<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bad Science &#187; adverts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/category/adverts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Caroline Pidgeon (lib dem) falls for bogus Rentokil story, in the London Assembly&#8230; UPDATED for un-fail</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2010/03/lib-dem-councillor-caroline-pidgeon-falls-for-bogus-rentokil-story-in-the-london-assembly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2010/03/lib-dem-councillor-caroline-pidgeon-falls-for-bogus-rentokil-story-in-the-london-assembly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2010/03/lib-dem-councillor-caroline-pidgeon-falls-for-bogus-rentokil-story-in-the-london-assembly/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Briefly. Lib Dem councillor Caroline Pidgeon raised the bogus Rentokil stories in the London Assembly yesterday: and fell for them, hook, line and sinker. People often forget that politicians &#8211; as much as anyone else &#8211; get their information about how the world works from reading newspapers. I guess this is fairly good evidence that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2010/03/lib-dem-councillor-caroline-pidgeon-falls-for-bogus-rentokil-story-in-the-london-assembly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obvious quacks: the tip of a scary medical iceberg</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2010/02/obvious-quacks-the-tip-of-a-scary-medical-iceberg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2010/02/obvious-quacks-the-tip-of-a-scary-medical-iceberg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulating research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2010/02/obvious-quacks-the-tip-of-a-scary-medical-iceberg/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre, The Guardian, Saturday 27 February, 2010 After the Science and Technology committee report this week, and the jaw dropping stupidity of “we bring you both sides” in the media coverage afterwards, you are bored of homeopathy. So am I, but it gives a very simple window into the wider disasters in all of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2010/02/obvious-quacks-the-tip-of-a-scary-medical-iceberg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>120</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chilling warning to parents from top neuroscientist</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/05/professor-baroness-susan-greenfield-cbe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2009/05/professor-baroness-susan-greenfield-cbe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 23:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competing interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great popularisers of science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scare stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/05/professor-baroness-susan-greenfield-cbe/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Edit midday Saturday: I&#8217;ve just read the Guardian version and it&#8217;s been cut a bit, whole chunks missing, and bits rewritten. This is the best reason to have a blog. Anyway, if Baroness Greenfield responds &#8211; and naturally I hope she will, as there is a great deal more to say on this topic &#8211; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2009/05/professor-baroness-susan-greenfield-cbe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You are 80% less likely to die from a meteor landing on your head if you wear a bicycle helmet all day.</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/11/you-are-80-less-likely-to-die-from-a-meteor-landing-on-your-head-if-you-wear-a-bicycle-helmet-all-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/11/you-are-80-less-likely-to-die-from-a-meteor-landing-on-your-head-if-you-wear-a-bicycle-helmet-all-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 02:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presenting numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/11/you-are-80-less-likely-to-die-from-a-meteor-landing-on-your-head-if-you-wear-a-bicycle-helmet-all-day/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re all suckers for a big number, and you&#8217;ll be delighted to hear that the Journal of Consumer Research has huge teams of scientists all eagerly writing up their sinister research on how to exploit us. One excellent study this month looked at how people choose a digital camera. This will become relevant in three [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/11/you-are-80-less-likely-to-die-from-a-meteor-landing-on-your-head-if-you-wear-a-bicycle-helmet-all-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Medicalisation of Everyday Life</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/the-medicalisation-of-everyday-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/the-medicalisation-of-everyday-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 05:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equazen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fish oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicalisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/the-medicalisation-of-everyday-life/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the pace of medical innovation slows to a crawl, how do drug companies stay in profit? By &#8216;discovering&#8217; new illnesses to fit existing products. But, says Ben Goldacre, in the second extract from his new book, for many problems the cure will never be found in a pill. Ben Goldacre The Guardian Monday September [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/the-medicalisation-of-everyday-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dore &#8211; the media&#8217;s miracle cure for dyslexia</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/dore-the-medias-miracle-cure-for-dyslexia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/dore-the-medias-miracle-cure-for-dyslexia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 00:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miracles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do you judge if an intervention is effective when you hear about it in the media? Perhaps you tot up the balance of opinions. Perhaps you do it unconsciously. You might have noticed the Dore &#8220;miracle cure&#8221; for dyslexia, invented by millionaire paint entrepreneur Wynford Dore. It&#8217;s hard to ignore. In fact just recently [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/dore-the-medias-miracle-cure-for-dyslexia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pep, zing, oomph, ker-ching. CoQ10.</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/03/pep-zing-oomph-ker-ching/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/03/pep-zing-oomph-ker-ching/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 02:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicalisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian, Saturday March 15 2008 Doctors love pills: so do the public, and the media, and of course so do pill companies. When one pill dies, another must take its place. Are you feeling tired? Demotivated? I bet you are. But there is a solution &#8211; a pill &#8211; pushed by no [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/03/pep-zing-oomph-ker-ching/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washing the numbers, selling the model</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/01/washing-the-numbers-selling-the-model/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/01/washing-the-numbers-selling-the-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicalisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurostuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulating research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian, Saturday January 26 2008 If there&#8217;s one thing I love, it&#8217;s academics who take on the work of investigative journalism, because they are dogged. This has been a bad week for the SSRI antidepressants. First there&#8217;s the stuff you already know: bad data got buried. In a cracking new analysis of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/01/washing-the-numbers-selling-the-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Epistemological Indulgences</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/12/epistemological-indulgences/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/12/epistemological-indulgences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 14:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chocolate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian, Saturday December 22 2007 Christmas is a time for harmless lies, the chocolatey indulgences of the thought world. We know when to stop, because if we all acted on our belief in Santa there would be no presents: and then Christmas would be meaningless. My favourite Christmas traditions are the &#8220;red [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/12/epistemological-indulgences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The fishy reckoning</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/the-fishy-reckoning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/the-fishy-reckoning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 01:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash-for-"stories"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fish oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicalisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mirror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian Saturday September 22 2007 So you will remember the fish oil pill stories of last year. For the new kids: pill company Equazen and Durham Council said they were doing a trial on them with their GCSE year, but it wasn&#8217;t really a proper trial, for example there was no control [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/the-fishy-reckoning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clarion Communications respond on the rigged Jessica Alba wiggle&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/clarion-communications-respond-on-the-rigged-jessica-alba-wiggle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/clarion-communications-respond-on-the-rigged-jessica-alba-wiggle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash-for-"stories"]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s nothing I like better than people engaging in a discussion about ideas &#8211; and indeed criticising mine &#8211; but if there are two messages I&#8217;d really like to get out there, for general use, it&#8217;s these: ad hominem attacks are a bit pathetic you cannot make me go away simply by telling people my [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/clarion-communications-respond-on-the-rigged-jessica-alba-wiggle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patrick Holford&#8217;s untruthful and unsubstantiated claims about pills</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/patrick-holford-unsubstantiated-untruthful/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/patrick-holford-unsubstantiated-untruthful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competing interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicalisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick holford]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, you lot are seriously on a roll. Following a complaint from a badscience reader, the ASA have found that Patrick Holford made untruthful, unsubstantiated claims in a leaflet he was sending out. Pasted below is the full adjudication and also the original advert in question, so that you can decide for yourself about the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/patrick-holford-unsubstantiated-untruthful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perpetual truths</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/steorn-perpetual-motion-machine-demo-fails-astonishingly-to-materialise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/steorn-perpetual-motion-machine-demo-fails-astonishingly-to-materialise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 00:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perpetual motion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Saturday July 7, 2007 The Guardian You might remember an Irish company called Steorn: in August 2006 they took out a full page advert in the Economist to announce that they had discovered a source of free energy, a perpetual motion machine no less, in triumphant defiance of that stuffy first law of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/steorn-perpetual-motion-machine-demo-fails-astonishingly-to-materialise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Amazing Qlink Science Pedant</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/the-amazing-qlink-science-pedant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/the-amazing-qlink-science-pedant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 02:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrosensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick holford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qlink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Saturday May 19, 2007 The Guardian Normally I&#8217;d ignore quack medical devices, but when the catalogue from Health Products For Life &#8211; run by vitamin pill salesman Patrick Holford &#8211; arrived, I found an unexpected treat waiting for me. Among his usual &#8220;special formulation&#8221; pill-peddling banter, there was the QLink pendant, at just [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/the-amazing-qlink-science-pedant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Pill Problem</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/03/the-pill-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/03/the-pill-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 00:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicalisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Saturday March 31, 2007 The Guardian Direct to consumer drug adverts in America are a proper joy, and especially the TV ones: your life is in disarray, your restless legs/migraine/cholesterol have taken over, all is panic, there is no sense any where. Then, when you take the right pill, suddenly the screen brightens [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/03/the-pill-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s wrong with Dr Gillian McKeith PhD?</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/02/ms-gillian-mckeith-banned-from-calling-herself-a-doctor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/02/ms-gillian-mckeith-banned-from-calling-herself-a-doctor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 00:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gillian mckeith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PhDs, doctors, and qualifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stifling criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For years, &#8216;Dr&#8217; Gillian McKeith has used her title to sell TV shows, diet books and herbal sex pills. Now the Advertising Standards Authority has stepped in. Yet the real problem is not what she calls herself, but the mumbo-jumbo she dresses up as scientific fact, says Ben Goldacre Ben Goldacre Monday February 12, 2007 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/02/ms-gillian-mckeith-banned-from-calling-herself-a-doctor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>313</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.stablesound.co.uk/mp3/drgillian.mp3" length="2058765" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://badscience.net/files/gillian_ire_radio.mp3" length="8844852" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s some data in here somewhere&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/10/trout-are-freshwater-fish-and-have-underwater-weapons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2006/10/trout-are-freshwater-fish-and-have-underwater-weapons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 00:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equazen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fish oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[references]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Saturday October 7, 2006 The Guardian It is often unfairly assumed that I am a tenacious obsessive who refuses to let go. So at Durham council &#8211; as reported all over the newspapers and television &#8211; they&#8217;ve done loads of research on omega-3 fish oils making kids clever. It&#8217;s all very well saying [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2006/10/trout-are-freshwater-fish-and-have-underwater-weapons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Quantitative Analysis Of The Frequency With Which One Company Is Promoted, And  By Whom, In UK National Newspapers UPDATED 30/9/06</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/09/a-quantitative-analysis-of-the-frequency-with-which-one-company-is-promoted-and-by-whom-in-uk-national-newspapers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2006/09/a-quantitative-analysis-of-the-frequency-with-which-one-company-is-promoted-and-by-whom-in-uk-national-newspapers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telegraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A Quantitative Analysis Of The Frequency With Which One Company Is Promoted, And By Whom, In UK National Newspapers&#8221; Updated 16th September 2006. Dr Ben Goldacre (Corresponding Author) Bad Science Research Institute, www.badscience.net ben@badscience.net Introduction. Susan Clark is an alternative therapy columnist who recently made a cheeky attack on her critics. It was subsequently noted [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2006/09/a-quantitative-analysis-of-the-frequency-with-which-one-company-is-promoted-and-by-whom-in-uk-national-newspapers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Trial That Ate Itself</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/09/the-trial-that-ate-itself/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2006/09/the-trial-that-ate-itself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 00:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equazen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fish oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[references]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Saturday September 9, 2006 The Guardian Fish oil is clearly a matter of huge national importance. Channel 4 and ITV (and the Daily Mail, and the BBC) all report on a plan by education officials in County Durham to give £1 million worth of omega-3 fish oils, to 5,000 children as they approach [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2006/09/the-trial-that-ate-itself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>122</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Now Look What You&#8217;ve Made Me Do&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/now-look-what-youve-made-me-do/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/now-look-what-youve-made-me-do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dangers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbal remedies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Poor old Susan Clark, previously a regular Bad Science target when she was writing &#8220;What&#8217;s The Alternative&#8221; in the Sunday Times, she is now in a position of total safety at The Observer. Apparently in the past the poor thing has had such a hammering for her advice on malaria medication, that now her readers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/now-look-what-youve-made-me-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

