<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bad Science &#187; acupuncture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/category/complementary-medicine/acupuncture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>BMJ Column &#8211; Beware of mentioning psychosocial factors</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/bmj-column-beware-of-mentioning-psychosocial-factors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/bmj-column-beware-of-mentioning-psychosocial-factors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 00:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[acupuncture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicalisation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/bmj-column-beware-of-mentioning-psychosocial-factors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How doctors describe the many interactions between a person, their illness, and society has little purchase in the crudely dualistic world of popular culture. Ben Goldacre Observations &#8211; Media watch BMJ 2007;335:801 (20 October) Although we are constantly told to &#8220;engage with the public,&#8221; many doctors and academics avoid the media like the plague. This [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/bmj-column-beware-of-mentioning-psychosocial-factors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://badscience.net/files/whydoctorsdonttalktothemedia.mp3" length="8409887" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medicalisation &#8211; don&#8217;t take it lying down.</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/542/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/542/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 01:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[acupuncture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicalisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[placebo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian Saturday September 29 2007 One thing that always fascinates me, as I tug on my pipe in this armchair, is how reductionist, how mechanical, how sciencey and medical we like our stories about the body to be. This week a major new study was published on acupuncture. Many newspapers said it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/542/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Acupuncture and back pain: some interesting background references</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/acupuncture-and-back-pain-some-interesting-background-references/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/acupuncture-and-back-pain-some-interesting-background-references/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[acupuncture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[placebo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was just on Radio 4&#8242;s PM program talking about the acupuncture study that&#8217;s in the news today, you can listen to it here (37 minutes in to the programme): www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/news/pm/ Here are some references and background bits and bobs. The paper itself was very interesting. It took 1200 people, with an average of 8 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/acupuncture-and-back-pain-some-interesting-background-references/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>112</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>False advertising is not the remedy</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2004/03/false-advertising-is-not-the-remedy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2004/03/false-advertising-is-not-the-remedy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 03:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[acupuncture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[False advertising is not the remedy Ben Goldacre Thursday March 11, 2004 The Guardian Talk bad science Â· I wouldn&#8217;t want you to feel powerless in the face of the new dark ages irrationality: there&#8217;s so much more to being a bad science activist than just feeling smug after winning an argument at a party, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2004/03/false-advertising-is-not-the-remedy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chocolates and homeopathy</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2003/04/30/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2003/04/30/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2003 02:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[acupuncture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chocolate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chocolates and homeopathy Ben Goldacre Thursday April 24, 2003 The Guardian New: Talk about Bad science Â· I was delighted to see that the government has given Â£1.3m to the pseudo-scientists marketing alternative therapies such as homeopathy and acupuncture. This money will go towards research projects to determine whether their money-making scams really help people, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2003/04/30/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

