<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PR-reviewed data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:57:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fv35HELEN</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/comment-page-1/#comment-30989</link>
		<dc:creator>fv35HELEN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/#comment-30989</guid>
		<description>People do opine that the argumentative essay creating seems to be the really time taking issue. However, we rely on the &lt;a href=&quot;//quality-papers.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;essays online&lt;/a&gt; service support every time when it&#039;s demanded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People do opine that the argumentative essay creating seems to be the really time taking issue. However, we rely on the <a href="//quality-papers.com" rel="nofollow">essays online</a> service support every time when it&#8217;s demanded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wayscj</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/comment-page-1/#comment-29021</link>
		<dc:creator>wayscj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/#comment-29021</guid>
		<description>ed hardy &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy clothing &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy clothing&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy clothing&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy shop &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy shop&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy shop&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
christian audigier &lt;a title=&quot;christian audigier&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;christian audigier&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy cheap &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy cheap&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy cheap&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy outlet &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy outlet&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy outlet&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy sale &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy clothes&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy sale&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy store &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy store&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy store&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy mens &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy mens&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk/mens.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy mens&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy womens &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy womens&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk/womens.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy womens&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
ed hardy kids &lt;a title=&quot;ed hardy kids&quot; href=&quot;http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk/kids.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ed hardy kids&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ed hardy kids</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ed hardy <a title="ed hardy" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy</strong></a><br />
ed hardy clothing <a title="ed hardy clothing" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy clothing</strong></a><br />
ed hardy shop <a title="ed hardy shop" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy shop</strong></a><br />
christian audigier <a title="christian audigier" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>christian audigier</strong></a><br />
ed hardy cheap <a title="ed hardy cheap" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy cheap</strong></a><br />
ed hardy outlet <a title="ed hardy outlet" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy outlet</strong></a><br />
ed hardy sale <a title="ed hardy clothes" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy sale</strong></a><br />
ed hardy store <a title="ed hardy store" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy store</strong></a><br />
ed hardy mens <a title="ed hardy mens" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk/mens.html" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy mens</strong></a><br />
ed hardy womens <a title="ed hardy womens" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk/womens.html" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy womens</strong></a><br />
ed hardy kids <a title="ed hardy kids" href="http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk/kids.html" rel="nofollow"><strong>ed hardy kids</strong></a> ed hardy kids</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Griffiths</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/comment-page-1/#comment-27623</link>
		<dc:creator>Griffiths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/#comment-27623</guid>
		<description>Is the answer to fight back? Science institutions, the RI, Universities and others, should start feeding the papers equally easy to print stories, but ones which are raising awareness of genuinely important developments and research. What actually happens is that potentially interesting work is buried, either in journals you need to pay to view, or in impenetrable jargon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the answer to fight back? Science institutions, the RI, Universities and others, should start feeding the papers equally easy to print stories, but ones which are raising awareness of genuinely important developments and research. What actually happens is that potentially interesting work is buried, either in journals you need to pay to view, or in impenetrable jargon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: platothefish</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/comment-page-1/#comment-27614</link>
		<dc:creator>platothefish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/#comment-27614</guid>
		<description>Need to write a story exposing something there is no real evidence for? Easy create your own poll, get the office to complete it and just give the percentages as concrete results. Sky news does it all the time. I think it is a recognised research technique isn&#039;t it? I am sure I remember something like this being taught during my Ph.D. I think it was  sandwiched between factor analysis techniques and advance regression analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Need to write a story exposing something there is no real evidence for? Easy create your own poll, get the office to complete it and just give the percentages as concrete results. Sky news does it all the time. I think it is a recognised research technique isn&#8217;t it? I am sure I remember something like this being taught during my Ph.D. I think it was  sandwiched between factor analysis techniques and advance regression analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Svetlana Pertsovich</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/comment-page-1/#comment-27600</link>
		<dc:creator>Svetlana Pertsovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/#comment-27600</guid>
		<description>Ben, 
I tried to send this letter by e-mail to you. But there is overload in box :( So I write here.

David Colquhoun wants to undergo an opearation. Look at here:
http://www.dcscience.net/?p=2073
Do you see it?  &quot;And now it looks as though I’ll be getting a partial or total nephrectomy too.&quot;
And here:
http://www.dcscience.net/?p=1980
Do you see David&#039;s comment #6?

It is not joke and not idle blabbing. He wants to do it really.

I talked with him. He thinks that he has a cancer. It is complete nonsense! It is common overdiagnosis! The operation is not useless, moreover - harmfull and dangerous!
Stop him, please. You are a doctor and his friend! Please!
Or else this idiot will kill himself by his silly behaviour!
He will listen to you.

PLEASE! Save him!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben,<br />
I tried to send this letter by e-mail to you. But there is overload in box <img src='http://www.badscience.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  So I write here.</p>
<p>David Colquhoun wants to undergo an opearation. Look at here:<br />
<a href="http://www.dcscience.net/?p=2073" rel="nofollow">http://www.dcscience.net/?p=2073</a><br />
Do you see it?  &#8220;And now it looks as though I’ll be getting a partial or total nephrectomy too.&#8221;<br />
And here:<br />
<a href="http://www.dcscience.net/?p=1980" rel="nofollow">http://www.dcscience.net/?p=1980</a><br />
Do you see David&#8217;s comment #6?</p>
<p>It is not joke and not idle blabbing. He wants to do it really.</p>
<p>I talked with him. He thinks that he has a cancer. It is complete nonsense! It is common overdiagnosis! The operation is not useless, moreover &#8211; harmfull and dangerous!<br />
Stop him, please. You are a doctor and his friend! Please!<br />
Or else this idiot will kill himself by his silly behaviour!<br />
He will listen to you.</p>
<p>PLEASE! Save him!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foofdawg</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/comment-page-1/#comment-27595</link>
		<dc:creator>foofdawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/#comment-27595</guid>
		<description>&quot;If you don&#039;t read the newspaper, you are uninformed; if you do read the newspaper, you are misinformed&quot; - Mark Twain

Might not be an exact quote, as I&#039;m getting it from my memory, but I&#039;ve always liked it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you don&#8217;t read the newspaper, you are uninformed; if you do read the newspaper, you are misinformed&#8221; &#8211; Mark Twain</p>
<p>Might not be an exact quote, as I&#8217;m getting it from my memory, but I&#8217;ve always liked it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Synchronium</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/comment-page-1/#comment-27594</link>
		<dc:creator>Synchronium</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/#comment-27594</guid>
		<description>Fanny magnet, lol.

You&#039;d think the Guardian editor would run this kind of shit past you first, if only out of fear that you&#039;ll flag it up. Seems hypocritical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fanny magnet, lol.</p>
<p>You&#8217;d think the Guardian editor would run this kind of shit past you first, if only out of fear that you&#8217;ll flag it up. Seems hypocritical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lafayette</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/comment-page-1/#comment-27591</link>
		<dc:creator>Lafayette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/#comment-27591</guid>
		<description>I saw some research on the fanny magnets a while back. I believe they recruited a load of menopausal women to wear them and then asked them if their symptoms persisted. The timeframe involved, and the response measured, seemed to suggest... well, I&#039;m sure you can work the rest out...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw some research on the fanny magnets a while back. I believe they recruited a load of menopausal women to wear them and then asked them if their symptoms persisted. The timeframe involved, and the response measured, seemed to suggest&#8230; well, I&#8217;m sure you can work the rest out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: austinresearch</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/comment-page-1/#comment-27590</link>
		<dc:creator>austinresearch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/#comment-27590</guid>
		<description>I have recently read publicity about the Guardian Group struggling and seen campaigns asking readers to make sure they buy regular copies of the Guardian and Observer to ensure these great publications don&#039;t go to the wall. Having purchased Sunday&#039;s Observer imagine my glee when I was perusing through the magazine this morning (special gardening edition) and stumbled on pieces about the Dolly Rockers&#039; and Pixie Lott&#039;s gardens. Utter drivel, written only with the hope of publicising their new releases. Observer reading gardeners seem to be a strange audience for the Dolly Rockers to target though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have recently read publicity about the Guardian Group struggling and seen campaigns asking readers to make sure they buy regular copies of the Guardian and Observer to ensure these great publications don&#8217;t go to the wall. Having purchased Sunday&#8217;s Observer imagine my glee when I was perusing through the magazine this morning (special gardening edition) and stumbled on pieces about the Dolly Rockers&#8217; and Pixie Lott&#8217;s gardens. Utter drivel, written only with the hope of publicising their new releases. Observer reading gardeners seem to be a strange audience for the Dolly Rockers to target though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baldingdad</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/comment-page-1/#comment-27584</link>
		<dc:creator>baldingdad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/#comment-27584</guid>
		<description>#1 - Paul Wilson, Alision Booth and pals undertook a near-as-damn-it systematic review of trastuzumab coverage which was published in the JRSM:

http://jrsm.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/abstract/101/3/125</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1 &#8211; Paul Wilson, Alision Booth and pals undertook a near-as-damn-it systematic review of trastuzumab coverage which was published in the JRSM:</p>
<p><a href="http://jrsm.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/abstract/101/3/125" rel="nofollow">http://jrsm.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/abstract/101/3/125</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theonlyrick</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/comment-page-1/#comment-27583</link>
		<dc:creator>theonlyrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/#comment-27583</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t to do with PR firms, but it&#039;s a pretty fantastic example of Bad Science:

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/2592758/Bolt-outruns-buses-and-the-tube.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t to do with PR firms, but it&#8217;s a pretty fantastic example of Bad Science:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/2592758/Bolt-outruns-buses-and-the-tube.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/2592758/Bolt-outruns-buses-and-the-tube.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikewhit</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/comment-page-1/#comment-27579</link>
		<dc:creator>mikewhit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/#comment-27579</guid>
		<description>#11: prescott - link spammer ! please block ... in fact, how about adding a script that bounces any posting containing the dreaded Finn Drux link !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#11: prescott &#8211; link spammer ! please block &#8230; in fact, how about adding a script that bounces any posting containing the dreaded Finn Drux link !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sair-fecht</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/comment-page-1/#comment-27577</link>
		<dc:creator>sair-fecht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/#comment-27577</guid>
		<description>On comment#1 - Now, maybe there is an idea of a job for some of those &#039;Media Studies&#039; graduates who are currently seeking useful employment...? (though I wonder if their analytical skills would be up for it!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On comment#1 &#8211; Now, maybe there is an idea of a job for some of those &#8216;Media Studies&#8217; graduates who are currently seeking useful employment&#8230;? (though I wonder if their analytical skills would be up for it!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prescott</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/comment-page-1/#comment-27576</link>
		<dc:creator>prescott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/#comment-27576</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.findrxonline.com/articulos-medica/parkinson.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Parkinson´s&lt;/a&gt; disease is caused by deterioration or death of certain neurons in a brain area known as substance nigra. These neurons produce dopamine, a neurotransmitter responsible for transmitting the signals between the substance nigra and the corpus striatum, upon a good muscle activity. 
The decrease in dopamine production in patients causes an inability to direct or control their movements as normal, due to lack of nerve cells in the striatum. Studies that findrxonline has shown that Parkinson&#039;s patients have a loss of 80% or more of dopamine-producing cells in the substance nigra. The cause of this cell death or damage is unknown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.findrxonline.com/articulos-medica/parkinson.html" rel="nofollow">Parkinson´s</a> disease is caused by deterioration or death of certain neurons in a brain area known as substance nigra. These neurons produce dopamine, a neurotransmitter responsible for transmitting the signals between the substance nigra and the corpus striatum, upon a good muscle activity.<br />
The decrease in dopamine production in patients causes an inability to direct or control their movements as normal, due to lack of nerve cells in the striatum. Studies that findrxonline has shown that Parkinson&#8217;s patients have a loss of 80% or more of dopamine-producing cells in the substance nigra. The cause of this cell death or damage is unknown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoralBloom</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/comment-page-1/#comment-27564</link>
		<dc:creator>CoralBloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 14:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/#comment-27564</guid>
		<description>I stopped buying newspapers years ago.  Why?  If the make such a mess of science reporting, then what about the rest (where I have much less background)?  
The press have made their own, fatal decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stopped buying newspapers years ago.  Why?  If the make such a mess of science reporting, then what about the rest (where I have much less background)?<br />
The press have made their own, fatal decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apatheticblues</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/comment-page-1/#comment-27563</link>
		<dc:creator>apatheticblues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 14:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/#comment-27563</guid>
		<description>I wish newspapers would realise that one of the reasons their advertising revenue is plummeting is because they are printing advertisements posing as news stories, simply because it&#039;s an easy, cheap way to fill their pages. Why would an advertiser pay for glossy adverts that everybody blanks out by habit when they can get a newspaper to print it as a story for free (or for the price of employing a canny PR agency).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish newspapers would realise that one of the reasons their advertising revenue is plummeting is because they are printing advertisements posing as news stories, simply because it&#8217;s an easy, cheap way to fill their pages. Why would an advertiser pay for glossy adverts that everybody blanks out by habit when they can get a newspaper to print it as a story for free (or for the price of employing a canny PR agency).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fftyfv</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/comment-page-1/#comment-27560</link>
		<dc:creator>fftyfv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 12:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/#comment-27560</guid>
		<description>Medialens are particularly good, too.

Very good at dissecting news stories. I subscribe to their &#039;media alerts&#039; which drop in to your inbox evry fornight or so, and provide illuminating critical analysis of the &#039;best&#039; UK media (Guardian, BBC, etc).

They have written two books: &#039;Guardians of Power&#039; and &#039;Newspeak for the 21st Century</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Medialens are particularly good, too.</p>
<p>Very good at dissecting news stories. I subscribe to their &#8216;media alerts&#8217; which drop in to your inbox evry fornight or so, and provide illuminating critical analysis of the &#8216;best&#8217; UK media (Guardian, BBC, etc).</p>
<p>They have written two books: &#8216;Guardians of Power&#8217; and &#8216;Newspeak for the 21st Century</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeno</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/comment-page-1/#comment-27559</link>
		<dc:creator>zeno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 10:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/#comment-27559</guid>
		<description>I third it. Well worth reading, but depressing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I third it. Well worth reading, but depressing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tileman</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/comment-page-1/#comment-27557</link>
		<dc:creator>Tileman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 08:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/#comment-27557</guid>
		<description>I have to second the recomendation for flat earth news
http://www.flatearthnews.net/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to second the recomendation for flat earth news<br />
<a href="http://www.flatearthnews.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flatearthnews.net/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drunkenoaf</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/comment-page-1/#comment-27555</link>
		<dc:creator>drunkenoaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 07:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/pr-reviewed-data/#comment-27555</guid>
		<description>@Michael Grayer: read Flat Earth News by Nick Davies; he has lots of analysis of just this type of churnalism and comes to (one) conclusion that there&#039;s so much pressure on most journos to produce content, there&#039;s no time to check facts or care about the quality. Press releases that can be easily rehashed are so tempting to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michael Grayer: read Flat Earth News by Nick Davies; he has lots of analysis of just this type of churnalism and comes to (one) conclusion that there&#8217;s so much pressure on most journos to produce content, there&#8217;s no time to check facts or care about the quality. Press releases that can be easily rehashed are so tempting to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
