<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bad Science &#187; book</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/category/book/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Matthias Rath &#8211; steal this chapter</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/04/matthias-rath-steal-this-chapter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2009/04/matthias-rath-steal-this-chapter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BANT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matthias rath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/04/matthias-rath-steal-this-chapter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the &#8220;missing chapter&#8221; about vitamin pill salesman Matthias Rath. Sadly I was unable to write about him at the time that book was initially published, as he was suing my ass in the High Court. The chapter is now available in the new paperback edition, and I&#8217;ve posted it here for free so [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2009/04/matthias-rath-steal-this-chapter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>126</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nice review of my book in the British Medical Journal by Richard Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/nice-review-of-the-book-in-the-british-medical-journal-by-richard-smith/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/nice-review-of-the-book-in-the-british-medical-journal-by-richard-smith/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onanism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/nice-review-of-the-book-in-the-british-medical-journal-by-richard-smith/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reproduced cheekily below. He&#8217;s Arthur Smith&#8216;s brother, don&#8217;t you know. Published 1 October 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a1856 www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/337/oct01_3/a1856 Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1856 Views &#38; Reviews Review of the Week Becoming Ben Richard Smith, director, Ovations Chronic Disease Initiative richardswsmith@yahoo.co.uk Ben Goldacre’s book assembles an impressive array of villains who deal in bad science, finds Richard Smith [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/nice-review-of-the-book-in-the-british-medical-journal-by-richard-smith/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Generous review of my book in the Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/generous-review-of-my-book-in-the-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/generous-review-of-my-book-in-the-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 22:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telegraph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/generous-review-of-my-book-in-the-daily-telegraph/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a very nice review of my book &#8220;Bad Science&#8221; in the Telegraph this week. I have to say I&#8217;m delighted to see that the two newspapers I&#8217;ve probably been meanest about over recent years are the two that have reviewed it so far. This betrays a genuinely wholesome grown up approach to life which [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/generous-review-of-my-book-in-the-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Haha w00t I am &#8220;Health Book Of The Week&#8221; in the Daily Mail</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/bad-science-reviewed-in-the-daily-mail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/bad-science-reviewed-in-the-daily-mail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onanism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/bad-science-reviewed-in-the-daily-mail/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Click on the image to read it]. I don&#8217;t know how I managed to miss this, but my cheeky tome &#8220;Bad Science&#8221; was Health Book Of The Week in the Daily Mail last Tuesday. There are three things I find interesting about their review. 1. I am Health Book Of The Week in the Daily [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/bad-science-reviewed-in-the-daily-mail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ohh look I&#8217;m on the One Show on BBC One</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/ohh-look-im-on-the-one-show-on-bbc-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/ohh-look-im-on-the-one-show-on-bbc-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onanism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/ohh-look-im-on-the-one-show-on-bbc-one/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slightly tiggerish and lacking in gravitas but that&#8217;s roughly what you&#8217;d expect from a 12 year old delivering a 100,000 word thesis on mainstream television in 3 minutes. www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00dcy6n/ It starts 8 minutes in. As you can see the presenters really engaged with the film, they loved the book, and it triggered a thought-provoking discussion [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/ohh-look-im-on-the-one-show-on-bbc-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

