<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White coat protest on hybrid embryo research bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/white-coat-protest-on-embryo-research-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/white-coat-protest-on-embryo-research-bill/</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:31:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: wokao123</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/white-coat-protest-on-embryo-research-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-28253</link>
		<dc:creator>wokao123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=676#comment-28253</guid>
		<description>i like this article &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linksolondon.co.uk/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Links of London&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Links of London &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linksolondon.co.uk/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Links of London&lt;/a&gt; Links of London &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.classictiffany.co.uk/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tiffany&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Tiffany &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.classictiffany.co.uk/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tiffany&lt;/a&gt; Tiffany &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.classicedhardy.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ED hardy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ED hardy &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.classicedhardy.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ED hardy&lt;/a&gt; UGG BOOTS &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cheap-uggs-boots.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;UGG BOOTS&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; UGG BOOTS &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cheap-uggs-boots.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;UGG BOOTS&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like this article <a href="http://www.linksolondon.co.uk/" rel="nofollow"><strong>Links of London</strong></a> Links of London <a href="http://www.linksolondon.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">Links of London</a> Links of London <a href="http://www.classictiffany.co.uk/" rel="nofollow"><strong>Tiffany</strong></a> Tiffany <a href="http://www.classictiffany.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">Tiffany</a> Tiffany <a href="http://www.classicedhardy.com/" rel="nofollow"><strong>ED hardy</strong></a> ED hardy <a href="http://www.classicedhardy.com/" rel="nofollow">ED hardy</a> UGG BOOTS <a href="http://www.cheap-uggs-boots.com/" rel="nofollow"><strong>UGG BOOTS</strong></a> UGG BOOTS <a href="http://www.cheap-uggs-boots.com/" rel="nofollow">UGG BOOTS</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: holly_and_ally</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/white-coat-protest-on-embryo-research-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-21118</link>
		<dc:creator>holly_and_ally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=676#comment-21118</guid>
		<description>Well,
me andd ally think it 
has positive sides and negative sides such as....

If in the right hands it could save millions who have incurable diseases such as parkinsons and diabetes

However...
if in the wrong hands,
new dangerous specious could be formed.Scientists have already tried too produce and have rabbits that glow in the dark and a mouse with a human ear. Now what is the point of that it is just stupid!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well,<br />
me andd ally think it<br />
has positive sides and negative sides such as&#8230;.</p>
<p>If in the right hands it could save millions who have incurable diseases such as parkinsons and diabetes</p>
<p>However&#8230;<br />
if in the wrong hands,<br />
new dangerous specious could be formed.Scientists have already tried too produce and have rabbits that glow in the dark and a mouse with a human ear. Now what is the point of that it is just stupid!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: germslayer</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/white-coat-protest-on-embryo-research-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-20776</link>
		<dc:creator>germslayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 21:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=676#comment-20776</guid>
		<description>Good entry, Teek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good entry, Teek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teek</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/white-coat-protest-on-embryo-research-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-20774</link>
		<dc:creator>Teek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 07:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=676#comment-20774</guid>
		<description>I was there, as they say...

Ben, didn&#039;t spot you, your disguise must have been better than i was expecting...!

anyway i&#039;ve started to blog about the day and what i experienced whilst at Parliament, Part One is here: 

http://teekblog.blogspot.com/2008/05/embryos-and-parlaiment-part-one.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was there, as they say&#8230;</p>
<p>Ben, didn&#8217;t spot you, your disguise must have been better than i was expecting&#8230;!</p>
<p>anyway i&#8217;ve started to blog about the day and what i experienced whilst at Parliament, Part One is here: </p>
<p><a href="http://teekblog.blogspot.com/2008/05/embryos-and-parlaiment-part-one.html" rel="nofollow">http://teekblog.blogspot.com/2008/05/embryos-and-parlaiment-part-one.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Aust</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/white-coat-protest-on-embryo-research-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-20768</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Aust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 19:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=676#comment-20768</guid>
		<description>Another reason there are many more current treatments with adult stem cells is that many of these therapies, or versions of them, were around before we really understood they had to do with stem cells - they were then called &quot;cell transplants&quot;. For instance, one can classify a  bone marrow transplant as an &quot;adult stem cell therapy&quot; since it relies on bone marrow stem cells in the transplanted bone marrow to repopulate the recipient&#039;s marrow with healthy cells in all the bone-marrow derived cell lineages (red cells, platelets, white cells).

Since &quot;adult stem cell therapies&quot; are often an outgrowth of transplantation ideas they are (relatively) well worked out, risks assessed, tissue typing and immune rejection issues already thought through, etc etc. 
In addition, an adult stem cell has already made SOME critical &quot;fate decisions&quot;. Thus its potential risk of turning into something you DON&#039;T want it to (rather than what you do want it to), like a tumour, is probably less than for a &quot;pluripotent&quot; embryonic stem (ES) cell.

Essentially, the difference is that ES cells offer &quot;total possibility&quot;, but it is a long way off. Adult stem cells offer more restricted, though therapeutically very exciting, possibilities, but are much nearer to reality. 

However, this is hardly a reason to impede research into one, as Bush did by banning ES cell research w federal funding. 

By the way, government-goal-driven management of the direction of science research (which is what the funding policy of the last 15 years has increasingly pushed) has a rather bad reputation among the actual scientists. See the references cited at the top of David Colquhoun&#039;s thread &lt;a href=&quot;http://dcscience.net/?p=226&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another reason there are many more current treatments with adult stem cells is that many of these therapies, or versions of them, were around before we really understood they had to do with stem cells &#8211; they were then called &#8220;cell transplants&#8221;. For instance, one can classify a  bone marrow transplant as an &#8220;adult stem cell therapy&#8221; since it relies on bone marrow stem cells in the transplanted bone marrow to repopulate the recipient&#8217;s marrow with healthy cells in all the bone-marrow derived cell lineages (red cells, platelets, white cells).</p>
<p>Since &#8220;adult stem cell therapies&#8221; are often an outgrowth of transplantation ideas they are (relatively) well worked out, risks assessed, tissue typing and immune rejection issues already thought through, etc etc.<br />
In addition, an adult stem cell has already made SOME critical &#8220;fate decisions&#8221;. Thus its potential risk of turning into something you DON&#8217;T want it to (rather than what you do want it to), like a tumour, is probably less than for a &#8220;pluripotent&#8221; embryonic stem (ES) cell.</p>
<p>Essentially, the difference is that ES cells offer &#8220;total possibility&#8221;, but it is a long way off. Adult stem cells offer more restricted, though therapeutically very exciting, possibilities, but are much nearer to reality. </p>
<p>However, this is hardly a reason to impede research into one, as Bush did by banning ES cell research w federal funding. </p>
<p>By the way, government-goal-driven management of the direction of science research (which is what the funding policy of the last 15 years has increasingly pushed) has a rather bad reputation among the actual scientists. See the references cited at the top of David Colquhoun&#8217;s thread <a href="http://dcscience.net/?p=226" rel="nofollow">here</a> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the grimreader</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/white-coat-protest-on-embryo-research-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-20763</link>
		<dc:creator>the grimreader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 07:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=676#comment-20763</guid>
		<description>Woodbine, thanks very much for the response!

Dr Aust, it strikes me that Ben&#039;s blog will reach many more people than a demo will!  And us fruitcakes are interested in listening to what he has to say!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woodbine, thanks very much for the response!</p>
<p>Dr Aust, it strikes me that Ben&#8217;s blog will reach many more people than a demo will!  And us fruitcakes are interested in listening to what he has to say!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Aust</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/white-coat-protest-on-embryo-research-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-20761</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Aust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 22:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=676#comment-20761</guid>
		<description>Speaking as a mad (ish) scientist, I can confirm that white coats are still &lt;i&gt;de rigeur&lt;/i&gt; (and indeed required by safety regs) in the labs. The news coats mostly have elasiticated cuffs which I really hate.

Quite different in the hospitals: doctors are now required to have short-sleeved shirts (hence &quot;bare below the elbow&quot;) and definitely no white coats. Dangling sleeves, you see. Ties are also frowned upon for similar reasons.

An interesting point is that in our  local cafe (midway between the labs and the hospital) us science-oids are expressly banned from entering wearing white coats, while the hosital folk regularly sit there in their scrubs and uniforms, stethoscopes hanging. I even see (operating) theatre caps. Go figure.

By the way, the BBC is running a story &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7392692.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; suggesting the MRC (Medical Research Council) would like people &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; to demonstrate in case it &quot;gives the wrong message&quot; and interferes with their softly-softly &quot;quiet word in the right ear&quot; campaign for the bill. I personally think this is same rather craven sort of line the Great &#039;n&#039; Good of science (e.g. the Royal Society) have taken on far too much pseudoscience over the last few years, but perhaps that&#039;s just me.

I can believe that just a bunch of wacky-looking scientists may not have the moral force of a bunch of seriously ill people in wheelchairs asking for the bill to go through to progress the research, but a joint demo of patients and their relatives, scientists in lab coats and doctors in scrubs would, to my mind, make the point eloquently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking as a mad (ish) scientist, I can confirm that white coats are still <i>de rigeur</i> (and indeed required by safety regs) in the labs. The news coats mostly have elasiticated cuffs which I really hate.</p>
<p>Quite different in the hospitals: doctors are now required to have short-sleeved shirts (hence &#8220;bare below the elbow&#8221;) and definitely no white coats. Dangling sleeves, you see. Ties are also frowned upon for similar reasons.</p>
<p>An interesting point is that in our  local cafe (midway between the labs and the hospital) us science-oids are expressly banned from entering wearing white coats, while the hosital folk regularly sit there in their scrubs and uniforms, stethoscopes hanging. I even see (operating) theatre caps. Go figure.</p>
<p>By the way, the BBC is running a story <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7392692.stm" rel="nofollow">here</a> suggesting the MRC (Medical Research Council) would like people <i>not</i> to demonstrate in case it &#8220;gives the wrong message&#8221; and interferes with their softly-softly &#8220;quiet word in the right ear&#8221; campaign for the bill. I personally think this is same rather craven sort of line the Great &#8216;n&#8217; Good of science (e.g. the Royal Society) have taken on far too much pseudoscience over the last few years, but perhaps that&#8217;s just me.</p>
<p>I can believe that just a bunch of wacky-looking scientists may not have the moral force of a bunch of seriously ill people in wheelchairs asking for the bill to go through to progress the research, but a joint demo of patients and their relatives, scientists in lab coats and doctors in scrubs would, to my mind, make the point eloquently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: woodbine</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/white-coat-protest-on-embryo-research-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-20759</link>
		<dc:creator>woodbine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 12:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=676#comment-20759</guid>
		<description>Grimreader,

re. Lord Alton&#039;s objections.

If you happen to think that embryonic stem cell research is a useful and valid area of research, I imagine you might have a problem supporting Lord Alton&#039;s objection to the NHS funding embryonic stem cell research.

re. the lack of therapeutic applications from embryonic stem cell research. 

This is a volume issue, quite simply becasue of the ban on embryonic stem cell research in the US there is far more research undertaken on Adult Stem Cells. Unsurprisingly, there has been more success from Adult Stem Cell research. It is of course irrational to suggest that embryonic cells are somehow less scientifically valid than adult cells, or that the research of the scientists using embryonic cells is somehow less effective. (Maybe they have a Mengele-like propensity for evil that makes them poor scientists). 

I think you can judge for yourself if this is a misleading argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grimreader,</p>
<p>re. Lord Alton&#8217;s objections.</p>
<p>If you happen to think that embryonic stem cell research is a useful and valid area of research, I imagine you might have a problem supporting Lord Alton&#8217;s objection to the NHS funding embryonic stem cell research.</p>
<p>re. the lack of therapeutic applications from embryonic stem cell research. </p>
<p>This is a volume issue, quite simply becasue of the ban on embryonic stem cell research in the US there is far more research undertaken on Adult Stem Cells. Unsurprisingly, there has been more success from Adult Stem Cell research. It is of course irrational to suggest that embryonic cells are somehow less scientifically valid than adult cells, or that the research of the scientists using embryonic cells is somehow less effective. (Maybe they have a Mengele-like propensity for evil that makes them poor scientists). </p>
<p>I think you can judge for yourself if this is a misleading argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the grimreader</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/white-coat-protest-on-embryo-research-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-20757</link>
		<dc:creator>the grimreader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 10:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=676#comment-20757</guid>
		<description>Ben

Have I missed some of your articles about the HFE bill?  You&#039;re exactly the type of person one looks to for an assessment of just what is wrong with the objections put forth by the likes of Lord Alton.

Clearly you support the HFE bill, calling those of us who oppose it &#039;fruitcakes&#039;.  However, you haven&#039;t set forth your position (unless I&#039;ve missed it).  Can you explain to those of us who respect you as a writer and a scientist why you are so dismissive of objections to the HFE bill?

A specific point which I would be grateful for clarification on is Lord Alton&#039;s claim that embryonic stem cell research has led to no therapeutic applications, whereas adult stem cells have lead to 70 or so therapies.  While I&#039;m against the bill, I am also interested to know whether folks (on either side of the debate) are using misleading arguments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben</p>
<p>Have I missed some of your articles about the HFE bill?  You&#8217;re exactly the type of person one looks to for an assessment of just what is wrong with the objections put forth by the likes of Lord Alton.</p>
<p>Clearly you support the HFE bill, calling those of us who oppose it &#8216;fruitcakes&#8217;.  However, you haven&#8217;t set forth your position (unless I&#8217;ve missed it).  Can you explain to those of us who respect you as a writer and a scientist why you are so dismissive of objections to the HFE bill?</p>
<p>A specific point which I would be grateful for clarification on is Lord Alton&#8217;s claim that embryonic stem cell research has led to no therapeutic applications, whereas adult stem cells have lead to 70 or so therapies.  While I&#8217;m against the bill, I am also interested to know whether folks (on either side of the debate) are using misleading arguments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Carnegie</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/white-coat-protest-on-embryo-research-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-20753</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Carnegie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 23:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=676#comment-20753</guid>
		<description>If you come straight from the autopsy to intensive care without changing clothes - as we are told they used to do - well, that&#039;s the problem with white coats in hospital, I suppose.  I think mad scientists are still allowed them, though.  For roleplay costume, something fancier than bog-standard, chefs have some wicked gear in white.  Really.  Crazy with little buttons, big buttons...  The trick is to accessorise so that people don&#039;t think you -are- a chef.

That aside, I must remember to notice what Greg House and his gang are wearing in [House, M.D.]  By the UK-current season 4 they may have changed - the cast kind of has.  House himself wasn&#039;t a white-coat guy in the first place, but then he wasn&#039;t a see-any-patients or a work-in-clinic guy either.  Like Professor X and the X-Men, he stays home and sends the kids on their missions alone.  Patients regain consciousness at the end of the episode and go, &quot;Uh, who are -you?-&quot;  And if he doesn&#039;t need to look all doctory and impress the client, then he doesn&#039;t need a white coat.

And of course [Scrubs] season seven started here, where the clue is in the title.  Anyone know why the sound on E4 Plus One runs out of time with the picture?  Magic of digital.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you come straight from the autopsy to intensive care without changing clothes &#8211; as we are told they used to do &#8211; well, that&#8217;s the problem with white coats in hospital, I suppose.  I think mad scientists are still allowed them, though.  For roleplay costume, something fancier than bog-standard, chefs have some wicked gear in white.  Really.  Crazy with little buttons, big buttons&#8230;  The trick is to accessorise so that people don&#8217;t think you -are- a chef.</p>
<p>That aside, I must remember to notice what Greg House and his gang are wearing in [House, M.D.]  By the UK-current season 4 they may have changed &#8211; the cast kind of has.  House himself wasn&#8217;t a white-coat guy in the first place, but then he wasn&#8217;t a see-any-patients or a work-in-clinic guy either.  Like Professor X and the X-Men, he stays home and sends the kids on their missions alone.  Patients regain consciousness at the end of the episode and go, &#8220;Uh, who are -you?-&#8221;  And if he doesn&#8217;t need to look all doctory and impress the client, then he doesn&#8217;t need a white coat.</p>
<p>And of course [Scrubs] season seven started here, where the clue is in the title.  Anyone know why the sound on E4 Plus One runs out of time with the picture?  Magic of digital.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulhardy</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/white-coat-protest-on-embryo-research-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-20751</link>
		<dc:creator>paulhardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 17:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=676#comment-20751</guid>
		<description>&#039;Sleeves &amp; not being washed daily. “Bare below the elbows”
The DH has banned them…&#039;

Don&#039;t understand; banned what... elbows?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Sleeves &amp; not being washed daily. “Bare below the elbows”<br />
The DH has banned them…&#8217;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t understand; banned what&#8230; elbows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: germslayer</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/white-coat-protest-on-embryo-research-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-20750</link>
		<dc:creator>germslayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 12:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=676#comment-20750</guid>
		<description>Sleeves &amp; not being washed daily. &quot;Bare below the elbows&quot;
The DH has banned them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sleeves &amp; not being washed daily. &#8220;Bare below the elbows&#8221;<br />
The DH has banned them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maarten Van Hemelen</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/white-coat-protest-on-embryo-research-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-20747</link>
		<dc:creator>Maarten Van Hemelen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 19:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=676#comment-20747</guid>
		<description>What does infection control have to do with white coats? I thought ties were dangerous...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does infection control have to do with white coats? I thought ties were dangerous&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: germslayer</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/white-coat-protest-on-embryo-research-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-20745</link>
		<dc:creator>germslayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=676#comment-20745</guid>
		<description>Erm, hello, infection control nurses are not all nazis thank you for the insult!

But not to derail. I can&#039;t make it, but I hope there&#039;s a good turnout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erm, hello, infection control nurses are not all nazis thank you for the insult!</p>
<p>But not to derail. I can&#8217;t make it, but I hope there&#8217;s a good turnout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yoav</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/white-coat-protest-on-embryo-research-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-20744</link>
		<dc:creator>yoav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 07:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=676#comment-20744</guid>
		<description>Bring your white coat????

You&#039;ll be lucky! I haven&#039;t worn a white coat in years. No doctor does any more and the last few hardcore white coat wearers that persisted were wiped out by the infection control nazis.

Maybe a costume hire shop could help?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bring your white coat????</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll be lucky! I haven&#8217;t worn a white coat in years. No doctor does any more and the last few hardcore white coat wearers that persisted were wiped out by the infection control nazis.</p>
<p>Maybe a costume hire shop could help?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jut</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/white-coat-protest-on-embryo-research-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-20742</link>
		<dc:creator>Jut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 22:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=676#comment-20742</guid>
		<description>meh, going to be working unfortunatly, too far away to make it to london :(
I&#039;ll be there in spirit though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>meh, going to be working unfortunatly, too far away to make it to london <img src='http://www.badscience.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I&#8217;ll be there in spirit though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt from Nature Network</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/white-coat-protest-on-embryo-research-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-20739</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt from Nature Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=676#comment-20739</guid>
		<description>Hang on...don&#039;t you (individually) have to inform the police if you intend to protest outside parliament, or risk arrest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hang on&#8230;don&#8217;t you (individually) have to inform the police if you intend to protest outside parliament, or risk arrest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: used to be jdc</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/white-coat-protest-on-embryo-research-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-20738</link>
		<dc:creator>used to be jdc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 11:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=676#comment-20738</guid>
		<description>Is there anything useful (non-travelling) non-Londoners can do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there anything useful (non-travelling) non-Londoners can do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teek</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/white-coat-protest-on-embryo-research-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-20737</link>
		<dc:creator>Teek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 07:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=676#comment-20737</guid>
		<description>will try and attend if poss - will there be a chance to speak to Mr Harris...?

Ben - will you attend the debate and/or the drop-in meeting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>will try and attend if poss &#8211; will there be a chance to speak to Mr Harris&#8230;?</p>
<p>Ben &#8211; will you attend the debate and/or the drop-in meeting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sili</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/white-coat-protest-on-embryo-research-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-20736</link>
		<dc:creator>Sili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 01:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=676#comment-20736</guid>
		<description>Huzzah!

Are the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pro-Test&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pro-Test&lt;/a&gt; people joining, or is this just taking a page from their book? Not that there&#039;s anything wrong with that.

Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huzzah!</p>
<p>Are the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pro-Test" rel="nofollow">Pro-Test</a> people joining, or is this just taking a page from their book? Not that there&#8217;s anything wrong with that.</p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
