<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (MediaSlut &#8211; Ideas) + Money = CorporateWhore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/2006/12/mediaslut-ideas-money-corporatewhore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/12/mediaslut-ideas-money-corporatewhore/</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:52:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jiangjiang</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/12/mediaslut-ideas-money-corporatewhore/comment-page-1/#comment-29661</link>
		<dc:creator>jiangjiang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 02:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=340#comment-29661</guid>
		<description>ed hardy &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyplus.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy clothing &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy clothing&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyplus.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy clothing&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy shop &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy shop&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyplus.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy shop&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
christian audigier &lt;a title=&quot;christian audigier&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyplus.com/christian-audigier.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;christian audigier&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy cheap &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy cheap&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyplus.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy cheap&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy outlet &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy outlet&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyplus.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy outlet&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy sale &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy clothes&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyplus.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy sale&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy store &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy store&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyplus.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy store&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy mens &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy mens&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyplus.com/ed-hardy-mens.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy mens&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy womens &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy womens&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyplus.com/ed-hardy-womens.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy womens&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy kids &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy kids&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyplus.com/kids.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy kids&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ed hardy kids</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ed hardy <a title="ed hardy" href="http://www.edhardyplus.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy</strong></a><br />
ed hardy clothing <a title="ed hardy clothing" href="http://www.edhardyplus.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy clothing</strong></a><br />
ed hardy shop <a title="ed hardy shop" href="http://www.edhardyplus.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy shop</strong></a><br />
christian audigier <a title="christian audigier" href="http://www.edhardyplus.com/christian-audigier.html" rel="nofollow"><strong>christian audigier</strong></a><br />
ed hardy cheap <a title="ed hardy cheap" href="http://www.edhardyplus.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy cheap</strong></a><br />
ed hardy outlet <a title="ed hardy outlet" href="http://www.edhardyplus.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy outlet</strong></a><br />
ed hardy sale <a title="ed hardy clothes" href="http://www.edhardyplus.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy sale</strong></a><br />
ed hardy store <a title="ed hardy store" href="http://www.edhardyplus.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy store</strong></a><br />
ed hardy mens <a title="ed hardy mens" href="http://www.edhardyplus.com/ed-hardy-mens.html" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy mens</strong></a><br />
ed hardy womens <a title="ed hardy womens" href="http://www.edhardyplus.com/ed-hardy-womens.html" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy womens</strong></a><br />
ed hardy kids <a title="ed hardy kids" href="http://www.edhardyplus.com/kids.html" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy kids</strong></a> ed hardy kids</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wayscj</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/12/mediaslut-ideas-money-corporatewhore/comment-page-1/#comment-29218</link>
		<dc:creator>wayscj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=340#comment-29218</guid>
		<description>Laptop Battery &lt;a title=&quot;Laptop Battery&quot; href=&quot;http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Laptop Battery&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Laptop Batteries
&lt;a title=&quot;Laptop Batteries&quot; href=&quot;http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Laptop Batteries&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; discount laptop battery
&lt;a title=&quot;discount laptop battery&quot; href=&quot;http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;discount laptop battery&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;a title=&quot;notebook battery&quot; href=&quot;http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;notebook battery&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  notebook battery
&lt;a title=&quot;computer battery&quot; href=&quot;http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;computer battery&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  computer battery
&lt;a title=&quot;replacement laptop battery&quot; href=&quot;http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;replacement laptop battery&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  replacement laptop battery
&lt;a title=&quot;notebook batteries&quot; href=&quot;http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;notebook batteries&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; notebook batteries</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laptop Battery <a title="Laptop Battery" href="http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>Laptop Battery</strong></a> Laptop Batteries<br />
<a title="Laptop Batteries" href="http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>Laptop Batteries</strong></a> discount laptop battery<br />
<a title="discount laptop battery" href="http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>discount laptop battery</strong></a><br />
<a title="notebook battery" href="http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>notebook battery</strong></a>  notebook battery<br />
<a title="computer battery" href="http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>computer battery</strong></a>  computer battery<br />
<a title="replacement laptop battery" href="http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>replacement laptop battery</strong></a>  replacement laptop battery<br />
<a title="notebook batteries" href="http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>notebook batteries</strong></a> notebook batteries</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: longyan</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/12/mediaslut-ideas-money-corporatewhore/comment-page-1/#comment-28504</link>
		<dc:creator>longyan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=340#comment-28504</guid>
		<description>The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ugg2you.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-32.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ugg knightsbridge&lt;/a&gt; world is a comedy to those who thinks, a tragedy to those &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ugg2you.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ugg classic cardy&lt;/a&gt; who feels.Look not  mournfully into the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ugg2you.com/specials.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ugg boots&lt;/a&gt; past, it comes not back again. Wisely improve the present,  it is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ugg2you.com/ugg-lo-pro-button-c-27.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ugg lo pro button&lt;/a&gt; thine. Go forth to meet the shadowy future, without fear, and with a  manly &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ugg2you.com/ugg-bailey-button-c-26.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ugg bailey button&lt;/a&gt; heart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.ugg2you.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-32.html" rel="nofollow">ugg knightsbridge</a> world is a comedy to those who thinks, a tragedy to those <a href="http://www.ugg2you.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2.html" rel="nofollow">ugg classic cardy</a> who feels.Look not  mournfully into the <a href="http://www.ugg2you.com/specials.html" rel="nofollow">ugg boots</a> past, it comes not back again. Wisely improve the present,  it is <a href="http://www.ugg2you.com/ugg-lo-pro-button-c-27.html" rel="nofollow">ugg lo pro button</a> thine. Go forth to meet the shadowy future, without fear, and with a  manly <a href="http://www.ugg2you.com/ugg-bailey-button-c-26.html" rel="nofollow">ugg bailey button</a> heart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Goldacre</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/12/mediaslut-ideas-money-corporatewhore/comment-page-1/#comment-10029</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=340#comment-10029</guid>
		<description>http://living.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=95802007

The happy feat
ANDREW BURNET

HOW are you expecting to feel when you wake up on Monday 22 January? Gloomy? Chilly? Hard-up? Full of the lurgy? Or just a bit Monday-morningish? Well, you won&#039;t be alone.

Two years ago, the fourth Monday in January was officially designated the unhappiest day of the year. That&#039;s &quot;officially&quot; according to the findings of psychologist and academic Cliff Arnall, who was then based at Cardiff University, having been commissioned by Sky Travel to come up with the ideal date on which to cheer yourself up by booking a holiday.

Using six factors, including post-Christmas debt, midwinter weather and failed New Year&#039;s resolutions, he came up with a tongue-in-cheek formula to identify the year&#039;s most miserable day. The idea caught on, and Arnall&#039;s formulae were commissioned by other organisations, including the ice-cream manufacturer Wall&#039;s, which asked him to pin down the happiest day of the summer.

For Arnall, though, the outcome of this project was not altogether a happy one.

Some members of the scientific establishment attacked him for trivialising the issues surrounding depression and anxiety.

Arnall doesn&#039;t accept this criticism: &quot;I became involved because I wanted to get people talking about depression and cut down the stigma of it,&quot; he says. &quot;Even if it just means people at the pub saying, &#039;Did you hear about that daft equation?&#039; it all adds up, as far as I&#039;m concerned.&quot; Ultimately, though, the university authorities took such a dim view of his media activities that they terminated his contract.

This January, Arnall is not letting it get him down. He happily insists he has plenty of work lecturing, running workshops and consulting individual clients.

But if you are feeling down and want to banish the 22 January blues, what can you do about it? Here&#039;s some timely advice from people for whom human happiness is not just a concept, but a part of their livelihood.

http://www.gm.tv/index.cfm?articleid=24235

Don&#039;t suffer in silence
Apparently Monday the 22nd of January is the most miserable day of the year. We need you to tell us why

How miserable will you be next Monday?

Scientest Dr Cliff Arnall has calcualted that next Monday, the 22nd of January will be the most depressing day of the year.

He has based this formula considering debt, time elasped since Christmas, failing New Year&#039;s resolutions and low motivations at work.

We want to hear from you. What makes you miserable this time of year? And will next Monday be the most miserable and why?

You can email us using the form below, text us on 81189 cost 25p + network rate, or send a video message to 07739 672 673 cost 50p + network rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://living.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=95802007" rel="nofollow">http://living.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=95802007</a></p>
<p>The happy feat<br />
ANDREW BURNET</p>
<p>HOW are you expecting to feel when you wake up on Monday 22 January? Gloomy? Chilly? Hard-up? Full of the lurgy? Or just a bit Monday-morningish? Well, you won&#8217;t be alone.</p>
<p>Two years ago, the fourth Monday in January was officially designated the unhappiest day of the year. That&#8217;s &#8220;officially&#8221; according to the findings of psychologist and academic Cliff Arnall, who was then based at Cardiff University, having been commissioned by Sky Travel to come up with the ideal date on which to cheer yourself up by booking a holiday.</p>
<p>Using six factors, including post-Christmas debt, midwinter weather and failed New Year&#8217;s resolutions, he came up with a tongue-in-cheek formula to identify the year&#8217;s most miserable day. The idea caught on, and Arnall&#8217;s formulae were commissioned by other organisations, including the ice-cream manufacturer Wall&#8217;s, which asked him to pin down the happiest day of the summer.</p>
<p>For Arnall, though, the outcome of this project was not altogether a happy one.</p>
<p>Some members of the scientific establishment attacked him for trivialising the issues surrounding depression and anxiety.</p>
<p>Arnall doesn&#8217;t accept this criticism: &#8220;I became involved because I wanted to get people talking about depression and cut down the stigma of it,&#8221; he says. &#8220;Even if it just means people at the pub saying, &#8216;Did you hear about that daft equation?&#8217; it all adds up, as far as I&#8217;m concerned.&#8221; Ultimately, though, the university authorities took such a dim view of his media activities that they terminated his contract.</p>
<p>This January, Arnall is not letting it get him down. He happily insists he has plenty of work lecturing, running workshops and consulting individual clients.</p>
<p>But if you are feeling down and want to banish the 22 January blues, what can you do about it? Here&#8217;s some timely advice from people for whom human happiness is not just a concept, but a part of their livelihood.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gm.tv/index.cfm?articleid=24235" rel="nofollow">http://www.gm.tv/index.cfm?articleid=24235</a></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t suffer in silence<br />
Apparently Monday the 22nd of January is the most miserable day of the year. We need you to tell us why</p>
<p>How miserable will you be next Monday?</p>
<p>Scientest Dr Cliff Arnall has calcualted that next Monday, the 22nd of January will be the most depressing day of the year.</p>
<p>He has based this formula considering debt, time elasped since Christmas, failing New Year&#8217;s resolutions and low motivations at work.</p>
<p>We want to hear from you. What makes you miserable this time of year? And will next Monday be the most miserable and why?</p>
<p>You can email us using the form below, text us on 81189 cost 25p + network rate, or send a video message to 07739 672 673 cost 50p + network rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whisht</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/12/mediaslut-ideas-money-corporatewhore/comment-page-1/#comment-9799</link>
		<dc:creator>Whisht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=340#comment-9799</guid>
		<description>Hi all,
aw, I know I should post something cerebral, but.... its the winterval an&#039; all and this is fairly amusing:
http://www.fireland.com/sentence/

and on topic (well, its an equation...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all,<br />
aw, I know I should post something cerebral, but&#8230;. its the winterval an&#8217; all and this is fairly amusing:<br />
<a href="http://www.fireland.com/sentence/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fireland.com/sentence/</a></p>
<p>and on topic (well, its an equation&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RS</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/12/mediaslut-ideas-money-corporatewhore/comment-page-1/#comment-9682</link>
		<dc:creator>RS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=340#comment-9682</guid>
		<description>Unfortunate that, unlike the states, &quot;psychologist&quot; isn&#039;t a protected title (like &quot;doctor&quot; sadly, although &quot;charted psychologist&quot; is protected).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunate that, unlike the states, &#8220;psychologist&#8221; isn&#8217;t a protected title (like &#8220;doctor&#8221; sadly, although &#8220;charted psychologist&#8221; is protected).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RS</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/12/mediaslut-ideas-money-corporatewhore/comment-page-1/#comment-9681</link>
		<dc:creator>RS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=340#comment-9681</guid>
		<description>I note that you call him &quot;Dr&quot; Cliff Arnall, why?  Doesn&#039;t seem to be a doctor of anything according to his little bio: http://www.nopills.demon.co.uk/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I note that you call him &#8220;Dr&#8221; Cliff Arnall, why?  Doesn&#8217;t seem to be a doctor of anything according to his little bio: <a href="http://www.nopills.demon.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.nopills.demon.co.uk/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RS</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/12/mediaslut-ideas-money-corporatewhore/comment-page-1/#comment-9680</link>
		<dc:creator>RS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=340#comment-9680</guid>
		<description>Guess who says this on his website: &quot;Quick word about academic publications (which includes some of mine): many are conducted on very small samples of university students. The results are then often generalised to the rest of the population. This is clearly ridiculous and in the UK and the US in particular it is arrogant. Why? Well, people in other parts of the world may not behave as we do. They may have different ways of responding to drugs, particular social settings, mental illness, stress...

Don&#039;t assume that because a paper appears in a posh journal that what it says is true or valid. Check out the sample used in the study (i.e. who are the people used) and check out the design - it may lead to biases. Also feel free to e-mail the key author to share your questions or concerns - though there&#039;s no guarantee they&#039;ll respond.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess who says this on his website: &#8220;Quick word about academic publications (which includes some of mine): many are conducted on very small samples of university students. The results are then often generalised to the rest of the population. This is clearly ridiculous and in the UK and the US in particular it is arrogant. Why? Well, people in other parts of the world may not behave as we do. They may have different ways of responding to drugs, particular social settings, mental illness, stress&#8230;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t assume that because a paper appears in a posh journal that what it says is true or valid. Check out the sample used in the study (i.e. who are the people used) and check out the design &#8211; it may lead to biases. Also feel free to e-mail the key author to share your questions or concerns &#8211; though there&#8217;s no guarantee they&#8217;ll respond.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silverfin</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/12/mediaslut-ideas-money-corporatewhore/comment-page-1/#comment-9662</link>
		<dc:creator>Silverfin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=340#comment-9662</guid>
		<description>When I was a maths teacher sometimes my students would proudly bring in formulas of that ilk (usually from Metro), and I would explain why they were bollocks. (Except without using the word bollocks.)

I think this stuff is damaging because many of the readers (non-geek, non-academic ones) think that 1) if a &#039;scientist&#039; says something it must be true, and 2) that this is the sort of thing that scientists, academics spend their time working on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was a maths teacher sometimes my students would proudly bring in formulas of that ilk (usually from Metro), and I would explain why they were bollocks. (Except without using the word bollocks.)</p>
<p>I think this stuff is damaging because many of the readers (non-geek, non-academic ones) think that 1) if a &#8217;scientist&#8217; says something it must be true, and 2) that this is the sort of thing that scientists, academics spend their time working on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evil Kao Chiu</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/12/mediaslut-ideas-money-corporatewhore/comment-page-1/#comment-9660</link>
		<dc:creator>Evil Kao Chiu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=340#comment-9660</guid>
		<description>What I like is that if you Google &quot;Cliff Arnall&quot; you get a load of sceptical websites liberally scattered with those bigging-up Cliff&#039; and his qualifications.  The former consists in amateurs; the latter consisting in news outlets.  Someone remind me what the point of journalists is again?

Er, except Ben, that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I like is that if you Google &#8220;Cliff Arnall&#8221; you get a load of sceptical websites liberally scattered with those bigging-up Cliff&#8217; and his qualifications.  The former consists in amateurs; the latter consisting in news outlets.  Someone remind me what the point of journalists is again?</p>
<p>Er, except Ben, that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimW</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/12/mediaslut-ideas-money-corporatewhore/comment-page-1/#comment-9646</link>
		<dc:creator>TimW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 15:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=340#comment-9646</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a goodun:

&quot;Completely fictional scientists at a made up university have announced today that they have discovered the formula for a successful press release. The newsworthyness of a story, known in the trade as its Arnall quotient, can be written as:

Arnall = B0/10cKs
...&quot;

http://iscience.wordpress.com/2006/06/23/formula-for-a-successful-press-release/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a goodun:</p>
<p>&#8220;Completely fictional scientists at a made up university have announced today that they have discovered the formula for a successful press release. The newsworthyness of a story, known in the trade as its Arnall quotient, can be written as:</p>
<p>Arnall = B0/10cKs<br />
&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://iscience.wordpress.com/2006/06/23/formula-for-a-successful-press-release/" rel="nofollow">http://iscience.wordpress.com/2006/06/23/formula-for-a-successful-press-release/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackpt</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/12/mediaslut-ideas-money-corporatewhore/comment-page-1/#comment-9633</link>
		<dc:creator>jackpt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 09:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=340#comment-9633</guid>
		<description>Similarly the geek demographic, whatever that actually is, may be the majority group when it comes to writing about certain subjects.  Instead of writing about silly equations I imagine most people just make that clicking noise with their tongue briefly touching the bit above their upper front teeth, saying something like &quot;have you seen what this boffin has come up with!  Well I never&quot;.  Maybe I&#039;m vastly over estimating the general ignorance out there, but I&#039;d be willing to bet that other search phrases aren&#039;t dominated by geek content.  Which would suggest that (these days) Google isn&#039;t necessarily geek biased for subjects that geeks don&#039;t search for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Similarly the geek demographic, whatever that actually is, may be the majority group when it comes to writing about certain subjects.  Instead of writing about silly equations I imagine most people just make that clicking noise with their tongue briefly touching the bit above their upper front teeth, saying something like &#8220;have you seen what this boffin has come up with!  Well I never&#8221;.  Maybe I&#8217;m vastly over estimating the general ignorance out there, but I&#8217;d be willing to bet that other search phrases aren&#8217;t dominated by geek content.  Which would suggest that (these days) Google isn&#8217;t necessarily geek biased for subjects that geeks don&#8217;t search for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Rutter</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/12/mediaslut-ideas-money-corporatewhore/comment-page-1/#comment-9631</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Rutter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 05:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=340#comment-9631</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not just the content, it&#039;s the linking as well. There&#039;s tons of non-geek content on MySpace &amp;c, but because (to a first approximation) nothing but a crappy MySpace page is ever likely to link to another crappy MySpace page, those pages&#039; PageRank remains miserable.

So while there&#039;s unquestionably a strong pro-geek bias, it does also deliver significant real quality control in Google results.

(And, as I write this, the &quot;Arnall&#039;s full of crap&quot; result has slipped to #2. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not just the content, it&#8217;s the linking as well. There&#8217;s tons of non-geek content on MySpace &amp;c, but because (to a first approximation) nothing but a crappy MySpace page is ever likely to link to another crappy MySpace page, those pages&#8217; PageRank remains miserable.</p>
<p>So while there&#8217;s unquestionably a strong pro-geek bias, it does also deliver significant real quality control in Google results.</p>
<p>(And, as I write this, the &#8220;Arnall&#8217;s full of crap&#8221; result has slipped to #2. <img src='http://www.badscience.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Goldacre</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/12/mediaslut-ideas-money-corporatewhore/comment-page-1/#comment-9611</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 20:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=340#comment-9611</guid>
		<description>google page rank naturally reflects the geek opinion I guess, but might only do so for as long as content is disproportionately produced by a geekier demographic...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>google page rank naturally reflects the geek opinion I guess, but might only do so for as long as content is disproportionately produced by a geekier demographic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimyojimbo</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/12/mediaslut-ideas-money-corporatewhore/comment-page-1/#comment-9607</link>
		<dc:creator>jimyojimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 19:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=340#comment-9607</guid>
		<description>@ MissPrism, #16:  Aye, yes, absolutely. I mean, of all the organisations you&#039;d look to to stimulate a serious public debate about clinical depression etc, Sky Effing Travel would be pretty low down the list.  Perhaps a couple ofplaces below the folks who made The Teletubbies.

I remember the first time Cliff Arnall&#039;s January equation thing came out; my colleagues and I (Psychology postgrads) wrote many responses to the BBC News Have Your Say site, with, predictably, no results.  Psychology, which is in any case a pretty general catch-all term for a vast and varied field, isn&#039;t exactly the most widely respected discipline in the media / public eye, and it&#039;s sh1te like this that makes it worse.  The weird thing is, at the time, we couldn&#039;t find him on the Cardiff Uni website (where the press said he was from, as far as I remember), and I can&#039;t even find his website now.

Although, Google &quot;Cliff Arnall&quot;, and the first result contains the phrase &quot;Cliff Arnall is full of sh1t&quot;.  Well done, Google.  Well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ MissPrism, #16:  Aye, yes, absolutely. I mean, of all the organisations you&#8217;d look to to stimulate a serious public debate about clinical depression etc, Sky Effing Travel would be pretty low down the list.  Perhaps a couple ofplaces below the folks who made The Teletubbies.</p>
<p>I remember the first time Cliff Arnall&#8217;s January equation thing came out; my colleagues and I (Psychology postgrads) wrote many responses to the BBC News Have Your Say site, with, predictably, no results.  Psychology, which is in any case a pretty general catch-all term for a vast and varied field, isn&#8217;t exactly the most widely respected discipline in the media / public eye, and it&#8217;s sh1te like this that makes it worse.  The weird thing is, at the time, we couldn&#8217;t find him on the Cardiff Uni website (where the press said he was from, as far as I remember), and I can&#8217;t even find his website now.</p>
<p>Although, Google &#8220;Cliff Arnall&#8221;, and the first result contains the phrase &#8220;Cliff Arnall is full of sh1t&#8221;.  Well done, Google.  Well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MissPrism</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/12/mediaslut-ideas-money-corporatewhore/comment-page-1/#comment-9598</link>
		<dc:creator>MissPrism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 17:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=340#comment-9598</guid>
		<description>If he wants to &quot;get people talking about depression&quot;, maybe he shouldn&#039;t be pushing the notion that it&#039;s the same thing as being a bit pissed off because the weather&#039;s bad and it&#039;s a long time til payday.  

Or maybe he&#039;s planning  to follow this story up with a big suicide equation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he wants to &#8220;get people talking about depression&#8221;, maybe he shouldn&#8217;t be pushing the notion that it&#8217;s the same thing as being a bit pissed off because the weather&#8217;s bad and it&#8217;s a long time til payday.  </p>
<p>Or maybe he&#8217;s planning  to follow this story up with a big suicide equation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Rutter</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/12/mediaslut-ideas-money-corporatewhore/comment-page-1/#comment-9585</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Rutter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=340#comment-9585</guid>
		<description>The amazing thing is how few of these proud whores have remembered to paint &quot;WHORE&quot; on both sides of their car in huge red letters. It just seems to slip their mind.

Fortunately, their fans sometimes find the time to do it for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The amazing thing is how few of these proud whores have remembered to paint &#8220;WHORE&#8221; on both sides of their car in huge red letters. It just seems to slip their mind.</p>
<p>Fortunately, their fans sometimes find the time to do it for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SciencePunk</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/12/mediaslut-ideas-money-corporatewhore/comment-page-1/#comment-9582</link>
		<dc:creator>SciencePunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=340#comment-9582</guid>
		<description>Hang on, Cliff gets multiple cheques and Niko Tiliopoulos doens&#039;t even get paid?  

Anyway, good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hang on, Cliff gets multiple cheques and Niko Tiliopoulos doens&#8217;t even get paid?  </p>
<p>Anyway, good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Goldacre</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/12/mediaslut-ideas-money-corporatewhore/comment-page-1/#comment-9578</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=340#comment-9578</guid>
		<description>thats really interesting tom, that cliff should say it was turned into &quot;the most depressing day&quot; without his permission, since from the mail i received it seems sky were looking for people to do &quot;the most depressing day&quot; from the outset, and they even had their answer ready before the academic produced the material (end of january payday).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats really interesting tom, that cliff should say it was turned into &#8220;the most depressing day&#8221; without his permission, since from the mail i received it seems sky were looking for people to do &#8220;the most depressing day&#8221; from the outset, and they even had their answer ready before the academic produced the material (end of january payday).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stever</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/12/mediaslut-ideas-money-corporatewhore/comment-page-1/#comment-9577</link>
		<dc:creator>stever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=340#comment-9577</guid>
		<description>hahaha Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahaha Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
