February 27th, 2007 by Ben Goldacre
in africa, bad science, matthias rath, nutritionists, patrick holford | 67 Comments »
Here’s a bit of a data dump of some of the critical news coverage that Patrick Holford’s “Food Is Better Than Medicine” tour of South Africa has picked up. They’re not very impressed in Africa by his claim that vitamin C is better than AZT, and Holford seems a bit conflicted over it himself. Here’s a typical news quote…
He has also denied news reports which he said implied he had been saying vitamin C was more effective in treating Aids than the ARV medication, AZT. “This is not true,” he said at the weekend. “I have never made this claim. “What I have said in the latest edition of my book, the New Optimum Nutrition Bible… is that ‘AZT, the first prescribable anti-HIV drug, is potentially harmful and proving less effective than vitamin C’.”
And reassuringly, meanwhile, Rath researcher Raxit Jariwalla seems to have backed down somewhat. Here is his Read the rest of this entry »
February 24th, 2007 by Ben Goldacre
in MMR, bad science | 61 Comments »
Ben Goldacre
Saturday February 24, 2007
The Guardian
It’s hard to know how you’d react in a crisis, Read the rest of this entry »
February 19th, 2007 by Ben Goldacre
in bad science, onanism, podcast | 23 Comments »
Here’s an mp3 of my talk today at the Brighton Science Festival, hundreds of people in a massive room, unexpectedly, but only very slightly intimidating:
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Or a download here…
Brighton Scifest 2007.mp3
That mobile phone noise stops whining a few minutes in, I’ve chopped the beginning off for now, if it’s irritating you then clickety click, Read the rest of this entry »
February 18th, 2007 by Ben Goldacre
in PhDs, doctors, and qualifications, adverts, bad science, channel 4, gillian mckeith, nutritionists, stifling criticism | 313 Comments »
For years, ‘Dr’ Gillian McKeith has used her title to sell TV shows, diet books and herbal sex pills. Now the Advertising Standards Authority has stepped in. Yet the real problem is not what she calls herself, but the mumbo-jumbo she dresses up as scientific fact, says Ben Goldacre
Ben Goldacre
Monday February 12, 2007
The Guardian
Call her the Awful Poo Lady, call her Dr Gillian McKeith PhD: she is an empire, a multi-millionaire, a phenomenon, a prime-time TV celebrity, a bestselling author. She has her own range of foods and mysterious powders, she has pills to give you an erection, and her face is in every health food store in the country. Scottish Conservative politicians want her to advise the government. The Soil Association gave her a prize for educating the public. And yet, Read the rest of this entry »
February 17th, 2007 by Ben Goldacre
in bad science, onanism | 19 Comments »
www.brightonscience.com/07home.php
If I was any good at pushing myself I might have mentioned this a bit earlier. Should be fun Read the rest of this entry »
February 17th, 2007 by Ben Goldacre
in bad science, religion | 109 Comments »
February 17th, 2007 by Ben Goldacre
in africa, bad science, matthias rath, nutritionists, patrick holford | 46 Comments »
Ben Goldacre
Saturday February 17, 2007
The Guardian
Look, I realise this is beginning to feel like one of those big containers where the Americans play Britney at you over and over again until you confess to crimes you haven’t committed. I’m totally ready to Read the rest of this entry »
February 16th, 2007 by Ben Goldacre
in bad science, patrick holford | 28 Comments »
Patrick Holford has now solicited his subscribers to write positively about him on his wikipedia page, in a mailout earlier today:
“Weirdness on Wikipedia – Ideally, debates on issues of scientific and medical contention should stick to the facts, but unfortunately those in the front line of paradigm shifts are usually subject to personal attacks, of which I’ve had many. I noticed a few on Wikipedia, which is meant to be the ‘people’s encyclopedia’ meaning that anyone can edit an entry. Unfortunately, some of the people who have been editing appear to be part of the pro-drug lobby. I did write to the moderator to straighten out some facts, but have had no reply, so I’ve decided to stay out of it. Of course, if you think there’s anything said that is wrong, or anything you’d like to add, feel free to do so.”
I think that means it’s likely to be vandalised on and off for a good long while to come. I’m perfectly serious when I say I don’t think it’s appropriate for readers of this to get involved.
en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patrick_Holford&oldid=108648937
As you can see, Holford’s wikipedia page is currently about a third full of material he has written attacking me, of all things. Read the rest of this entry »
February 16th, 2007 by Ben Goldacre
in bad science, patrick holford | 78 Comments »
From the letters page today: Read the rest of this entry »
February 10th, 2007 by Ben Goldacre
in bad science, gillian mckeith, nutritionists, references | 36 Comments »
Crikey, I’ve got a column in the BMJ!
BMJ 2007;334:292 (10 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.39118.546308.59
Observations
MEDIA WATCH
Tell us the truth about nutritionists
Media nutritionism distracts us from social inequality and the real causes of ill health
They’re certainly keen to praise themselves, but if you really wanted to do some primary prevention work in the community, would you start with the media nutritionists? The answer, for reasons of increasing seriousness, is no. Read the rest of this entry »
