<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LlewTube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/2010/01/llewtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net/2010/01/llewtube/</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:24:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonwade</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2010/01/llewtube/comment-page-1/#comment-38695</link>
		<dc:creator>jonwade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 03:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2010/01/llewtube/#comment-38695</guid>
		<description>£1.5 billion spent on homoeopathy each year in Europe? Mad. And they are just sugar pills. Not even sugar coated vitamin pills, just sugar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>£1.5 billion spent on homoeopathy each year in Europe? Mad. And they are just sugar pills. Not even sugar coated vitamin pills, just sugar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ftv</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2010/01/llewtube/comment-page-1/#comment-30868</link>
		<dc:creator>ftv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2010/01/llewtube/#comment-30868</guid>
		<description>The gravitational field of the moon is in fact much stronger than the field of a person sitting next to you.

The gravitational field is given by G*M/r² where G is the gravitational constant (6.673*10-11 m³/(kg¹ s²)), M is the mass of the body producing the field, and r is the distance from the body. The force on another body is proportional to this field.
So if we want to know the ratio of the moon&#039;s force to Robert&#039;s force, we just calculate
M_moon/M_robert * (r_robert/r_moon)².

M_moon = 7.35*10²² kg   (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon)
r_moon = 3.84*10⁸ m     (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_distance_%28astronomy%29)
M_robert = 80 kg        (just approximate values)
r_robert = 1 m

These values give a ratio of about 6000. This means that the gravitational pull of the moon is three orders of magnitude higher than the pull of Robert.
However, this is still no evidence that the moon should have a significant influence on us but it shows that we should be skeptical towards the arguments of skeptics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The gravitational field of the moon is in fact much stronger than the field of a person sitting next to you.</p>
<p>The gravitational field is given by G*M/r² where G is the gravitational constant (6.673*10-11 m³/(kg¹ s²)), M is the mass of the body producing the field, and r is the distance from the body. The force on another body is proportional to this field.<br />
So if we want to know the ratio of the moon&#8217;s force to Robert&#8217;s force, we just calculate<br />
M_moon/M_robert * (r_robert/r_moon)².</p>
<p>M_moon = 7.35*10²² kg   (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon" rel="nofollow">en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon</a>)<br />
r_moon = 3.84*10⁸ m     (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_distance_%28astronomy%29" rel="nofollow">en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_distance_%28astronomy%29</a>)<br />
M_robert = 80 kg        (just approximate values)<br />
r_robert = 1 m</p>
<p>These values give a ratio of about 6000. This means that the gravitational pull of the moon is three orders of magnitude higher than the pull of Robert.<br />
However, this is still no evidence that the moon should have a significant influence on us but it shows that we should be skeptical towards the arguments of skeptics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pv</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2010/01/llewtube/comment-page-1/#comment-30645</link>
		<dc:creator>pv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2010/01/llewtube/#comment-30645</guid>
		<description>Dr Aust I read your comment immediately after I watched Ben on Carpool. Obvious error on my part and am humbly apologetic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr Aust I read your comment immediately after I watched Ben on Carpool. Obvious error on my part and am humbly apologetic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Aust</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2010/01/llewtube/comment-page-1/#comment-30644</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Aust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2010/01/llewtube/#comment-30644</guid>
		<description>I meant in the little written preamble, pv.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant in the little written preamble, pv.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mash</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2010/01/llewtube/comment-page-1/#comment-30643</link>
		<dc:creator>mash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2010/01/llewtube/#comment-30643</guid>
		<description>nice hat!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice hat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AntibodyBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2010/01/llewtube/comment-page-1/#comment-30638</link>
		<dc:creator>AntibodyBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2010/01/llewtube/#comment-30638</guid>
		<description>Nerdy pedant mode: his show is called &quot;Carpool&quot;; llewtube is just a gag on the video pages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nerdy pedant mode: his show is called &#8220;Carpool&#8221;; llewtube is just a gag on the video pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pv</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2010/01/llewtube/comment-page-1/#comment-30632</link>
		<dc:creator>pv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2010/01/llewtube/#comment-30632</guid>
		<description>Dr Aust said,
January 19, 2010 at 12:57 am
&quot;You didn’t mention Baroness Greenfield, Ben!&quot;

I thought he did, and mentioned her computer games too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr Aust said,<br />
January 19, 2010 at 12:57 am<br />
&#8220;You didn’t mention Baroness Greenfield, Ben!&#8221;</p>
<p>I thought he did, and mentioned her computer games too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quick2kill</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2010/01/llewtube/comment-page-1/#comment-30627</link>
		<dc:creator>Quick2kill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2010/01/llewtube/#comment-30627</guid>
		<description>brian cox is not exactly unerringly accurtate btw.  you could do a few articles on some of the stuff he says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brian cox is not exactly unerringly accurtate btw.  you could do a few articles on some of the stuff he says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2010/01/llewtube/comment-page-1/#comment-30626</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2010/01/llewtube/#comment-30626</guid>
		<description>Great format for an interview, and good range of topics.

Though I feel for Robert when you broke out the:

&lt;i&gt;&quot;This egg sandwich does actually smell like a fart.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Hehehe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great format for an interview, and good range of topics.</p>
<p>Though I feel for Robert when you broke out the:</p>
<p><i>&#8220;This egg sandwich does actually smell like a fart.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Hehehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Aust</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2010/01/llewtube/comment-page-1/#comment-30618</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Aust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2010/01/llewtube/#comment-30618</guid>
		<description>You didn&#039;t mention Baroness Greenfield, Ben! The chat with her is actually a bit dull (at least to me), though there is a now oddly poignant (or ironic, if you prefer) bit where they drive past the RI and SG tells Llewellyn about what they do there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You didn&#8217;t mention Baroness Greenfield, Ben! The chat with her is actually a bit dull (at least to me), though there is a now oddly poignant (or ironic, if you prefer) bit where they drive past the RI and SG tells Llewellyn about what they do there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pv</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2010/01/llewtube/comment-page-1/#comment-30617</link>
		<dc:creator>pv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2010/01/llewtube/#comment-30617</guid>
		<description>Great! I enjoyed that. Ten years might be a bit excessive, but a couple of hours of chat would have been good. 
Don&#039;t agree though that the motivation of chiroquacks or homeoquacks is so unimportant with regard to their attempts to get their critics to &quot;shut up&quot;. I would have thought their motivation is the one thing that should be exposed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great! I enjoyed that. Ten years might be a bit excessive, but a couple of hours of chat would have been good.<br />
Don&#8217;t agree though that the motivation of chiroquacks or homeoquacks is so unimportant with regard to their attempts to get their critics to &#8220;shut up&#8221;. I would have thought their motivation is the one thing that should be exposed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

