The MoD have known for sometime wind power has been interfereing with their RADAR systems.
The government have stop them closing Wind Turbines.

Most people are poor obervers of their environment let alone knowing they are being zapped. And on this basis they assume that those of us who know there are high levels of radiation in the area are mentally defective.

If logic could shout very loudly the only mentally
defection is on the part of the people who can`t see. Just like going down the mine shaft with or without a canary.. By the time the person without the canary sences have worked it out. They are probably beyond being saved from the mine shaft.(Gas)
Yet they shout that whatever its can`t get me or so it seems the next generation. Like any drug addict they, might in fact love the radiation, as it can over stiumlate the body and they can get a hype. (Without taking any chemical) combineing chemical toxins and electropollution can make it even better. The next generation may became oversensitive (like children who had parents who drank too much)”They Blindly Go Where No Man Has Been Before; Or so They Think”!

If you measure the radiation on a flat screen monitor and it only says 4 units: However if there
is such a thing as a multi demensional reading of a
1000 units. Which would you believe was safe?

+ the fact you were unable to feel the energy:
Our equipment on the whole will be installed using a flat screen moniter:
Know what your dealing with on all levels.

Don`t be a fool and think it safe if you can`t feel or see it. And know that government and industry have created a need for technology: If it was gone tomorrow, then what?

Total melt down and exodus from biopro begins – distributors, vendors and their most important alliance… George Carlo. Biopro’s best hope for credible verification gone! The best part, he has abandoned biopro and throwing them under the biopro bus in an ironic twist of truthful fate.

Read about it here: bioproisascam.blogspot.com

This company Biopro offers outrageously priced products that can not be proven. In fact, with the help of the fraud Dr. they have launched their OWN 3rd party sites to validate their own claims!

The level of scam and fraud is unprecedented here and this Dr. / Trail Lawyer (make sense now knowing he’s a trial lawyer?) all need to be stopped and held accountable before another corporation is sued for trump accusations!

If you were scammed by Biopro then it is your duty to report them to the FTC.

More info at:
www.handheldlearning2007.com

Dr Carlo may also be present as will other experts concerned with the use of wireless technologies in the education and schools sector.

The call for papers and presentation proposals is open until July 16th and early registration discounts are available until 31st July including subsidised places for eligible schools and charities. Media passes are also available.

The event is the worlds largest conference on mobility in learning drawing an audience of over 600 delegates.

The Guardian Link (the ICT in education supplement from the Guardian) is the media sponsor.

Graham

‘Cpu’ stands for computer…
And well, obviously I was not using a CRT computer screen as I CANNOT USE THEM AT ALL. In both places there were only flat screen screens. It’s just something else, such as the brand of the computer or screen, the fact that it is earth ground or not, etc…I don’t know the reason really, I just tell you the facts.
And as for the photocopy machine, I always close the flap so…

I’m not sure that one can jump from an association of your symptoms with technology to your symptoms being cause by EMF. The flickering of the old CRT monitors can be very bad for headaches. Could the headaches not just be that you are unusually susceptible to the flickering of CRT screens? I checked EpilepsyAction (www.epilepsy.org.uk/info/employers/computers.html) who seem to feel that the big thing about LCD/TFT screens is that they don’t flicker. Might this not be the trigger for your headaches? A photocopier machine is a pretty bright, flickery source of light, this may well fall into the same category.

Perhaps one of the medics on this forum can suggest an alternative cause for the rash.

I’m not clear what a CPU screen is.

You say that you get tachycardia from your mobile phone. I hadn’t heard of this before, but it sounds kind of different. Do mobile phones give you a headache? Do photocopier machines give you tachycardia?

Nothing about your symptoms strikes me as unreasonable. I’m happy to accept that they may well be linked to technology. What I don’t understand is why you are so sure that your symptoms are caused by EMF. As Ben points out ad nauseum, there have been ~30 published studies on this and the evidence is pretty solid that electrosensitivity does not exist. They could be wrong, but unless I’m missing something, I don’t see how you can feel so sure, particularly when it seems to me there are other explanations that don’t have a bunch of research against them.

Again, I think we all acknowledge that these symptoms are real.

The fact that I get massive headaches and skin rashes when I use a conventional CRT computer screen, a regular TV, a photocopy machine and of course a mobile phone (+tachycardia)…AND that I have got no symptoms at all when I use flat screen TVs or cpu screens kind of makes me think that the technology is involved…then obviously the EMF.

Last week again, simple fact, I went to a library to use a computer with Internet. I couldn’t stay 5 min bcz of headaches. Then, straight after, I went to the cyber cafe I always go around the corner, and I stayed 2h in front of the computer. How am I supposed to explain it?

Would you say that it’s just a coincidence? that I maybe associate libraries to schools and therefore to a chaotic and stressful education that I have had in the past…and the relationship with my parents living in another country blah blah… Well I am sorry. I just believe it comes from the technology that I had in front of me at that time. As simple as that!

I’m afraid that scientists must be free to doubt, if not, then we would not be able to do any science.

About 2 years ago, I have had to change career to work as a teacher in London in order to avoid working with a computer all day.

I don’t know what to say, I am neither a scientific or a lobbyst or whoever with any kind of power. The only thing is that my symptoms are here, for no reason, at least none that I am aware of and nobody could cure me so far. If you knew me, you would see that I am not depressed, I am a very happy and enthusiastic person. But still, some people reject the facts and do not care at all about this fairly recent condition that is EHS.

What don’t we meet up sometime in London? We could have a coffee or a beer and you would see by yourself that I am not an alien, that I am just a normal human being suffering from something you obviously do not know.

alex

The numbers of mobiles has certainly not tripled in the last 2 years, if they had, the networks would have collapsed… i’m a telecoms engineer and i know what kind of network capacity margins are built into these things. They would have had to rebuild most of the fixed side of the mobile networks.

Re. the letter reproduced above
“Pathology and experimental findings support a mechanistic underpinning: an environmentally induced genetic change that renders daughter cells to carry membrane sensitivity characteristics with most symptoms directly or indirectly the result of consequent disrupt of intercellular communication.”

Is he claiming that the EM Radiation from mobiles / masts / wi-fi etc is strong enough to cause changes in DNA? or am i interpreting that wrong?

You mean no detail at all? Seems a fairly low bar. And, anyway, why not? It’s a scientific question so the answer should be as detailed (and more importantly rigorous) as it needs to be to settle the matter. Why does the BBC insist on treating its viewers as morons?

I’m assuming that these papers exist but I just can’t find them. Surely “the world’s foremost authority on wireless safety” must have published loads on the subject?? otherwise he’d be a complete charlatan wouldn’t he??

“It is noteworthy that concurrently in the past 24 months, the penetration of mobile phones has tripled globally, from one billion to three billion”

Not true that phone usage has grown so quick, best estimates are a bit less than 2.7bn now up from around 2bn 24 months ago (I know a man at SonyEricsson), but most other places will give similar numbers, or less. Not sure what “penetration” has to do with this either.

I haven’t had a chance to go pubmed diving yet and I was wondering if anyone could point me to some good papers to start off with.