<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Illustrated History Of Food Gurus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/new-dogs-old-tricks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/new-dogs-old-tricks/</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:31:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jiangjiang</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/new-dogs-old-tricks/comment-page-1/#comment-29679</link>
		<dc:creator>jiangjiang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 02:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=329#comment-29679</guid>
		<description>ed hardy &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyplus.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy clothing &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy clothing&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyplus.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy clothing&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy shop &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy shop&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyplus.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy shop&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
christian audigier &lt;a title=&quot;christian audigier&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyplus.com/christian-audigier.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;christian audigier&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy cheap &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy cheap&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyplus.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy cheap&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy outlet &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy outlet&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyplus.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy outlet&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy sale &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy clothes&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyplus.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy sale&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy store &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy store&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyplus.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy store&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy mens &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy mens&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyplus.com/ed-hardy-mens.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy mens&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy womens &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy womens&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyplus.com/ed-hardy-womens.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy womens&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy kids &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy kids&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyplus.com/kids.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy kids&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ed hardy kids</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ed hardy <a title="ed hardy" href="http://www.edhardyplus.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy</strong></a><br />
ed hardy clothing <a title="ed hardy clothing" href="http://www.edhardyplus.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy clothing</strong></a><br />
ed hardy shop <a title="ed hardy shop" href="http://www.edhardyplus.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy shop</strong></a><br />
christian audigier <a title="christian audigier" href="http://www.edhardyplus.com/christian-audigier.html" rel="nofollow"><strong>christian audigier</strong></a><br />
ed hardy cheap <a title="ed hardy cheap" href="http://www.edhardyplus.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy cheap</strong></a><br />
ed hardy outlet <a title="ed hardy outlet" href="http://www.edhardyplus.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy outlet</strong></a><br />
ed hardy sale <a title="ed hardy clothes" href="http://www.edhardyplus.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy sale</strong></a><br />
ed hardy store <a title="ed hardy store" href="http://www.edhardyplus.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy store</strong></a><br />
ed hardy mens <a title="ed hardy mens" href="http://www.edhardyplus.com/ed-hardy-mens.html" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy mens</strong></a><br />
ed hardy womens <a title="ed hardy womens" href="http://www.edhardyplus.com/ed-hardy-womens.html" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy womens</strong></a><br />
ed hardy kids <a title="ed hardy kids" href="http://www.edhardyplus.com/kids.html" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy kids</strong></a> ed hardy kids</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Coffin</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/new-dogs-old-tricks/comment-page-1/#comment-9189</link>
		<dc:creator>John Coffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=329#comment-9189</guid>
		<description>By the way, that&#039;s *Bernarr* Macfadden. A much more prominent American nutcase than your mention suggests. Killed a couple of his children with quack remedies, launched the career of Dr. Bates, made millions publishing &#039;True Confessions&#039; and other lurid lumpenpornographie, ran for President of the US for the Physical Culture Party, etc.

Have McKeith and Ann Coulter ever been seen at the same time? The pathological scrawniness and glazed eyes are a dead match.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, that&#8217;s *Bernarr* Macfadden. A much more prominent American nutcase than your mention suggests. Killed a couple of his children with quack remedies, launched the career of Dr. Bates, made millions publishing &#8216;True Confessions&#8217; and other lurid lumpenpornographie, ran for President of the US for the Physical Culture Party, etc.</p>
<p>Have McKeith and Ann Coulter ever been seen at the same time? The pathological scrawniness and glazed eyes are a dead match.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimW</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/new-dogs-old-tricks/comment-page-1/#comment-9159</link>
		<dc:creator>TimW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 14:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=329#comment-9159</guid>
		<description>Maybe that&#039;s not her real age, same as she&#039;s not a real doctor.

Or perhaps it really is 47 but not in base 10.  Hexadecimal perhaps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe that&#8217;s not her real age, same as she&#8217;s not a real doctor.</p>
<p>Or perhaps it really is 47 but not in base 10.  Hexadecimal perhaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kells</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/new-dogs-old-tricks/comment-page-1/#comment-9143</link>
		<dc:creator>Kells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=329#comment-9143</guid>
		<description>I think TAPL should be referred to as TAPL, 47. I was shocked to discover her age in a recent Times article. Up until that point I thought she looked pretty bad for someone in their mid to late fifties, now I&#039;m worried for her health. 

I wouldn&#039;t make any cruel jokes about looking battered or the effects of too much dried fruit etc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think TAPL should be referred to as TAPL, 47. I was shocked to discover her age in a recent Times article. Up until that point I thought she looked pretty bad for someone in their mid to late fifties, now I&#8217;m worried for her health. </p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t make any cruel jokes about looking battered or the effects of too much dried fruit etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/new-dogs-old-tricks/comment-page-1/#comment-9137</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=329#comment-9137</guid>
		<description>Maybe TAPL believes in Goebbels assertion that if you repeat a lie often enough people will begin to believe it.

Of course I wouldn&#039;t dream of linking the Nazi propaganda minister with TAPL in any other form.  

P.S. Allegedly.  (Does this work?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe TAPL believes in Goebbels assertion that if you repeat a lie often enough people will begin to believe it.</p>
<p>Of course I wouldn&#8217;t dream of linking the Nazi propaganda minister with TAPL in any other form.  </p>
<p>P.S. Allegedly.  (Does this work?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mojo</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/new-dogs-old-tricks/comment-page-1/#comment-9136</link>
		<dc:creator>Mojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=329#comment-9136</guid>
		<description>billgibson said (#9), &quot;Weâ€™ve all recognised that, DrM, but it appears that she hasnâ€™t.&quot;

To the extent that the front page of her website manages to cram in the phrases &quot;Dr Gillian McKeith&quot; or &quot;Dr Gillian&quot; 20 times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>billgibson said (#9), &#8220;Weâ€™ve all recognised that, DrM, but it appears that she hasnâ€™t.&#8221;</p>
<p>To the extent that the front page of her website manages to cram in the phrases &#8220;Dr Gillian McKeith&#8221; or &#8220;Dr Gillian&#8221; 20 times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ayupmeduck</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/new-dogs-old-tricks/comment-page-1/#comment-9134</link>
		<dc:creator>ayupmeduck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 20:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=329#comment-9134</guid>
		<description>Not living in the UK, this is then first time I&#039;d seen an image of the Lady and it literally made me shudder:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=su5owxISwWs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not living in the UK, this is then first time I&#8217;d seen an image of the Lady and it literally made me shudder:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=su5owxISwWs" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=su5owxISwWs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billgibson</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/new-dogs-old-tricks/comment-page-1/#comment-9127</link>
		<dc:creator>billgibson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=329#comment-9127</guid>
		<description>Teek - shall I take you calling me billgobson as an innocent typo or a subtle way of telling me to shut up? ;~)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Teek &#8211; shall I take you calling me billgobson as an innocent typo or a subtle way of telling me to shut up? ;~)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Clegg</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/new-dogs-old-tricks/comment-page-1/#comment-9123</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Clegg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=329#comment-9123</guid>
		<description>&quot;Kellogg was a natural healer, masturbation campaigner, and health food advocate&quot;

Ben, perhaps &quot;anti-masturbation campaigner&quot; would have been better, to distinguish him from the likes of &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_Reich&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wilhelm Reich&lt;/a&gt;...

Andrew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Kellogg was a natural healer, masturbation campaigner, and health food advocate&#8221;</p>
<p>Ben, perhaps &#8220;anti-masturbation campaigner&#8221; would have been better, to distinguish him from the likes of <a HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_Reich" rel="nofollow">Wilhelm Reich</a>&#8230;</p>
<p>Andrew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evidencebasedeating</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/new-dogs-old-tricks/comment-page-1/#comment-9121</link>
		<dc:creator>evidencebasedeating</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=329#comment-9121</guid>
		<description>Michaels comment #7 highilighting TAPL presumed credentials...

â€œAfter more than 15 years *in clinical practice* â€¦ â€ - Dr Gillian McKeith 

is nothing new to us quackwatchers of nutrition. The natural evolution of the genre were the original 1980&#039;s  &#039;nutritional therapists&#039;, with the public eventually recognising that the term &#039;therapist&#039; was very loosely associated with any expertise in the subject . Then came the promotion of the &#039;nutritionist&#039; - a non-protected title used by the bona fide and the enthusiastic amateur alike. But opening appointment sessions in post retail establishments and the ubiquitous high street health food store allowed the title to extend to &#039;clinical nutritionist&#039; - sounds so much more, well, clinical (ergo, &#039;knowledgeable&#039;) than their previous incarnations. 
and now, of course we have the title  &#039;leading clinical nutritionist&#039;  -a term banded about by deluded enthusiastic amateurs who consider the approval of their fellow enthusiastic amateurs or uninformed public as evidence of the integrity of their knowledge. Paradoxically, the true  &#039;leading clinical nutritionists&#039; recognised by those qualified to have an opinion (such as Registered Nutritionists and Registered Dietitians in the UK) have very little media presence, being ensconced in the sound scientific scrutiny of nutritional research that wil generate real and meaningful indicators of nutritional recommendations for the future - not the &quot;wheat free, milk free, supplement promoting, dodgy intolerance testing&quot; mantras of the current gurus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michaels comment #7 highilighting TAPL presumed credentials&#8230;</p>
<p>â€œAfter more than 15 years *in clinical practice* â€¦ â€ &#8211; Dr Gillian McKeith </p>
<p>is nothing new to us quackwatchers of nutrition. The natural evolution of the genre were the original 1980&#8217;s  &#8216;nutritional therapists&#8217;, with the public eventually recognising that the term &#8216;therapist&#8217; was very loosely associated with any expertise in the subject . Then came the promotion of the &#8216;nutritionist&#8217; &#8211; a non-protected title used by the bona fide and the enthusiastic amateur alike. But opening appointment sessions in post retail establishments and the ubiquitous high street health food store allowed the title to extend to &#8216;clinical nutritionist&#8217; &#8211; sounds so much more, well, clinical (ergo, &#8216;knowledgeable&#8217;) than their previous incarnations.<br />
and now, of course we have the title  &#8216;leading clinical nutritionist&#8217;  -a term banded about by deluded enthusiastic amateurs who consider the approval of their fellow enthusiastic amateurs or uninformed public as evidence of the integrity of their knowledge. Paradoxically, the true  &#8216;leading clinical nutritionists&#8217; recognised by those qualified to have an opinion (such as Registered Nutritionists and Registered Dietitians in the UK) have very little media presence, being ensconced in the sound scientific scrutiny of nutritional research that wil generate real and meaningful indicators of nutritional recommendations for the future &#8211; not the &#8220;wheat free, milk free, supplement promoting, dodgy intolerance testing&#8221; mantras of the current gurus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teek</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/new-dogs-old-tricks/comment-page-1/#comment-9117</link>
		<dc:creator>Teek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 10:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=329#comment-9117</guid>
		<description>billgobson said:

&quot;Weâ€™ve all recognised that, DrM, but it appears that she hasnâ€™t. I notice that Channel 4 have started calling her â€œMs McKeithâ€. Personally I prefer to preface her name with â€œthat odious charlatan loonyâ€.


spot on, altho as i have an acronym fetish i prefer TAPL - that awful poo lady - as do many on this site...!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>billgobson said:</p>
<p>&#8220;Weâ€™ve all recognised that, DrM, but it appears that she hasnâ€™t. I notice that Channel 4 have started calling her â€œMs McKeithâ€. Personally I prefer to preface her name with â€œthat odious charlatan loonyâ€.</p>
<p>spot on, altho as i have an acronym fetish i prefer TAPL &#8211; that awful poo lady &#8211; as do many on this site&#8230;!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lizdav</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/new-dogs-old-tricks/comment-page-1/#comment-9113</link>
		<dc:creator>lizdav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 16:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=329#comment-9113</guid>
		<description>Working in a place where her dubiuos stuff is sold, any product which is taken off the shelf is great by me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Working in a place where her dubiuos stuff is sold, any product which is taken off the shelf is great by me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Carnegie</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/new-dogs-old-tricks/comment-page-1/#comment-9112</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Carnegie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 14:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=329#comment-9112</guid>
		<description>Shall I admit to watching on &quot;five&quot;, [A Girl&#039;s Guide to 21st Century Sex]?  Just to keep up with what colleagues may be talking about.  (Or not.)  Anyway, going by the adverts they show, who are they kidding with the &quot;girl&quot; thing.  But they also did a penis enlargement trial - and, yeah, the various methods seemed to work, fancy that, but you wouldn&#039;t want to do it, really.  Not unless you really, really had to.

Oh, and in UK History&#039;s [Sex, Love and War] - why am I admitting this? - one girl from the ATS or similar recollected that most of her unit had disappointing experiences with men - possibly also implying that what they said about ATS girls was quite true, but in the circumstances (war on) you couldn&#039;t hold it against them - and they all went, not as a group, to this doctor who usually diagnosed an underdeveloped clitoris.  If you rubbed his fairly expensive cream on it you&#039;d have orgasm all right - and they did - and you&#039;d be able to hang a copper kettle on it, which is a difficult scene to picture and wouldn&#039;t you burn your legs?

So it really has been going on for some time.  Probably since Enlightenment scientists first discovered vacuum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shall I admit to watching on &#8220;five&#8221;, [A Girl's Guide to 21st Century Sex]?  Just to keep up with what colleagues may be talking about.  (Or not.)  Anyway, going by the adverts they show, who are they kidding with the &#8220;girl&#8221; thing.  But they also did a penis enlargement trial &#8211; and, yeah, the various methods seemed to work, fancy that, but you wouldn&#8217;t want to do it, really.  Not unless you really, really had to.</p>
<p>Oh, and in UK History&#8217;s [Sex, Love and War] &#8211; why am I admitting this? &#8211; one girl from the ATS or similar recollected that most of her unit had disappointing experiences with men &#8211; possibly also implying that what they said about ATS girls was quite true, but in the circumstances (war on) you couldn&#8217;t hold it against them &#8211; and they all went, not as a group, to this doctor who usually diagnosed an underdeveloped clitoris.  If you rubbed his fairly expensive cream on it you&#8217;d have orgasm all right &#8211; and they did &#8211; and you&#8217;d be able to hang a copper kettle on it, which is a difficult scene to picture and wouldn&#8217;t you burn your legs?</p>
<p>So it really has been going on for some time.  Probably since Enlightenment scientists first discovered vacuum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billgibson</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/new-dogs-old-tricks/comment-page-1/#comment-9111</link>
		<dc:creator>billgibson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 12:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=329#comment-9111</guid>
		<description>&quot;she also has â€œa Masters and doctorate (PhD) in Holistic Nutrition from the American Holistic College of Nutrition (USA)â€ - I thought we had established she did not have a recognised PhDâ€¦&quot;

We&#039;ve all recognised that, DrM, but it appears that she hasn&#039;t. I notice that Channel 4 have started calling her &quot;Ms McKeith&quot;. Personally I prefer to preface her name with &quot;that odious charlatan loony&quot;.

Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;she also has â€œa Masters and doctorate (PhD) in Holistic Nutrition from the American Holistic College of Nutrition (USA)â€ &#8211; I thought we had established she did not have a recognised PhDâ€¦&#8221;</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve all recognised that, DrM, but it appears that she hasn&#8217;t. I notice that Channel 4 have started calling her &#8220;Ms McKeith&#8221;. Personally I prefer to preface her name with &#8220;that odious charlatan loony&#8221;.</p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doctormonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/new-dogs-old-tricks/comment-page-1/#comment-9109</link>
		<dc:creator>doctormonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 22:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=329#comment-9109</guid>
		<description>fun fun fun about Ms McKeith from the website given by deryck in #5

the school she got her acupuncture certificate from is not recognised by the British Acupuncture Accreditation Board (whoever they are but they recognise courses from or associated with proper universities)

she also has &quot;a Masters and doctorate (PhD) in Holistic Nutrition from the American Holistic College of Nutrition (USA)&quot; - I thought we had established she did not have a recognised PhD...

I can&#039;t be bothered with the rest but she just seems more and more like a snake oil salesman/person the more I read or see about her</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fun fun fun about Ms McKeith from the website given by deryck in #5</p>
<p>the school she got her acupuncture certificate from is not recognised by the British Acupuncture Accreditation Board (whoever they are but they recognise courses from or associated with proper universities)</p>
<p>she also has &#8220;a Masters and doctorate (PhD) in Holistic Nutrition from the American Holistic College of Nutrition (USA)&#8221; &#8211; I thought we had established she did not have a recognised PhD&#8230;</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t be bothered with the rest but she just seems more and more like a snake oil salesman/person the more I read or see about her</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Harman</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/new-dogs-old-tricks/comment-page-1/#comment-9108</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Harman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=329#comment-9108</guid>
		<description>Looking at the site noted by deryk, she does look thoroughly scrawny - not just the peculiar right hand.

And her blurb beside it is interesting as well (I&#039;ve added the emphasis):

&quot;After more than 15 years *in clinical practice* ... &quot; - Dr Gillian McKeith</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at the site noted by deryk, she does look thoroughly scrawny &#8211; not just the peculiar right hand.</p>
<p>And her blurb beside it is interesting as well (I&#8217;ve added the emphasis):</p>
<p>&#8220;After more than 15 years *in clinical practice* &#8230; &#8221; &#8211; Dr Gillian McKeith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billgibson</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/new-dogs-old-tricks/comment-page-1/#comment-9107</link>
		<dc:creator>billgibson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=329#comment-9107</guid>
		<description>Is it just me, or does anyone else feel sorry for the bloke whose wife had announced to him and the rest of the world that she&#039;s divorcing him in the advert below Ben&#039;s column in today&#039;s Grauniad?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me, or does anyone else feel sorry for the bloke whose wife had announced to him and the rest of the world that she&#8217;s divorcing him in the advert below Ben&#8217;s column in today&#8217;s Grauniad?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deryck</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/new-dogs-old-tricks/comment-page-1/#comment-9106</link>
		<dc:creator>deryck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=329#comment-9106</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or does her right hand seem strange in the full body picture on http://www.drgillianmckeith.com/pub-mid2.php?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or does her right hand seem strange in the full body picture on <a href="http://www.drgillianmckeith.com/pub-mid2.php?" rel="nofollow">http://www.drgillianmckeith.com/pub-mid2.php?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Goldacre</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/new-dogs-old-tricks/comment-page-1/#comment-9105</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 19:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=329#comment-9105</guid>
		<description>&quot;The funny bit for me was that the robot which matches ads to articles put three links to dieting websites at the end. Two for pills, one for a patch.&quot;

yeah, similarly, i had a nightmare emailing it in, nobody was getting my emails, it turned out the spam filters were driven wild by the claims for mckeiths product, because there&#039;s so much &quot;1mpr0ve ur ejaculate satisfy your w0man&quot; email spam around, the filters just rejected the column outright every time i sent it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The funny bit for me was that the robot which matches ads to articles put three links to dieting websites at the end. Two for pills, one for a patch.&#8221;</p>
<p>yeah, similarly, i had a nightmare emailing it in, nobody was getting my emails, it turned out the spam filters were driven wild by the claims for mckeiths product, because there&#8217;s so much &#8220;1mpr0ve ur ejaculate satisfy your w0man&#8221; email spam around, the filters just rejected the column outright every time i sent it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrunoBigNose</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/new-dogs-old-tricks/comment-page-1/#comment-9104</link>
		<dc:creator>BrunoBigNose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 19:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=329#comment-9104</guid>
		<description>I read this on The Graun&#039;s website today. The funny bit for me was that the robot which matches ads to articles put three links to dieting websites at the end. Two for pills, one for a patch. I don&#039;t think that&#039;ll be a very effective in generating sales.

PS. I&#039;ve only just signed up to badscience, but I&#039;ve been lurking for ages. I&#039;m a huge fan, and fabulous work Dr G!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read this on The Graun&#8217;s website today. The funny bit for me was that the robot which matches ads to articles put three links to dieting websites at the end. Two for pills, one for a patch. I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;ll be a very effective in generating sales.</p>
<p>PS. I&#8217;ve only just signed up to badscience, but I&#8217;ve been lurking for ages. I&#8217;m a huge fan, and fabulous work Dr G!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
