<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bad Science &#187; book reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/category/book-reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Nice review of my book in the British Medical Journal by Richard Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/nice-review-of-the-book-in-the-british-medical-journal-by-richard-smith/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/nice-review-of-the-book-in-the-british-medical-journal-by-richard-smith/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onanism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/nice-review-of-the-book-in-the-british-medical-journal-by-richard-smith/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reproduced cheekily below. He&#8217;s Arthur Smith&#8216;s brother, don&#8217;t you know. Published 1 October 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a1856 www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/337/oct01_3/a1856 Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1856 Views &#38; Reviews Review of the Week Becoming Ben Richard Smith, director, Ovations Chronic Disease Initiative richardswsmith@yahoo.co.uk Ben Goldacre’s book assembles an impressive array of villains who deal in bad science, finds Richard Smith [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/nice-review-of-the-book-in-the-british-medical-journal-by-richard-smith/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Generous review of my book in the Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/generous-review-of-my-book-in-the-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/generous-review-of-my-book-in-the-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 22:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telegraph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/generous-review-of-my-book-in-the-daily-telegraph/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a very nice review of my book &#8220;Bad Science&#8221; in the Telegraph this week. I have to say I&#8217;m delighted to see that the two newspapers I&#8217;ve probably been meanest about over recent years are the two that have reviewed it so far. This betrays a genuinely wholesome grown up approach to life which [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/generous-review-of-my-book-in-the-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Haha w00t I am &#8220;Health Book Of The Week&#8221; in the Daily Mail</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/bad-science-reviewed-in-the-daily-mail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/bad-science-reviewed-in-the-daily-mail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onanism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/bad-science-reviewed-in-the-daily-mail/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Click on the image to read it]. I don&#8217;t know how I managed to miss this, but my cheeky tome &#8220;Bad Science&#8221; was Health Book Of The Week in the Daily Mail last Tuesday. There are three things I find interesting about their review. 1. I am Health Book Of The Week in the Daily [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/bad-science-reviewed-in-the-daily-mail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

