<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bad Science &#187; climate change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/category/climate-change-denialists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Daily Telegraph misrepresent a scientist&#8217;s work, then refuse to correct it when he writes to them.</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/01/the-telegraph-misrepresent-a-scientists-work-on-climate-and-then-refuse-to-correct-it-when-he-writes-to-them/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2009/01/the-telegraph-misrepresent-a-scientists-work-on-climate-and-then-refuse-to-correct-it-when-he-writes-to-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telegraph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/01/the-telegraph-misrepresent-a-scientists-work-on-climate-and-then-refuse-to-correct-it-when-he-writes-to-them/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People in the &#8220;public engagement&#8221; community often talk about how scientists should do more to communicate with the media. I take a different line: scientists have good grounds to be extremely nervous, and some entities and journalists could quite fairly be blacklisted. Here&#8217;s just one more example. It doesn&#8217;t stand out, I get sent plenty [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2009/01/the-telegraph-misrepresent-a-scientists-work-on-climate-and-then-refuse-to-correct-it-when-he-writes-to-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>119</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trivial Disputes</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/02/trivial-disputes-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/02/trivial-disputes-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 04:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[badscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drurrrgs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telegraph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are no difficult ideas in this column. Like, for example, when I tell you about the Daily Telegraph front page headline which says &#8220;Abuse of cannabis puts 500 a week in hospital&#8221;, and it turns out they&#8217;re actually quoting a figure from a report on the number of people having contact with any drug [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/02/trivial-disputes-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>God delights as Pope transpires not to be total ass.</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/12/god-delights-as-pope-transpires-not-to-be-ass/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/12/god-delights-as-pope-transpires-not-to-be-ass/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian, Saturday December 15 2007 &#8220;The Pope condemns the climate change prophets of doom,&#8221; roared the headline on Thursday. Basically if the Daily Mail goes out of business, I&#8217;ll have to give up this column. &#8220;Pope Benedict XVI has launched a surprise attack on climate change prophets of doom, warning them that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/12/god-delights-as-pope-transpires-not-to-be-ass/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Credit where it&#8217;s due</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/03/credit-where-its-due/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/03/credit-where-its-due/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It had been so slaughtered by the time Friday came around that there was no way I could write about the Global Warming documentary with any poise, since it had all been done to death. Steve Connor in the Independent was truly exemplary, and in case you missed it, here it is. Go sister. news.independent.co.uk/environment/climate_change/article2355956.ece]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/03/credit-where-its-due/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>185</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insert &#8220;swindle&#8221; joke here.</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/03/insert-swindle-gag-here/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/03/insert-swindle-gag-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 00:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Thursday night, Channel 4 broadcast what it described as a &#8220;controversial documentary&#8221;. It was essentially the same rather elderly climate denialist arguments that have been seen many times before &#8211; and assessed, and refuted &#8211; but packaged up with a bit of drama, as if they were new and unheard of. That wasn&#8217;t the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/03/insert-swindle-gag-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>152</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Against Nature &#8211; Channel 4 tonight</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/03/against-nature-channel-4-tonight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/03/against-nature-channel-4-tonight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So as I&#8217;m sure most of you know, tonight there is a documentary about how we don&#8217;t need to worry about global warming. www.channel4.com/science/microsites/G/great_global_warming_swindle/index.html Whatever your feelings about climate change, there are good reasons to to have serious concerns about the film: It&#8217;s made by Martin Durkin. In 1997 he made a series called Against [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/03/against-nature-channel-4-tonight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>130</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

