www.slotonlines.com

harry
www.sportsbookteaser.com

tunga
www.gamblenotes.com

can you really expect us to sit and read a sentence like…

“Basically, if you think about it, this should resonate deeply with your understanding of life and diseases and you should know this to be true. If you just sit with the above statement that’s all you need to know and understand. The consequences are then obvious.”

…and take you seriously?

Even Paul McKenna would struggle keeping a straight face with that one!

Keep up the good work Mr Chappell, a few more years reading drivel like this and even that moron at Buckingham Palace will begin to doubt.

And to think we waste taxes on this.

I think an effective test would be too infect them all with leprosy and see who made it to the chemist!

It’s funny that when it comes to money no homeopath seems to want to abandon simple arithmetic. I often say I have no objection to homeopaths as long as they are paid a homeopathic salary. And what about the ecological damage they are causing whenever any of their medicine is disposed of down the loo? It’s shaken, it’s diluted, there’s more of it getting more potent. The fish of the sea must be as high as a hippy at Glastonbury. It’s about time Greenpeace looked at these cowboys.

Hmm..encouraging. I really wish there were a hell.

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot! I’ve been a physician for a number of years, and that statement is, well, a lie. A damned lie, really. I wish there were a Hell for this quack to rot in, but as a second alternative, perhaps he could get acute myelogenous leukemia with the typical Philadelphia chromosome translocation and try treating himself. No need for the STAT protein inhibitor Gleevec which was designed based on the KNOWN mechanism of the illness and is capable of inducing complete response. Nah…let him have some water instead.

Anyone with a brain can see that allopaths treat symptoms and not the cause of a disease.

So one question that might come to mind is how come chronic diseases are epidemic diseases which means they are infectious? And if so how are they infectious? While you may not know, for example, that some breast cancers have an 80% certainty of occurring in the female children of the mother who has it, you must know that generally chronic disease processes run in families. Isn’t that proof enough that they are epidemic?

This is garbage on so many levels. Logically, factually and grammatically diseased.

www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/08/will-homeopathy-and-itunes-cure-aids.html

A commenter called Rick read my post and then complained to the Dorset TC. It looks like they may have positively acknowledged the complaint, but no more details…

“Of course the idea that there was good and bad science is very naive and a primitive form of psychology. You are good and I am bad is three-year-old psychology. Just because a president of the United States uses it does not infer that it is grown up language. Such prejudices infer that the person has not read a single philosopher such as David Hume.”

Where to start? Firstly the language: why ‘was’ and not ‘is’? Why would anyone argue ‘YOU are good and I am bad’, not the other wa round? As has been mentioned before, infer and imply are confused twice.

If these sound like petty complaints, well, they are, but they indicate a wider problem with him, further demonstrated by his arguments – firstly assuming that because Ben writes ‘bad science’ he has a black and white view of things and that this is childish, when if he’d read or listened to Ben speak he’d have seen measured argument and an acceptance that homepathic remedies can have a placebo effect which is ver beneficial, as well as criticism of Big Pharma on occasions. Then the infantile and nonsensical Bush bashing, as if scientists only decided to criticise homeopathy when Bush invaded Iraq. Finally he desperately crowbars David Hume into the whole sorry mess, which I simply have no explanation for.

All of it, the misjudged political and literary references, the faulty logic, the smash and grab raid on the English language to find ‘clever’ words and never mind what they mean; it all smacks of a seriously underpar intellect trying to paper over the cracks with arrogance, a bad thesaurus and sentences so long and loopy he hopes nobody as the time to read them thouroughly. So if you think about it, it’s hardly likely he’d have a sensible medical idea in his head either.

www.peterchappell.com/contact.php

However, whois reports that his site is administered in the UK:

Domain name: peterchappell.com

Administrative Contact:
mservers
Desmond Melvin (des@mservers.co.uk)
+44.1202709602
Fax: +44.-
12 Widdicombe Ave
Poole, DORSET BH14 9QW
GB

Technical Contact:
mservers
Desmond Melvin (des@mservers.co.uk)
+44.1202709602
Fax: +44.-
12 Widdicombe Ave
Poole, DORSET BH14 9QW
GB

Registrant Contact:
mservers
Desmond Melvin (des@mservers.co.uk)
+44.1202709602
Fax: +44.-
12 Widdicombe Ave
Poole, DORSET BH14 9QW
GB

Does this mean we could make a complaint to Dorset Trading Standards about a Cancer Act breach?

Anybody have any experience doing this sort of thing? It’s Friday and I’m happy to bash out a letter in my lunch hour if the consensus is that it’s worth the effort.

Andrew.

“Ooops
Sorry but this page has either been moved or no longer exists.”

andrew clegg @ 40: go to teekblog.blogspot.com/2007/09/clear-and-present-danger-homeo-pathetic.html, where you’ll find a link to the pdf (www.vitalremedies.com/docs/new-remedies-cancer-sept-2007.pdf)

I have CLL – that’s Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia for everybody but Ben, and non-medics.

I beg to differ with the numpty who says that there is no such thing as chronic disease. Ask my consultant.

I love pointing out these pages to people too. There tends to be a number of nutritionist, alternative treehugging types hanging around in various forums (Fora?) that I delight in pointing in this direction.