<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bad Science &#187; dore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/category/dore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>In praise of chaotic puerile disseminated investigative journalism</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/03/in-praise-of-puerile-chaotic-disseminated-investigative-journalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2009/03/in-praise-of-puerile-chaotic-disseminated-investigative-journalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=1047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a video of the bloggers&#8217; session at the totally excellent Convention On Modern Liberty a few weeks ago. My bit starts at 11min:10secs, and I speak in a crescendoingly impassioned manner in praise of chaotic puerile disseminated investigative journalism, this time in relation to the Dore &#8220;miracle cure for dyslexia&#8221; saga. Although this was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2009/03/in-praise-of-puerile-chaotic-disseminated-investigative-journalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogs vs mainstream media</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/blogs-vs-mainstream-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/blogs-vs-mainstream-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 01:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian, Saturday May 31 2008 You will remember last week we were talking about the £2,000 Dore &#8220;miracle cure&#8221; for dyslexia, invented by paint entrepreneur Wynford Dore. It had been pushed unrelentingly in the media, despite multiple Ofcom and ITC judgements, and through personal endorsement by Kenny Logan, who, it turned out, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/blogs-vs-mainstream-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dore &#8211; the media&#8217;s miracle cure for dyslexia</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/dore-the-medias-miracle-cure-for-dyslexia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/dore-the-medias-miracle-cure-for-dyslexia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 00:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miracles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do you judge if an intervention is effective when you hear about it in the media? Perhaps you tot up the balance of opinions. Perhaps you do it unconsciously. You might have noticed the Dore &#8220;miracle cure&#8221; for dyslexia, invented by millionaire paint entrepreneur Wynford Dore. It&#8217;s hard to ignore. In fact just recently [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/dore-the-medias-miracle-cure-for-dyslexia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dore &#8211; The Miracle Cure For Dyslexia</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/the-miracle-cure-for-dyslexia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/the-miracle-cure-for-dyslexia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 01:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain gym]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mirror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[references]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Saturday November 4, 2006 The Guardian Wouldn&#8217;t it be great if there really was an expensive proprietary cure for dyslexia? Oh hang on, there is: paint tycoon Wynford Dore has developed one, with NASA space technology. It&#8217;s only £1700, it has celebrity endorsements, it involves some special exercises, but it has been proven [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/the-miracle-cure-for-dyslexia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

