<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Criticising the GM industry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:24:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lukeg</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-30413</link>
		<dc:creator>lukeg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 00:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/#comment-30413</guid>
		<description>Wow! When&#039;s the talk? I am excited about this already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! When&#8217;s the talk? I am excited about this already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MedsVsTherapy</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-30109</link>
		<dc:creator>MedsVsTherapy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/#comment-30109</guid>
		<description>another stray thought: if it is not observable, replicable, and falsifiable, then it is not science. pretty close, but not science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another stray thought: if it is not observable, replicable, and falsifiable, then it is not science. pretty close, but not science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MedsVsTherapy</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-30108</link>
		<dc:creator>MedsVsTherapy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/#comment-30108</guid>
		<description>Stunning. Has anyone told Consumer&#039;s Union, publisher of Comsumer Reports? It would be just like them to go rent some fields, and throw down some seed, and in their typical style, give a straight story. Or maybe one of these radical envoronmental groups could do the same - except that this would not be done with the hydroponics and grow-lites in the closet and such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stunning. Has anyone told Consumer&#8217;s Union, publisher of Comsumer Reports? It would be just like them to go rent some fields, and throw down some seed, and in their typical style, give a straight story. Or maybe one of these radical envoronmental groups could do the same &#8211; except that this would not be done with the hydroponics and grow-lites in the closet and such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bgamsa</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-30002</link>
		<dc:creator>bgamsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/#comment-30002</guid>
		<description>These types of restrictions are also common with Database software.  See for example http://www.allbusiness.com/technology/computer-software/4092403-1.html.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These types of restrictions are also common with Database software.  See for example <a href="http://www.allbusiness.com/technology/computer-software/4092403-1.html" rel="nofollow">www.allbusiness.com/technology/computer-software/4092403-1.html</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arabidopsis</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-29995</link>
		<dc:creator>arabidopsis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/#comment-29995</guid>
		<description>There is an immense amount of this type of research done at universities, government labs (USDA in the US), and at independent research institutes in both the UK and the US.  Ringspot virus-resistant papaya is a good example of a variety grown commercially that was not developed by an agribusiness monolith.  It saved the Hawaiian papaya industry, and the seeds are distributed without restrictive user agreements.  

Additionally, increasing yield is not always the goal of crop improvement projects.  Instead, introducing a trait such as disease-resistance reduces the amount of pesticides the grower must purchase (very expensive) and use.  Disease resistance genes can take many years to be introduced by traditional breeding but can be introduced in months by molecular methods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an immense amount of this type of research done at universities, government labs (USDA in the US), and at independent research institutes in both the UK and the US.  Ringspot virus-resistant papaya is a good example of a variety grown commercially that was not developed by an agribusiness monolith.  It saved the Hawaiian papaya industry, and the seeds are distributed without restrictive user agreements.  </p>
<p>Additionally, increasing yield is not always the goal of crop improvement projects.  Instead, introducing a trait such as disease-resistance reduces the amount of pesticides the grower must purchase (very expensive) and use.  Disease resistance genes can take many years to be introduced by traditional breeding but can be introduced in months by molecular methods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CampFreddie</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-29976</link>
		<dc:creator>CampFreddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/#comment-29976</guid>
		<description>This is just insane.  I&#039;m not against GM technology, but some of the actions of GM crop producers are just astounding.
The regulators should introduce a requirement that seed must not be sold under agreements that prevent independent testing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just insane.  I&#8217;m not against GM technology, but some of the actions of GM crop producers are just astounding.<br />
The regulators should introduce a requirement that seed must not be sold under agreements that prevent independent testing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Grayer</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-29910</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Grayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 23:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/#comment-29910</guid>
		<description>Ah, the joys of the End User License Agreement...
http://xkcd.com/501/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, the joys of the End User License Agreement&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://xkcd.com/501/" rel="nofollow">xkcd.com/501/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrible Al</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-29890</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrible Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 19:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/#comment-29890</guid>
		<description>One of the guys at work recently got a chemical formulation sample with a Licence Agreement on the label, stating that we&#039;re not allowed to actually investigate the composition of the sample (HPLC, MS etc). I think his attitude was &quot;bollocks to that&quot; as he sent a sample to analytical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the guys at work recently got a chemical formulation sample with a Licence Agreement on the label, stating that we&#8217;re not allowed to actually investigate the composition of the sample (HPLC, MS etc). I think his attitude was &#8220;bollocks to that&#8221; as he sent a sample to analytical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sili</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-29880</link>
		<dc:creator>Sili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 17:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/#comment-29880</guid>
		<description>At least it&#039;s awesome of Syngenta to engage you on the issue and perhaps listen.

Of course, if they try to pay you off, not so much, but I find it hard to believe they&#039;ll be that stupid.

Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least it&#8217;s awesome of Syngenta to engage you on the issue and perhaps listen.</p>
<p>Of course, if they try to pay you off, not so much, but I find it hard to believe they&#8217;ll be that stupid.</p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muscleman</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-29871</link>
		<dc:creator>muscleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/#comment-29871</guid>
		<description>@CoralBloom

The problem is that who will fund the trials if run by university depts? It is the same problem wrt pharmaceutical companies and trials, only the companies have the money to do trials of the necessary size. 

Government would have to step in and pay big to finance such things and if other countries will benefit from the knowledge then why would they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@CoralBloom</p>
<p>The problem is that who will fund the trials if run by university depts? It is the same problem wrt pharmaceutical companies and trials, only the companies have the money to do trials of the necessary size. </p>
<p>Government would have to step in and pay big to finance such things and if other countries will benefit from the knowledge then why would they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoralBloom</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-29857</link>
		<dc:creator>CoralBloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 12:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/#comment-29857</guid>
		<description>@Mitten
It strikes me our university agriculture and plant science departments should be getting involved with spin-offs in a big way to counter this.
Legal or not, mortgage or not, could you really sleep at night after a day working with an organisation that thinks the contracts are reasonable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mitten<br />
It strikes me our university agriculture and plant science departments should be getting involved with spin-offs in a big way to counter this.<br />
Legal or not, mortgage or not, could you really sleep at night after a day working with an organisation that thinks the contracts are reasonable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitton</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-29847</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/#comment-29847</guid>
		<description>This is a strong argument for publicly funded GM research. If we choose to leave this technology in the hands of big business we can hardly complain when they use it to make a profit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a strong argument for publicly funded GM research. If we choose to leave this technology in the hands of big business we can hardly complain when they use it to make a profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danielmcl</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-29822</link>
		<dc:creator>danielmcl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 01:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/#comment-29822</guid>
		<description>If I steal the seeds and do some comparative trials am I bound by the same agreement? Not that I&#039;m condoning theft mind you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I steal the seeds and do some comparative trials am I bound by the same agreement? Not that I&#8217;m condoning theft mind you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mus</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-29819</link>
		<dc:creator>mus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/criticising-the-gm-industry/#comment-29819</guid>
		<description>is that even a legal contract? does it hold up in court? it&#039;s like (wait for the car analogy) Ford would prohibit everyone to crash test its cars. wow. what chutzpah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is that even a legal contract? does it hold up in court? it&#8217;s like (wait for the car analogy) Ford would prohibit everyone to crash test its cars. wow. what chutzpah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

