<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Kymatika K-test and&#8230; oh, look at that: LBC. Updated.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:24:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wayscj</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/comment-page-2/#comment-28994</link>
		<dc:creator>wayscj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/#comment-28994</guid>
		<description>ed hardy &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy clothing &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy clothing&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy clothing&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy shop &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy shop&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy shop&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
christian audigier &lt;a title=&quot;christian audigier&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;christian audigier&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy cheap &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy cheap&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy cheap&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy outlet &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy outlet&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy outlet&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy sale &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy clothes&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy sale&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy store &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy store&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy store&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy mens &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy mens&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk/mens.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy mens&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy womens &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy womens&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk/womens.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy womens&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy kids &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy kids&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk/kids.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy kids&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ed hardy kids</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ed hardy <a title="ed hardy" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy</strong></a><br />
ed hardy clothing <a title="ed hardy clothing" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy clothing</strong></a><br />
ed hardy shop <a title="ed hardy shop" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy shop</strong></a><br />
christian audigier <a title="christian audigier" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>christian audigier</strong></a><br />
ed hardy cheap <a title="ed hardy cheap" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy cheap</strong></a><br />
ed hardy outlet <a title="ed hardy outlet" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy outlet</strong></a><br />
ed hardy sale <a title="ed hardy clothes" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy sale</strong></a><br />
ed hardy store <a title="ed hardy store" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy store</strong></a><br />
ed hardy mens <a title="ed hardy mens" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk/mens.html" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy mens</strong></a><br />
ed hardy womens <a title="ed hardy womens" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk/womens.html" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy womens</strong></a><br />
ed hardy kids <a title="ed hardy kids" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk/kids.html" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy kids</strong></a> ed hardy kids</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Severs</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/comment-page-2/#comment-26351</link>
		<dc:creator>Severs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 07:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/#comment-26351</guid>
		<description>Well, &quot;Mary&quot; certainly needs help. Do we start with her understanding of electricity generation, the concept of polarity, or english spelling and grammar?

Sorry, that sounds too self-superior. after all, the closing comment from &quot;Mary&quot; is as follows: &quot;IF WE SEE ITS ONLY IN THE MIND!&quot;.

Ben, I&#039;m very concerned that you don&#039;t have the ability to understand how energy works unless you have access to diagrams. Say it isn&#039;t so?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, &#8220;Mary&#8221; certainly needs help. Do we start with her understanding of electricity generation, the concept of polarity, or english spelling and grammar?</p>
<p>Sorry, that sounds too self-superior. after all, the closing comment from &#8220;Mary&#8221; is as follows: &#8220;IF WE SEE ITS ONLY IN THE MIND!&#8221;.</p>
<p>Ben, I&#8217;m very concerned that you don&#8217;t have the ability to understand how energy works unless you have access to diagrams. Say it isn&#8217;t so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/comment-page-2/#comment-26195</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/#comment-26195</guid>
		<description>http://www.bsim.org.uk/healthcare_commission.htm
The healthcare commission investigated here and little was done GP`s and maybe someone from the HSE
they know evenless how a mobile phone works.
Let alone a devices the interferes potentually with T waves in the heart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bsim.org.uk/healthcare_commission.htm" rel="nofollow">www.bsim.org.uk/healthcare_commission.htm</a><br />
The healthcare commission investigated here and little was done GP`s and maybe someone from the HSE<br />
they know evenless how a mobile phone works.<br />
Let alone a devices the interferes potentually with T waves in the heart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/comment-page-2/#comment-26112</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 01:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/#comment-26112</guid>
		<description>Dear Ben,

I need help with this:

http://asianvictimsassociation.ning.com/profiles/blogs/fw-white-house-dod-officials?xgs=1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Ben,</p>
<p>I need help with this:</p>
<p><a href="http://asianvictimsassociation.ning.com/profiles/blogs/fw-white-house-dod-officials?xgs=1" rel="nofollow">asianvictimsassociation.ning.com/profiles/blogs/fw-white-house-dod-officials?xgs=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/comment-page-2/#comment-26061</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/#comment-26061</guid>
		<description>SO IF SOMEONE CAN HELP AND PERHAPS BEN WOULD HAVE A DISCUSSION WITH ME.

HE NEEDS AN ARTICLE ON HOW ENERGY REALLY WORKS WITH DIAGRAMS...???????

IT DOES NOT MATTER WHAT LAWS THERE ARE GOVERNMENT IGNORE LIKEWISE EXPERTS DO AS WELL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SO IF SOMEONE CAN HELP AND PERHAPS BEN WOULD HAVE A DISCUSSION WITH ME.</p>
<p>HE NEEDS AN ARTICLE ON HOW ENERGY REALLY WORKS WITH DIAGRAMS&#8230;???????</p>
<p>IT DOES NOT MATTER WHAT LAWS THERE ARE GOVERNMENT IGNORE LIKEWISE EXPERTS DO AS WELL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/comment-page-2/#comment-26060</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/#comment-26060</guid>
		<description>The top of the list; how does a computer mobile phone or K-test and other devices based on new technology work: Its not spelt out how the components work and interact. The government used to say it did not know how mobile phones worked and what effect they have on us. Its gone on to use the HSE and the NRPB to allow manufactures to encourage us to buy the next toy. Call it another name and it becomes safe.. Or all in the mind if we find we might get sick on exposure. Its also all in the mind if we get better.

I contacted all government departments and have been ignored.

The MoD can close technology down:If it does not comply to BSI.(However the government is now challenging the MoD) BSI standards are being ignored poor measurement and understand.
Governments letting industry do as it likes.
Under the guise of security on one hand and the public wants; or thinks it wants.
Trading Standard will not cause they have not the ability to measure it nor can they produce any experts. (The law has like to do with science and likewise the government, turning a blind eye with regard to real safety)

The basic components in technology are the basis of 
RADAR and nuclear energy. 
Ion Drive systems are part of how it can effect the body`s cells. In both a helpful as well as a harmful way. 

Keely.net.com tried to bury this info that practitioners who used these biofeedback devices end up having strokes or heart attacks. Because long term use basically over cooks them.
Its very debatable if the patient is helped long term either.

As far as I can observe is the whole of computer technology perimintaly changes the natural polarity. On initial exposure the reverse polarity 
helps clean the body like de-polarisation. However even if we`ve not been using K-test our cells have been locked in the wrong polarity.

Naturally the body reverses it being North/ South polarity: 

The basic component that makes computers and not only that non-lethal weapons has many names.
&quot;Reverse Polarity Motor&quot; best describes it.
They are set to produce Scalar Waves where the power is not confined to the immediate place.
Dr Henry Lai said that Tasar Guns interfere with the T-wave in the heart resulting in heart attacks.
What are Tasars just another version of  a K-Test.
If we start thinking in terms of that`s what technology is and that`s what we are playing with:
If we think our mobile phone as a Tasar Gun and yes our computer is a Tasar Gun. 

Something might just get done. 
I am sure if some just might still reading this they might do a search on Dr Lai and Tasars.

There was a British consultant used to combat Dr Lai`s concerns: Who said that &quot;But Tasars are only Low Level Radiation&quot;

Low level radiation is confused with low powered:
Like High Level Radiation must equate to high power. The MoD, industry and past governments have allowed science to be confusing.

Low Level Radiation referrers to not only low frequency but nuclear radiation. It nothing to do with low power. The confusion about low power has come in part from misreading the meter in the wrong phase or polarity. Modern technology works on REVERSE POLARITY. Hence power should be read from the South not the North....

The power output of your mobile phone might be 4 Herts if read on the North Scale. Reversing the phase or polarity to the South Changes the output to non-hertz and that energy at a particle level moves very fast; not slow as some experts think low frequency works on.
If the polarity was set to a North polarity the speed of particles might be slower.

However computer technology works on a multi phase system and &quot;Standing Wave&quot; The Scalar/non-linear 
allows the energy to not decay over any distance and The MoD found this as reported in the times online.

We have reached a very dangerous situation:
The legislations there... Except the government and industry are not going to act or tell us what their doing.

BBC Horizon GOD and the Brain with Michael Persinger: Applying currents to peoples brains.
The Secret KGB Paranormal Files Narr by Roger Moore DVD 1999

Some of this appeared in Horizon in 1995

The Secret KGB Paranormal Files if your can find the original ITV version has a few extra bits in it. In the 1930`s the Navy Russian used microwaves to talk to voleenters at the bottom of the sea.

Later in the 1960`s the US government was concerned about the Russians using microwaves to listen into their conversation in the Embassy in Moscow.

They used various experts to find how much radiation the Embassy staff were exposed too.
Included one British expert Alf Riggs (Whose a dowser and electrical engineer)

He did not workout that in fact the Russians were generating their microwaves in the reverse polarity
what might appeared to be microwave; was low frequency.... (But not low frequency) The output was set lower on the oscilloscope if misread from the North polarity. So the UK and USA experts only thought it was low level radiation.

Despite this... It seems no one could work out the effects on staff through mathematics. These staff were getting head cancers.

I would of thought a Hospital Radiation expert might of been brought in...?
Instead the words we don`t know or, better still keep echoing around its all in the mind a placebo effect. Sue Blackmoore to name a few.

That`s burnt my skin and still is; never mind madam
we will not help only laugh at you as we can`t see or feel it.. Look at the whole street no one else knows and that`s the way we like it.

In recent years we`ve had several cases related to hospital X-ray departments where patients have been over exposed to radiation treatments for cancer. Its obvious there is something wrong with the understanding of what that technology is and how to calculate and measure.

I`ve not found an adequate explanation as to what maths is supposed to be applied to new technology 
Its much more powerful than loglinear...
As scalar waves are non-linear they are thought to be 4X`s the power of linear.(BIG Questions)
But if they don`t decay over distance that answer has to be a load of rubbish.

The Earth only occasionally produces scalar waves having devices continually producing Scalar waves or Standing Wave. 

Noise Consultants and a electronics expert have not a clue and they get very nasty.

They hardly know how to wire a plug.
They know nothing about Star Trek and quantum physics. The quantum Physics people say its theoretical science and not real.

As its not real we shall forget it!
The Nuclear industry has kept its secrets how that energy is made.. Its all made out of computer/Tesla
systems with a very cheeky little number are all part of how wind power works really.
fURTHER READING:
Zeropoint Energy by Nick Cook
The Field By Lynn Mctaggart 

I`ve personaly contact all UK government department
these jobs worth`s don`t think it real.
OR IT DOES NOT MEAN THEM MORE LIKE THE CASE.
Our eye`s have been distracted on many falsehoods all to easily.

In which we don`t wish to know technology is already manipulating us from top to bottom.
Some people think they can heal with these devices.

OUR POWER SYSTEMS ARE PRODUCING DIRTY ELECTRICITY
AND ARE OVER POWERED.
THE ELECTRICITY COMPANIES HAVE NO EQUIPMENT TO MEASURE IT. BESIDES THE GOVERNMENTS TOLD THEM NEW TECHNOLOGY (WHAT SAFETY )

SOME PEOPLE KNOW BUT NOT ENOUGH.
POLITICAL IGORANCE IS GIVEING A RED LIGHT TO INDUSTRY TO USE NON-LEATHAL WEAPONS ON US AND DRESS IT UP AS NEW AND BRIGHT!

IF WE SEE ITS ONLY IN THE MIND!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The top of the list; how does a computer mobile phone or K-test and other devices based on new technology work: Its not spelt out how the components work and interact. The government used to say it did not know how mobile phones worked and what effect they have on us. Its gone on to use the HSE and the NRPB to allow manufactures to encourage us to buy the next toy. Call it another name and it becomes safe.. Or all in the mind if we find we might get sick on exposure. Its also all in the mind if we get better.</p>
<p>I contacted all government departments and have been ignored.</p>
<p>The MoD can close technology down:If it does not comply to BSI.(However the government is now challenging the MoD) BSI standards are being ignored poor measurement and understand.<br />
Governments letting industry do as it likes.<br />
Under the guise of security on one hand and the public wants; or thinks it wants.<br />
Trading Standard will not cause they have not the ability to measure it nor can they produce any experts. (The law has like to do with science and likewise the government, turning a blind eye with regard to real safety)</p>
<p>The basic components in technology are the basis of<br />
RADAR and nuclear energy.<br />
Ion Drive systems are part of how it can effect the body`s cells. In both a helpful as well as a harmful way. </p>
<p><a href="http://Keely.net.com" class="autohyperlink" title="http://Keely.net.com" target="_blank">Keely.net.com</a> tried to bury this info that practitioners who used these biofeedback devices end up having strokes or heart attacks. Because long term use basically over cooks them.<br />
Its very debatable if the patient is helped long term either.</p>
<p>As far as I can observe is the whole of computer technology perimintaly changes the natural polarity. On initial exposure the reverse polarity<br />
helps clean the body like de-polarisation. However even if we`ve not been using K-test our cells have been locked in the wrong polarity.</p>
<p>Naturally the body reverses it being North/ South polarity: </p>
<p>The basic component that makes computers and not only that non-lethal weapons has many names.<br />
&#8220;Reverse Polarity Motor&#8221; best describes it.<br />
They are set to produce Scalar Waves where the power is not confined to the immediate place.<br />
Dr Henry Lai said that Tasar Guns interfere with the T-wave in the heart resulting in heart attacks.<br />
What are Tasars just another version of  a K-Test.<br />
If we start thinking in terms of that`s what technology is and that`s what we are playing with:<br />
If we think our mobile phone as a Tasar Gun and yes our computer is a Tasar Gun. </p>
<p>Something might just get done.<br />
I am sure if some just might still reading this they might do a search on Dr Lai and Tasars.</p>
<p>There was a British consultant used to combat Dr Lai`s concerns: Who said that &#8220;But Tasars are only Low Level Radiation&#8221;</p>
<p>Low level radiation is confused with low powered:<br />
Like High Level Radiation must equate to high power. The MoD, industry and past governments have allowed science to be confusing.</p>
<p>Low Level Radiation referrers to not only low frequency but nuclear radiation. It nothing to do with low power. The confusion about low power has come in part from misreading the meter in the wrong phase or polarity. Modern technology works on REVERSE POLARITY. Hence power should be read from the South not the North&#8230;.</p>
<p>The power output of your mobile phone might be 4 Herts if read on the North Scale. Reversing the phase or polarity to the South Changes the output to non-hertz and that energy at a particle level moves very fast; not slow as some experts think low frequency works on.<br />
If the polarity was set to a North polarity the speed of particles might be slower.</p>
<p>However computer technology works on a multi phase system and &#8220;Standing Wave&#8221; The Scalar/non-linear<br />
allows the energy to not decay over any distance and The MoD found this as reported in the times online.</p>
<p>We have reached a very dangerous situation:<br />
The legislations there&#8230; Except the government and industry are not going to act or tell us what their doing.</p>
<p>BBC Horizon GOD and the Brain with Michael Persinger: Applying currents to peoples brains.<br />
The Secret KGB Paranormal Files Narr by Roger Moore DVD 1999</p>
<p>Some of this appeared in Horizon in 1995</p>
<p>The Secret KGB Paranormal Files if your can find the original ITV version has a few extra bits in it. In the 1930`s the Navy Russian used microwaves to talk to voleenters at the bottom of the sea.</p>
<p>Later in the 1960`s the US government was concerned about the Russians using microwaves to listen into their conversation in the Embassy in Moscow.</p>
<p>They used various experts to find how much radiation the Embassy staff were exposed too.<br />
Included one British expert Alf Riggs (Whose a dowser and electrical engineer)</p>
<p>He did not workout that in fact the Russians were generating their microwaves in the reverse polarity<br />
what might appeared to be microwave; was low frequency&#8230;. (But not low frequency) The output was set lower on the oscilloscope if misread from the North polarity. So the UK and USA experts only thought it was low level radiation.</p>
<p>Despite this&#8230; It seems no one could work out the effects on staff through mathematics. These staff were getting head cancers.</p>
<p>I would of thought a Hospital Radiation expert might of been brought in&#8230;?<br />
Instead the words we don`t know or, better still keep echoing around its all in the mind a placebo effect. Sue Blackmoore to name a few.</p>
<p>That`s burnt my skin and still is; never mind madam<br />
we will not help only laugh at you as we can`t see or feel it.. Look at the whole street no one else knows and that`s the way we like it.</p>
<p>In recent years we`ve had several cases related to hospital X-ray departments where patients have been over exposed to radiation treatments for cancer. Its obvious there is something wrong with the understanding of what that technology is and how to calculate and measure.</p>
<p>I`ve not found an adequate explanation as to what maths is supposed to be applied to new technology<br />
Its much more powerful than loglinear&#8230;<br />
As scalar waves are non-linear they are thought to be 4X`s the power of linear.(BIG Questions)<br />
But if they don`t decay over distance that answer has to be a load of rubbish.</p>
<p>The Earth only occasionally produces scalar waves having devices continually producing Scalar waves or Standing Wave. </p>
<p>Noise Consultants and a electronics expert have not a clue and they get very nasty.</p>
<p>They hardly know how to wire a plug.<br />
They know nothing about Star Trek and quantum physics. The quantum Physics people say its theoretical science and not real.</p>
<p>As its not real we shall forget it!<br />
The Nuclear industry has kept its secrets how that energy is made.. Its all made out of computer/Tesla<br />
systems with a very cheeky little number are all part of how wind power works really.<br />
fURTHER READING:<br />
Zeropoint Energy by Nick Cook<br />
The Field By Lynn Mctaggart </p>
<p>I`ve personaly contact all UK government department<br />
these jobs worth`s don`t think it real.<br />
OR IT DOES NOT MEAN THEM MORE LIKE THE CASE.<br />
Our eye`s have been distracted on many falsehoods all to easily.</p>
<p>In which we don`t wish to know technology is already manipulating us from top to bottom.<br />
Some people think they can heal with these devices.</p>
<p>OUR POWER SYSTEMS ARE PRODUCING DIRTY ELECTRICITY<br />
AND ARE OVER POWERED.<br />
THE ELECTRICITY COMPANIES HAVE NO EQUIPMENT TO MEASURE IT. BESIDES THE GOVERNMENTS TOLD THEM NEW TECHNOLOGY (WHAT SAFETY )</p>
<p>SOME PEOPLE KNOW BUT NOT ENOUGH.<br />
POLITICAL IGORANCE IS GIVEING A RED LIGHT TO INDUSTRY TO USE NON-LEATHAL WEAPONS ON US AND DRESS IT UP AS NEW AND BRIGHT!</p>
<p>IF WE SEE ITS ONLY IN THE MIND!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bf</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/comment-page-2/#comment-25443</link>
		<dc:creator>bf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/#comment-25443</guid>
		<description>Why not publish Jonathan Richards&#039; unpleasant emails? Just because he says they&#039;re not for publication, doesn&#039;t mean you have to agree. What&#039;s he going to do - sue you for breach of copyright on his emails?!

If he doesn&#039;t want you to publish them, perhaps he shouldn&#039;t send you them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not publish Jonathan Richards&#8217; unpleasant emails? Just because he says they&#8217;re not for publication, doesn&#8217;t mean you have to agree. What&#8217;s he going to do &#8211; sue you for breach of copyright on his emails?!</p>
<p>If he doesn&#8217;t want you to publish them, perhaps he shouldn&#8217;t send you them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krog</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/comment-page-2/#comment-25272</link>
		<dc:creator>krog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/#comment-25272</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve only just got round to listening to the LBC clip. Has anyone else realised that the LBC presenter Bill Buckley was once a presenter on the famous BBC consumer affairs programme (and odd-shaped vegetable showcase) That&#039;s Life? I can&#039;t help but think that this K-test would have been prime fodder for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve only just got round to listening to the LBC clip. Has anyone else realised that the LBC presenter Bill Buckley was once a presenter on the famous BBC consumer affairs programme (and odd-shaped vegetable showcase) That&#8217;s Life? I can&#8217;t help but think that this K-test would have been prime fodder for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt of Clinical Research Land</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/comment-page-2/#comment-25033</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt of Clinical Research Land</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/#comment-25033</guid>
		<description>Step right up, step right up! This reeks of snake oil and phrenology. I&#039;m mildly surprised that they didn&#039;t claim machine doesn&#039;t test for disturbances in the ether. Once again, nonsense talk of &quot;toxins&quot;. Let&#039;s see this compared to ELISA or RAST. These people are claiming that it can detect &quot;imbalances&quot; or other health problems. Sounds like a medical device to me. As such, it should be regulated under Directive 93/42/EEC. My UK associates - has the MHRA approved this as such? I highly doubt the FDA here in the states would ever this device to be marketed as such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Step right up, step right up! This reeks of snake oil and phrenology. I&#8217;m mildly surprised that they didn&#8217;t claim machine doesn&#8217;t test for disturbances in the ether. Once again, nonsense talk of &#8220;toxins&#8221;. Let&#8217;s see this compared to ELISA or RAST. These people are claiming that it can detect &#8220;imbalances&#8221; or other health problems. Sounds like a medical device to me. As such, it should be regulated under Directive 93/42/EEC. My UK associates &#8211; has the MHRA approved this as such? I highly doubt the FDA here in the states would ever this device to be marketed as such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cumbrian</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/comment-page-2/#comment-24985</link>
		<dc:creator>cumbrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 21:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/#comment-24985</guid>
		<description>Speaking as one myself, I am horrified that pharmacists would buy into this rubbish.  Watchdog should have sent along a coeliac patient to try it out - that would have sorted them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking as one myself, I am horrified that pharmacists would buy into this rubbish.  Watchdog should have sent along a coeliac patient to try it out &#8211; that would have sorted them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave The Drummer</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/comment-page-2/#comment-24949</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave The Drummer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/#comment-24949</guid>
		<description>Anyone know why the podcast won&#039;t download ?
Or where I can get a copy of the audio ?
Cheers. DtD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone know why the podcast won&#8217;t download ?<br />
Or where I can get a copy of the audio ?<br />
Cheers. DtD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikewhit</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/comment-page-2/#comment-24918</link>
		<dc:creator>mikewhit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/#comment-24918</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t a better test have been to take people with known diagnosed a) intolerance(s) and perhaps b) allergies to see if it spotted them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t a better test have been to take people with known diagnosed a) intolerance(s) and perhaps b) allergies to see if it spotted them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikewhit</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/comment-page-2/#comment-24916</link>
		<dc:creator>mikewhit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/#comment-24916</guid>
		<description>Ben, Sorry to hear Julia Bradbury&#039;s in the doo-doo ... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/sussex/7901764.stm .

Must be your voodoo jinx effect !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben, Sorry to hear Julia Bradbury&#8217;s in the doo-doo &#8230; <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/sussex/7901764.stm" rel="nofollow">news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/sussex/7901764.stm</a> .</p>
<p>Must be your voodoo jinx effect !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/comment-page-2/#comment-24915</link>
		<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/#comment-24915</guid>
		<description>Last comment should have read &quot;experiencing problems&quot;.  I tried to make a link but it didn&#039;t work out.  http://www.kymatika.com/kymatika-k-test</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last comment should have read &#8220;experiencing problems&#8221;.  I tried to make a link but it didn&#8217;t work out.  <a href="http://www.kymatika.com/kymatika-k-test" rel="nofollow">www.kymatika.com/kymatika-k-test</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/comment-page-2/#comment-24914</link>
		<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/#comment-24914</guid>
		<description>1. &quot;Kymatika provided us with evidence and testimonials from an extensive trial carried out using over 500 people&quot; - is it reasonable to call a trial of this size (~500) &quot;extensive&quot;?

2.  Kymatika website is currently experience.  The response is &quot;Service Unavailable&quot;.  Not sure if this is a web server error or a press release though :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. &#8220;Kymatika provided us with evidence and testimonials from an extensive trial carried out using over 500 people&#8221; &#8211; is it reasonable to call a trial of this size (~500) &#8220;extensive&#8221;?</p>
<p>2.  Kymatika website is currently experience.  The response is &#8220;Service Unavailable&#8221;.  Not sure if this is a web server error or a press release though <img src='http://www.badscience.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Aust</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/comment-page-2/#comment-24897</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Aust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/#comment-24897</guid>
		<description>Re. post 66, there is a vast range of &quot;Bio-electro-Woo&quot; quack devices out there - K-test is just the latest example. You can read some of the history &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/electro.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.

For easily the most flamboyant of the modern electro-woo con-men, see Ben&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.badscience.net/2008/08/bill-nelson-wins-the-internet/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;column from last Summer&lt;/a&gt; on Bill Nelson aka Desiree Dubounet (sic), who you can also catch in the flesh on Canadian TV &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.ca/marketplace/2009/miracle_makers_or_money_takers/main.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; - has to be seen to be believed, BTW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re. post 66, there is a vast range of &#8220;Bio-electro-Woo&#8221; quack devices out there &#8211; K-test is just the latest example. You can read some of the history <a href="http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/electro.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
<p>For easily the most flamboyant of the modern electro-woo con-men, see Ben&#8217;s <a href="http://www.badscience.net/2008/08/bill-nelson-wins-the-internet/" rel="nofollow">column from last Summer</a> on Bill Nelson aka Desiree Dubounet (sic), who you can also catch in the flesh on Canadian TV <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/marketplace/2009/miracle_makers_or_money_takers/main.html" rel="nofollow">here</a> &#8211; has to be seen to be believed, BTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cebolla</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/comment-page-2/#comment-24895</link>
		<dc:creator>cebolla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/#comment-24895</guid>
		<description>Ben, Bradbury had you at &#039;expert&#039;. You were playing with your hair like a girl.
She is hot though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben, Bradbury had you at &#8216;expert&#8217;. You were playing with your hair like a girl.<br />
She is hot though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/comment-page-2/#comment-24887</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/#comment-24887</guid>
		<description>On the upside these quacks are managing to keep the software enginers somewhere they can do very little harm.

You wouldn&#039;t want these guys working on aviation or nuclear power applications would you.

Best if they stick to quackery and parting fools from their money (apologies to the contributors who shelled out for this drivel but the very fact you post here means YOU SHOULD KNOW BETTER).

Maybe the product is crap and gives wildly disparate results  because food intolerance is a moveable feast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the upside these quacks are managing to keep the software enginers somewhere they can do very little harm.</p>
<p>You wouldn&#8217;t want these guys working on aviation or nuclear power applications would you.</p>
<p>Best if they stick to quackery and parting fools from their money (apologies to the contributors who shelled out for this drivel but the very fact you post here means YOU SHOULD KNOW BETTER).</p>
<p>Maybe the product is crap and gives wildly disparate results  because food intolerance is a moveable feast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: droid</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/comment-page-2/#comment-24884</link>
		<dc:creator>droid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/#comment-24884</guid>
		<description>I wrote to Superdrug Customer Relations about their offering of the K-Test and received the following in reply:

------------------------------
Dear Ian,

Thank you for your patience.

We have received correspondence from the Buyer concerned.

Every product or service that Superdrug offers its customers goes through a rigorous quality control process before the decision is taken to stock it.

Kymatika provided us with evidence and testimonials from an extensive trial carried out using over 500 people.  We have also been provided with subsequent studies as they&#039;ve been completed.

750 people have been tested over the last year and they have received only 2 complaints about the service.

I hope this information helps.

Kind Regards,

Superdrug Customer Relations

------------------------------

Amazing how I guessed the gist of the reply before it even landed in my Inbox....

Ian

(my first post on this excellent site)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote to Superdrug Customer Relations about their offering of the K-Test and received the following in reply:</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Dear Ian,</p>
<p>Thank you for your patience.</p>
<p>We have received correspondence from the Buyer concerned.</p>
<p>Every product or service that Superdrug offers its customers goes through a rigorous quality control process before the decision is taken to stock it.</p>
<p>Kymatika provided us with evidence and testimonials from an extensive trial carried out using over 500 people.  We have also been provided with subsequent studies as they&#8217;ve been completed.</p>
<p>750 people have been tested over the last year and they have received only 2 complaints about the service.</p>
<p>I hope this information helps.</p>
<p>Kind Regards,</p>
<p>Superdrug Customer Relations</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Amazing how I guessed the gist of the reply before it even landed in my Inbox&#8230;.</p>
<p>Ian</p>
<p>(my first post on this excellent site)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gazza</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/comment-page-2/#comment-24880</link>
		<dc:creator>gazza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-kymatika-k-test-and-lbc/#comment-24880</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think this piece of woo is the same as the &#039;K test&#039; nonsense highlighted by Ben - but it looks to be a kissing cousin at the very least;

http://www.allergytest.co.uk/whatisallergy.aspx

Obviously, woo allergy tests are going to be the big thing this year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think this piece of woo is the same as the &#8216;K test&#8217; nonsense highlighted by Ben &#8211; but it looks to be a kissing cousin at the very least;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.allergytest.co.uk/whatisallergy.aspx" rel="nofollow">www.allergytest.co.uk/whatisallergy.aspx</a></p>
<p>Obviously, woo allergy tests are going to be the big thing this year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

