<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bad Science &#187; homeopathy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/category/complementary-medicine/homeopathy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast on government response to SciTech NHS homeopathy report</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2010/07/podcast-on-government-response-to-scitech-nhs-homeopathy-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2010/07/podcast-on-government-response-to-scitech-nhs-homeopathy-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulating nonsense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=1739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I zipped off this quick podcast from my phone on Monday and put it on my secondary blog, which I run for scrappy stuff. People seemed to like it a bit so I&#8217;m reposting here. There&#8217;s more audio stuff coming, a bit of video too, and I&#8217;ll work out good feeds and iTunes stuff over [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2010/07/podcast-on-government-response-to-scitech-nhs-homeopathy-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://badscience.net/files/homeop.mp3" length="28180593" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://www.badscience.net/files/homeop.mp3" length="28180593" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The BBC have found someone whose cancer was cured by homeopathy</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2010/02/the-bbc-have-found-someone-whose-cancer-was-cured-by-homeopathy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2010/02/the-bbc-have-found-someone-whose-cancer-was-cured-by-homeopathy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2010/02/the-bbc-have-found-someone-whose-cancer-was-cured-by-homeopathy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ladies and Gentlemen, we have hit the bottom of the barrel. Homeopathy cured my cancer, on BBC News.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2010/02/the-bbc-have-found-someone-whose-cancer-was-cured-by-homeopathy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>123</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parliamentary Sci Tech Committee on Homeopathy</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2010/02/parliamentary-sci-tech-committee-on-homeopathy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2010/02/parliamentary-sci-tech-committee-on-homeopathy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2010/02/parliamentary-sci-tech-committee-on-homeopathy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s the report, press release below. It looks like pretty sensible stuff to me, homeopaths can&#8217;t expect special treatment among all forms of medicine, if the evidence actively shows it doesn&#8217;t work, then that&#8217;s that. I have to say what really frightens me about all this is the MHRA: if regulation is so political that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2010/02/parliamentary-sci-tech-committee-on-homeopathy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All bow before the mighty power of the nocebo effect</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/11/all-bow-before-the-mighty-power-of-the-nocebo-effect/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2009/11/all-bow-before-the-mighty-power-of-the-nocebo-effect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[placebo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/11/all-bow-before-the-mighty-power-of-the-nocebo-effect/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre, Saturday 28 November 2009, The Guardian This week the parliamentary science and technology select committee looked into the evidence behind the MHRA’s decision to allow homeopathy sugar pill labels to make medical claims without evidence of efficacy, and the funding of homeopathy on the NHS. There were some comedy highlights, as you might [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2009/11/all-bow-before-the-mighty-power-of-the-nocebo-effect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parliamentary Science and Technology Select Committee on homeopathy today</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/11/parliamentary-science-and-technology-select-committee-on-homeopathy-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2009/11/parliamentary-science-and-technology-select-committee-on-homeopathy-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/11/parliamentary-science-and-technology-select-committee-on-homeopathy-today/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I gave evidence at the Parliamentary SciTech committtee today for their enquiry into whether the government had used scientific evidence properly in making their decisions about MHRA licenses for homeopathic pills, and homeopathy treatment on the NHS. This was a mini-enquiry as a result of interest expressed by the public, which is excellently democratic, you [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2009/11/parliamentary-science-and-technology-select-committee-on-homeopathy-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hot foul air</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/11/hot-foul-air/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/11/hot-foul-air/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 07:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mondo academico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PhDs, doctors, and qualifications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/11/hot-foul-air/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian Saturday 1st November 2008 Guy Ritchie has cancelled Madonna&#8217;s order for tens of thousands of pounds worth of special Kabbalah water to fill their swimming pool. It&#8217;s always uncomfortable when we have to humour someone close to us in the name of avoiding conflict. Right now in Thames Valley University, for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/11/hot-foul-air/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill Nelson wins the internet.</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/08/bill-nelson-wins-the-internet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/08/bill-nelson-wins-the-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 07:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[badscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pseudodiagnoses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/08/bill-nelson-wins-the-internet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian, Saturday August 9 2008 Silly season is in full swing. At the Telegraph, their correspondent has gone for a bioenergetic health audit. “The resident homoeopath, Katie Jermine, quizzed me about my diet, stress levels and lifestyle. She then strapped on a wristband and plugged me into an electronic device called the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/08/bill-nelson-wins-the-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The stupid, it burns&#8230; now with added &#8220;Feynman Chaser&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/03/the-stupid-it-burns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/03/the-stupid-it-burns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 00:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No column this week, sorry about that, I forgot that Jesus died for our sins yesterday so I couldn&#8217;t give the company I was writing about a fair chance to respond. The story will pop up later as a bigger feature. In the meantime, no matter how hard I try to be bored of quackery, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/03/the-stupid-it-burns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All bow before the might of the placebo effect, it is the coolest strangest thing in medicine</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/03/all-bow-before-the-might-of-the-placebo-effect-it-is-the-coolest-strangest-thing-in-medicine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/03/all-bow-before-the-might-of-the-placebo-effect-it-is-the-coolest-strangest-thing-in-medicine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 01:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[placebo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulating research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian, Saturday March 1 2008 It was fun to hear universal jubilation over the new meta-analysis showing once again that some antidepressants aren&#8217;t much cop in mild or moderate depression: most of all on the Today programme, where a newsreader said the industry was contesting the study on the basis that it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/03/all-bow-before-the-might-of-the-placebo-effect-it-is-the-coolest-strangest-thing-in-medicine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Magnificent torrent of canards in parliament from David Tredinnick MP</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/02/magnificent-torrent-of-canards-in-parliament-from-david-tredinnick-mp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/02/magnificent-torrent-of-canards-in-parliament-from-david-tredinnick-mp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Tredinnick is conservative MP for Bosworth (he was suspended without pay during the cash for questions scandal) and very keen on alternative therapies. Here is a fabulous speech from him in parliament yesterday. As you can see, he talks up the use of homeopathy as a treatment for HIV, malaria, and a whole host [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/02/magnificent-torrent-of-canards-in-parliament-from-david-tredinnick-mp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aids Quackery International Tour</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/12/aids-quackery-international-tour/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/12/aids-quackery-international-tour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 00:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbal remedies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2007/12/aids-quackery-international-tour/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian Saturday December 1 2007 If you were going to be actuarial about media coverage &#8211; an eighth of a column inch for each premature death perhaps &#8211; then this paper would be filled with diarrhoea and Aids. Today is World Aids Day: so come with me on a world tour of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/12/aids-quackery-international-tour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>106</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Here&#8217;s something you don&#8217;t see every day.</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/heres-something-you-dont-see-every-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/heres-something-you-dont-see-every-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/heres-something-you-dont-see-every-day/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jesus Christ, the Guardian sold the homeopathy pieces on to them&#8230; I&#8217;m in the Daily Mail. www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/health/healthmain.html?in_article_id=496612&#038;in_page_id=1774 Things to notice include: 1. I am in the Daily Mail. 2. I managed to describe the media&#8217;s MMR hoax as &#8220;the media&#8217;s MMR hoax&#8221; in the Daily Mail. 3. This is almost as cool as the time [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/heres-something-you-dont-see-every-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The end of homeopathy?</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/a-kind-of-magic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/a-kind-of-magic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/a-kind-of-magic/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time after time, properly conducted scientific studies have proved that homeopathic remedies work no better than simple placebos. So why do so many sensible people swear by them? And why do homeopaths believe they are victims of a smear campaign? Ben Goldacre follows a trail of fudged statistics, bogus surveys and widespread self-deception. Ben Goldacre [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/a-kind-of-magic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>489</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Lancet &#8211; &#8220;Benefits and risks of homoeopathy&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/the-lancet-benefits-and-risks-of-homoeopathy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/the-lancet-benefits-and-risks-of-homoeopathy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/the-lancet-benefits-and-risks-of-homoeopathy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a piece I wrote in today&#8217;s edition of The Lancet. You can also see this article there in a nice Lancet PDF, along with a &#8220;world report&#8221; on homeopathy, and the references in pleasantly accessible Crossref format. To be honest, it almost feels silly writing about homeopathy in the Lancet. &#8220;Benefits and risks [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/the-lancet-benefits-and-risks-of-homoeopathy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>88</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appendix: Andy&#8217;s incredibly polite email to the Society of Homeopaths</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/10/appendix-andys-incredibly-polite-email-to-the-society-of-homeopaths/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/10/appendix-andys-incredibly-polite-email-to-the-society-of-homeopaths/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 10:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stifling criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To my mind this is one of the most important parts of the story about the Society of Homeopaths bullying its critics: it&#8217;s the incredibly polite and courteous email that Dr Andy Lewis sent to the SoH after his hosting company received the first threatening letter from their solicitors. How did the SoH respond to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/10/appendix-andys-incredibly-polite-email-to-the-society-of-homeopaths/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A corporate conspiracy to silence alternative medicine?</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/10/how-dare-you-criticise-their-ideas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/10/how-dare-you-criticise-their-ideas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 08:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stifling criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian Saturday October 20 2007 Let’s imagine that we live in an exotic parallel universe where I am able to use an amusing but trivial news event to illustrate a wider cultural and intellectual issue. Dr Andy Lewis runs a website called Quackometer: he criticised the Society of Homeopaths (Europe ’s largest [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/10/how-dare-you-criticise-their-ideas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A homeopath (inventor, visionary) responds</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/a-homeopath-responds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/a-homeopath-responds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, I&#8217;ve got a few interesting follow-ups to post, starting with Peter Chappell who you will remember from last week&#8216;s Bad Science column in the Guardian. As you know I am always keen to engage in discussion with people &#8211; see here for example &#8211; and particularly keen to hear my own ideas and criticisms [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/a-homeopath-responds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Homeopathy gives you Aids</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/homeopathy-gives-you-aids/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/homeopathy-gives-you-aids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 23:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[placebo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian September 15th, 2007 Okay now look: there’s nothing wrong with the idea of homeopaths giving out sugar pills. The placebo effect can be very powerful, because it’s not just about the pill, it’s about the cultural meaning of the treatment: so we know from research that four placebo sugar pills a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/homeopathy-gives-you-aids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Memory of Water?&#8221; &#8211; Journal Club roundup and submissions for publication</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/528/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/528/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 01:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journal club]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many thanks to everyone who took part in the Homeopathy Journal Club. The standard of commentary was very high and I think a fair amount of this stuff deserves the chance to be published in the journal itself. I know a couple of people have already submitted their work as letters, but just in case, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/528/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chatting to a homeopath</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/chatting-to-a-homeopath/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/chatting-to-a-homeopath/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry there was no column last week. I have not been killed in bizarre sexual experiment that went horribly wrong, a problem came up and I was out of earshot on my way to a conference, no excitement this time. Anyway, on my way through Manchester yesterday I came across Prof David Colquhoun having a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/chatting-to-a-homeopath/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://badscience.net/files/colquhoun%20lee%20bpc%202007%20debate.mp3" length="35104938" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://badscience.net/files/felicity%20lee%20bpc%202007%20chat.mp3" length="28512886" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://badscience.net/files/colquhoun_lee_bpc_2007_debate.mp3" length="35104938" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://badscience.net/files/felicity_lee_bpc_2007_chat.mp3" length="28512886" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

