<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Ageing Breadhead Guy Is Totally Angry With Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/2007/04/this-ageing-breadhead-guy-is-totally-angry-with-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/04/this-ageing-breadhead-guy-is-totally-angry-with-me/</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: diudiu</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/04/this-ageing-breadhead-guy-is-totally-angry-with-me/comment-page-3/#comment-30244</link>
		<dc:creator>diudiu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=398#comment-30244</guid>
		<description>&lt;a title=&quot;free shipping ugg&quot; href=&quot;http://www.freeshippingugg.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;free shipping ugg&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a title=&quot;free shipping ugg&quot; href=&quot;http://www.freeshippingugg.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;free shipping ugg&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="free shipping ugg" href="http://www.freeshippingugg.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>free shipping ugg</strong></a><br />
<a title="free shipping ugg" href="http://www.freeshippingugg.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>free shipping ugg</strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scigeeksez</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/04/this-ageing-breadhead-guy-is-totally-angry-with-me/comment-page-3/#comment-25172</link>
		<dc:creator>scigeeksez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=398#comment-25172</guid>
		<description>This is hilarious- i vow never to buy another bar of green and blacks chocolate ever again (maybe i will loose some weight at the same time without having to follow &quot;Dr&quot; Gillians advice!!) seriously though- just because she doesnt have &quot;qualifications&quot; and doesnt cite &quot;real journals&quot; this is one of the funniest things i have ever read- keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is hilarious- i vow never to buy another bar of green and blacks chocolate ever again (maybe i will loose some weight at the same time without having to follow &#8220;Dr&#8221; Gillians advice!!) seriously though- just because she doesnt have &#8220;qualifications&#8221; and doesnt cite &#8220;real journals&#8221; this is one of the funniest things i have ever read- keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yankee08</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/04/this-ageing-breadhead-guy-is-totally-angry-with-me/comment-page-3/#comment-20238</link>
		<dc:creator>Yankee08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 00:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=398#comment-20238</guid>
		<description>Gillian McKeath is a British PT Barnum: entertaining twaddle based in a modicum of facts.  BBC America has her show, You are What You Eat, running twice dailey over here.  We love it but we realize it is simply entertainment cloaked in bullhoohey.  Everytime Gillian says something pseudo-scientific that is jarringly wrong, I do wince but blow it off as &quot;needs of the business&quot; -the show must entertain &amp; throw in a &quot;fact&quot; or three. I realize with my stupendous education (a lowly Associate Degree in Science from a community college), I may not understand all the facts (ok, here I am roaring with laughter since a 10 year old 5th grader in the states would be questioning her science &#039;data&#039;...and God knows the US is education system has its own issues but let us not digress) but I, as well as most Americans, know television - we watch enough to anesthetize a rotwieller in heat over here. End result: eating more greens &amp; seeds..its all good, with enough processed cane sugar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gillian McKeath is a British PT Barnum: entertaining twaddle based in a modicum of facts.  BBC America has her show, You are What You Eat, running twice dailey over here.  We love it but we realize it is simply entertainment cloaked in bullhoohey.  Everytime Gillian says something pseudo-scientific that is jarringly wrong, I do wince but blow it off as &#8220;needs of the business&#8221; -the show must entertain &amp; throw in a &#8220;fact&#8221; or three. I realize with my stupendous education (a lowly Associate Degree in Science from a community college), I may not understand all the facts (ok, here I am roaring with laughter since a 10 year old 5th grader in the states would be questioning her science &#8216;data&#8217;&#8230;and God knows the US is education system has its own issues but let us not digress) but I, as well as most Americans, know television &#8211; we watch enough to anesthetize a rotwieller in heat over here. End result: eating more greens &amp; seeds..its all good, with enough processed cane sugar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeeT</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/04/this-ageing-breadhead-guy-is-totally-angry-with-me/comment-page-3/#comment-19893</link>
		<dc:creator>LeeT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 17:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=398#comment-19893</guid>
		<description>It is now Fairtrade Fortnight again. If you are not impressed with Mr Sams and the fact only one his chocolate bars is Fairtrade check out &quot;Divine&quot; and &quot;Traidcraft&quot; - two specialist Fairtrade companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is now Fairtrade Fortnight again. If you are not impressed with Mr Sams and the fact only one his chocolate bars is Fairtrade check out &#8220;Divine&#8221; and &#8220;Traidcraft&#8221; &#8211; two specialist Fairtrade companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris_Ch</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/04/this-ageing-breadhead-guy-is-totally-angry-with-me/comment-page-3/#comment-17551</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris_Ch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=398#comment-17551</guid>
		<description>The most dangerous thing about these people (as demonstrated here) is, i think, the kernal of truth at the heart of their criticisms. 

I&#039;m a doctor myself and i know it is true that many tens of thousands of people are harmed and even killed by medical science every year , a great deal of those by drugs and may are avoidable. It&#039;s also true that the drugs industry itself does some pretty poor science and has some questionable practices and alot of doctors are not entirely scruitinising of their studies. 

Despite this i believe we (doctors) do far more good than we do harm. (no i haven&#039;t any hard evidence for this).

It is my opinion that we should be just as hard on ourselves and the scientific community as we are on the alternative practioners and pseudoscientists that are exposed in this blog. I&#039;d like to think Ben would agree with this

Of course the drugs industry has some pretty powerful lawyers too..

What i am trying to say is that we should put our own house in order too and it would give these kinds of people less ammunition to pedal their poison / useless remedies and drive people away from medicine and science in general. The general public i&#039;m sure is very aggreived already by the harm medicine and science does to society (which is constantly in the newspapers) and increasingly so i think. Post modernism is very subversive. 

If we demonstrate the way forward, buy being scientifixally rigourous and accountable and perhaps less elitist the we would gain the trust of society at large.
And that i think is unassailable, even to these fools. As the saying goes people in glass houses shouldn&#039;t throw stones!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most dangerous thing about these people (as demonstrated here) is, i think, the kernal of truth at the heart of their criticisms. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m a doctor myself and i know it is true that many tens of thousands of people are harmed and even killed by medical science every year , a great deal of those by drugs and may are avoidable. It&#8217;s also true that the drugs industry itself does some pretty poor science and has some questionable practices and alot of doctors are not entirely scruitinising of their studies. </p>
<p>Despite this i believe we (doctors) do far more good than we do harm. (no i haven&#8217;t any hard evidence for this).</p>
<p>It is my opinion that we should be just as hard on ourselves and the scientific community as we are on the alternative practioners and pseudoscientists that are exposed in this blog. I&#8217;d like to think Ben would agree with this</p>
<p>Of course the drugs industry has some pretty powerful lawyers too..</p>
<p>What i am trying to say is that we should put our own house in order too and it would give these kinds of people less ammunition to pedal their poison / useless remedies and drive people away from medicine and science in general. The general public i&#8217;m sure is very aggreived already by the harm medicine and science does to society (which is constantly in the newspapers) and increasingly so i think. Post modernism is very subversive. </p>
<p>If we demonstrate the way forward, buy being scientifixally rigourous and accountable and perhaps less elitist the we would gain the trust of society at large.<br />
And that i think is unassailable, even to these fools. As the saying goes people in glass houses shouldn&#8217;t throw stones!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Goldacre</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/04/this-ageing-breadhead-guy-is-totally-angry-with-me/comment-page-3/#comment-14246</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 12:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=398#comment-14246</guid>
		<description>hahaaa just got this totally excellent email, in a very similar vein:

&quot;Pukawangi@aol.com&quot;  		 hide details	 1:05 pm (2 minutes ago) 
	to		bad.science@guardian.co.uk	 
	date		Jun 30, 2007 2:05 PM	 
	subject		Doctor Gillian Mckeith	 
	mailed-by		goldacre.net	 
To Ben Goldacre
 
Hmm your spoutings from your speaking anus are unusual. You must really be a sad wimp of the litter and 99 hundreder change hands.
Let have a look at your boring life. Are born out of wedlock? If so and you are the wimp, it is fair to call you a little bastard.
We may also call you little bastard hand exerciser. But thats enough of the showering praise on you. Lets get down to the nitty gritty of your hidden life. You must have been jilted at some time by a female who was a doctor. Yes this it, I have analysed your problem! Do you still live with your Mum? Are you afraid of the opposite sex, whoops! you may even be afraid of word sex, wow this must really be finding your  inadequacies. Could it be that name McKeith reminds you of a scottish person probably with a kilt, probably female but could be male, this person probably took your virginity one way or another &quot;every which way when&quot; and it changed your life forever. Now you do not know which way to turn. You dont know if you are Arthur or Martha. Their may be a clue in your name Ben. Look at the possibilities BEND OVER. BEN DOWN. BENT AS A NINE BOB NOTE.Maybe you should look at your own pathetic life and stop bad mouthing other people especially the good Doctor Gillian McKeith who is trying to help others who are not able to help thereselves. Your energises would be better supporting the good Doctor Gillian McKeith.
 
Mr Peter Wangi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahaaa just got this totally excellent email, in a very similar vein:</p>
<p>&#8220;Pukawangi@aol.com&#8221;  		 hide details	 1:05 pm (2 minutes ago)<br />
	to		<a href="mailto:bad.science@guardian.co.uk">bad.science@guardian.co.uk</a><br />
	date		Jun 30, 2007 2:05 PM<br />
	subject		Doctor Gillian Mckeith<br />
	mailed-by		<a href="http://goldacre.net" title="http://goldacre.net" target="_blank">goldacre.net</a><br />
To Ben Goldacre</p>
<p>Hmm your spoutings from your speaking anus are unusual. You must really be a sad wimp of the litter and 99 hundreder change hands.<br />
Let have a look at your boring life. Are born out of wedlock? If so and you are the wimp, it is fair to call you a little bastard.<br />
We may also call you little bastard hand exerciser. But thats enough of the showering praise on you. Lets get down to the nitty gritty of your hidden life. You must have been jilted at some time by a female who was a doctor. Yes this it, I have analysed your problem! Do you still live with your Mum? Are you afraid of the opposite sex, whoops! you may even be afraid of word sex, wow this must really be finding your  inadequacies. Could it be that name McKeith reminds you of a scottish person probably with a kilt, probably female but could be male, this person probably took your virginity one way or another &#8220;every which way when&#8221; and it changed your life forever. Now you do not know which way to turn. You dont know if you are Arthur or Martha. Their may be a clue in your name Ben. Look at the possibilities BEND OVER. BEN DOWN. BENT AS A NINE BOB NOTE.Maybe you should look at your own pathetic life and stop bad mouthing other people especially the good Doctor Gillian McKeith who is trying to help others who are not able to help thereselves. Your energises would be better supporting the good Doctor Gillian McKeith.</p>
<p>Mr Peter Wangi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raygirvan</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/04/this-ageing-breadhead-guy-is-totally-angry-with-me/comment-page-3/#comment-12711</link>
		<dc:creator>raygirvan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=398#comment-12711</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s complicated: down to delivery mechanism. For whatever reasons, smoking X amount of tobacco delivers a much lower dose of nicotine than eating the same amount. There are other subleties: nicotine being an alkaloid, pH controls the chemistry; there&#039;s been a deal of discussion about how many modern cigarettes are tailored to raise the pH to deliver the more rapidly bioavailoable freebase form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s complicated: down to delivery mechanism. For whatever reasons, smoking X amount of tobacco delivers a much lower dose of nicotine than eating the same amount. There are other subleties: nicotine being an alkaloid, pH controls the chemistry; there&#8217;s been a deal of discussion about how many modern cigarettes are tailored to raise the pH to deliver the more rapidly bioavailoable freebase form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/04/this-ageing-breadhead-guy-is-totally-angry-with-me/comment-page-3/#comment-12709</link>
		<dc:creator>j</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=398#comment-12709</guid>
		<description>Thanks - that&#039;s interesting.  So smoking tobaco, chewing it etc. limits the nicotine dose?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks &#8211; that&#8217;s interesting.  So smoking tobaco, chewing it etc. limits the nicotine dose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quark</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/04/this-ageing-breadhead-guy-is-totally-angry-with-me/comment-page-3/#comment-12707</link>
		<dc:creator>quark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=398#comment-12707</guid>
		<description>Nicotine is actually quite toxic (the lethal dose is 40-60 mg). Eating tobacco is therefore not recommended. I assume that when tobacco is smoked the dose simply isn&#039;t high enough to cause any accute toxic effects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicotine is actually quite toxic (the lethal dose is 40-60 mg). Eating tobacco is therefore not recommended. I assume that when tobacco is smoked the dose simply isn&#8217;t high enough to cause any accute toxic effects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raygirvan</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/04/this-ageing-breadhead-guy-is-totally-angry-with-me/comment-page-3/#comment-12705</link>
		<dc:creator>raygirvan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=398#comment-12705</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;fruit such as pears and peaches&lt;/i&gt;

Not likely. We don&#039;t touch those hawthorn and chokecherry plants with their cyanogenic glycosides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>fruit such as pears and peaches</i></p>
<p>Not likely. We don&#8217;t touch those hawthorn and chokecherry plants with their cyanogenic glycosides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/04/this-ageing-breadhead-guy-is-totally-angry-with-me/comment-page-3/#comment-12704</link>
		<dc:creator>j</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=398#comment-12704</guid>
		<description>btw, re. nicotine - I thought that (aside from being addictive) it was one of the less harmful components of tobacco?  Or have I got things mixed up (don&#039;t smoke, so never really paid much attention...)

Oh yeah, and cadbury&#039;s - green and black&#039;s parent co. - is going to face prosecution over their problems with salmonella...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw, re. nicotine &#8211; I thought that (aside from being addictive) it was one of the less harmful components of tobacco?  Or have I got things mixed up (don&#8217;t smoke, so never really paid much attention&#8230;)</p>
<p>Oh yeah, and cadbury&#8217;s &#8211; green and black&#8217;s parent co. &#8211; is going to face prosecution over their problems with salmonella&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quark</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/04/this-ageing-breadhead-guy-is-totally-angry-with-me/comment-page-3/#comment-12703</link>
		<dc:creator>quark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=398#comment-12703</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, if people think that solanine is the same as nicotine, they may either conclude that tomatoes are dangerous or that tobacco is harmless.

On the Nomato website there is a link to the Arthritis Nightshades Research Foundation website (www.noarthritis.com/).
I stupidly thought it may contain some real information.
The &quot;I tried the Diet and it didn&#039;t work&quot; section is truly funny. It says:
&quot;You are sensitive to these foods, even though you have gotten a little potato starch or paprika in canned soups (don&#039;t forget to read the labels).  Maybe you are still eating yogurt for &quot;good health&quot; (some brands contain potato starch), or margarine (palmitate ester vitamin A), or a little low-fat milk on breakfast cereal every morning (vitamins A and D), or eating a lot of fresh fruits every day (may get a batch with too much synthetic pesticide)... Try canned fruit such as pears and peaches for awhile but be aware that many have corn syrup added as a sweetener and it may happen to contain the Bt insecticide gene (see Bt gene on this website).&quot;  

Oh - I think I&#039;m feeling a bit sensitive to BT today! Maybe I shouldn&#039;t have eaten that tobacco salad...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, if people think that solanine is the same as nicotine, they may either conclude that tomatoes are dangerous or that tobacco is harmless.</p>
<p>On the Nomato website there is a link to the Arthritis Nightshades Research Foundation website (<a href="http://www.noarthritis.com/" title="http://www.noarthritis.com/" target="_blank">www.noarthritis.com/</a>).<br />
I stupidly thought it may contain some real information.<br />
The &#8220;I tried the Diet and it didn&#8217;t work&#8221; section is truly funny. It says:<br />
&#8220;You are sensitive to these foods, even though you have gotten a little potato starch or paprika in canned soups (don&#8217;t forget to read the labels).  Maybe you are still eating yogurt for &#8220;good health&#8221; (some brands contain potato starch), or margarine (palmitate ester vitamin A), or a little low-fat milk on breakfast cereal every morning (vitamins A and D), or eating a lot of fresh fruits every day (may get a batch with too much synthetic pesticide)&#8230; Try canned fruit such as pears and peaches for awhile but be aware that many have corn syrup added as a sweetener and it may happen to contain the Bt insecticide gene (see Bt gene on this website).&#8221;  </p>
<p>Oh &#8211; I think I&#8217;m feeling a bit sensitive to BT today! Maybe I shouldn&#8217;t have eaten that tobacco salad&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evidencebasedeating</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/04/this-ageing-breadhead-guy-is-totally-angry-with-me/comment-page-3/#comment-12689</link>
		<dc:creator>evidencebasedeating</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 20:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=398#comment-12689</guid>
		<description>Its not a great idea to pursue ad hominem attacks on the woo brigade - no need to stoop to their level. 

But wouldn&#039;t it be interesting to do a &#039;citation map&#039; approach to the woo brigade - just so the public can see the links between woo therapists/ woo endorsers/woo companies/ woo journos and woo mags....

one wonders if the public would be so accepting if they could see how meeja woo nutritionists groom their journo contacts in broadcast and print media to push their gruesome book/ website/ supplements/ conferences ad nauseam...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its not a great idea to pursue ad hominem attacks on the woo brigade &#8211; no need to stoop to their level. </p>
<p>But wouldn&#8217;t it be interesting to do a &#8216;citation map&#8217; approach to the woo brigade &#8211; just so the public can see the links between woo therapists/ woo endorsers/woo companies/ woo journos and woo mags&#8230;.</p>
<p>one wonders if the public would be so accepting if they could see how meeja woo nutritionists groom their journo contacts in broadcast and print media to push their gruesome book/ website/ supplements/ conferences ad nauseam&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Goldacre</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/04/this-ageing-breadhead-guy-is-totally-angry-with-me/comment-page-3/#comment-12681</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=398#comment-12681</guid>
		<description>what i find interesting is that this is the kind of basic error that persists not just in a world that has no interest in real science (it is a marketing tool) but more than that, it persists in a world where there is no possibility for critical appraisal of ideas. we&#039;ve seen above how criags responds to the critical appraisal of ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what i find interesting is that this is the kind of basic error that persists not just in a world that has no interest in real science (it is a marketing tool) but more than that, it persists in a world where there is no possibility for critical appraisal of ideas. we&#8217;ve seen above how criags responds to the critical appraisal of ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raygirvan</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/04/this-ageing-breadhead-guy-is-totally-angry-with-me/comment-page-3/#comment-12680</link>
		<dc:creator>raygirvan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=398#comment-12680</guid>
		<description>BTW, I just posted a blog entry, &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://apothdrawer.blogspot.com/2007_04_01_archive.html#7451409587374661989&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bad plant science&lt;/a&gt; with pictures of the radically different structures of nicotine and solanine. I&#039;m really interested to know: is this an honest but ill-informed mistake, or deliberate propaganda to misrepresent vegetables as containing nicotine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, I just posted a blog entry, <a HREF="http://apothdrawer.blogspot.com/2007_04_01_archive.html#7451409587374661989" rel="nofollow">Bad plant science</a> with pictures of the radically different structures of nicotine and solanine. I&#8217;m really interested to know: is this an honest but ill-informed mistake, or deliberate propaganda to misrepresent vegetables as containing nicotine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nanobot</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/04/this-ageing-breadhead-guy-is-totally-angry-with-me/comment-page-3/#comment-12675</link>
		<dc:creator>Nanobot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 11:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=398#comment-12675</guid>
		<description>&#039;Chiral is a process by which ingredients are purified to their most natural state.&#039;

Oh

My

God

Run for the hills!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Chiral is a process by which ingredients are purified to their most natural state.&#8217;</p>
<p>Oh</p>
<p>My</p>
<p>God</p>
<p>Run for the hills!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amoebic vodka</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/04/this-ageing-breadhead-guy-is-totally-angry-with-me/comment-page-3/#comment-12674</link>
		<dc:creator>amoebic vodka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 11:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=398#comment-12674</guid>
		<description>@raygirvan

By that logic, does it mean water (H2O) and peroxide (H2O2) are also the same thing? After all there&#039;s only one extra oxygen atom in there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@raygirvan</p>
<p>By that logic, does it mean water (H2O) and peroxide (H2O2) are also the same thing? After all there&#8217;s only one extra oxygen atom in there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raygirvan</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/04/this-ageing-breadhead-guy-is-totally-angry-with-me/comment-page-3/#comment-12667</link>
		<dc:creator>raygirvan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 02:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=398#comment-12667</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;God forbid the woomeisters ever get a wiff of chirality&lt;/i&gt;.

They have. If we&#039;re worrying about people calling themselves &quot;Dr&quot;, what about this one who aspires to royalty. Check out &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.fountainofhealth.com/newsletters/2004/sep2004.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Health Queen&#039;s Fountain of Healthy News&lt;/a&gt; and &quot;Why is Chirality important to skin care?&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>God forbid the woomeisters ever get a wiff of chirality</i>.</p>
<p>They have. If we&#8217;re worrying about people calling themselves &#8220;Dr&#8221;, what about this one who aspires to royalty. Check out <a HREF="http://www.fountainofhealth.com/newsletters/2004/sep2004.php" rel="nofollow">The Health Queen&#8217;s Fountain of Healthy News</a> and &#8220;Why is Chirality important to skin care?&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raygirvan</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/04/this-ageing-breadhead-guy-is-totally-angry-with-me/comment-page-3/#comment-12666</link>
		<dc:creator>raygirvan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 02:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=398#comment-12666</guid>
		<description>Ah, forgot to point out this is a nice combination of duff science and ad hom. This &quot;nicotine = solanine&quot; guy is Chairman of the Soil Association and, according to his website, a keen hands-on gardener. Amazing that he should be promoting such a fuckwit error about plant chemistry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, forgot to point out this is a nice combination of duff science and ad hom. This &#8220;nicotine = solanine&#8221; guy is Chairman of the Soil Association and, according to his website, a keen hands-on gardener. Amazing that he should be promoting such a fuckwit error about plant chemistry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nanobot</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/04/this-ageing-breadhead-guy-is-totally-angry-with-me/comment-page-3/#comment-12663</link>
		<dc:creator>Nanobot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 21:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=398#comment-12663</guid>
		<description>Oh it doesn&#039;t matter anymore it seems. Why do we bother having chemistry at all?

God forbid the woomeisters ever get a wiff of chirality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh it doesn&#8217;t matter anymore it seems. Why do we bother having chemistry at all?</p>
<p>God forbid the woomeisters ever get a wiff of chirality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
