofollow">www.victoriahealth.com/vh2/contents/genericPage.csp?pageID=1204</a></p>
<p>Can&#8217;t imagine that there would be a conflict of interests between her work in the Sunday Times and flogging tat through Victoria Health, but there you go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Aust</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/now-look-what-youve-made-me-do/comment-page-1/#comment-6293</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Aust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=252#comment-6293</guid>
		<description>PS  I meant &quot;go out in the sun&quot;, of course. Blame my typing. Wasn&#039;t suggesting St John&#039;s Wort makes people drive submersibles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS  I meant &#8220;go out in the sun&#8221;, of course. Blame my typing. Wasn&#8217;t suggesting St John&#8217;s Wort makes people drive submersibles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

