<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bad Science &#187; evening standard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/category/media/evening-standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tesco Value Science</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/324/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/324/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 01:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash-for-"stories"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evening standard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben GoldacreSaturday November 18, 2006The Guardian I am going into PR: it&#39;s just too easy. Let&#39;s say you&#39;re running the account for some Tesco &#34;sports initiative&#34;. You&#39;re doing great work for the kids, but nobody cares, because it&#39;s just another corporate wheeze. You could always pay for adverts. Or you could just find an academic [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2006/11/324/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brainiac &#8220;Fraud&#8221; &#8220;Slammed&#8221; In The Evening Standard And The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/07/brainiac-fake-experiments-scandal-make-it-to-the-evening-standard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2006/07/brainiac-fake-experiments-scandal-make-it-to-the-evening-standard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 21:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brainiac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evening standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And some of you have been quoted. Nice. If any of you are here from the Evening Standard looking for more on the Brainiac fake experiments nonsense then click here (or, er, buy the Guardian): www.badscience.net/?cat=58 There&#8217;s lots of other quackbusting action on the site, listed by topic down the right hand side of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2006/07/brainiac-fake-experiments-scandal-make-it-to-the-evening-standard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Great Tamiflu Vaccine Scare</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/02/the-great-tamiflu-vaccine-scare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2006/02/the-great-tamiflu-vaccine-scare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 13:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evening standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mirror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scare stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telegraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Saturday February 18, 2006 The Guardian The interesting thing about the Tamiflu vaccine for bird flu that everybody keeps going on about, is this: it&#8217;s not a vaccine. The manufacturers even spell that out in their factsheet. It&#8217;s a drug, an antibiotic for viruses. But you wouldn&#8217;t know that if you read Paul [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2006/02/the-great-tamiflu-vaccine-scare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How many microbiologists does it take to change a tabloid story?</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/11/how-many-microbiologists-does-it-take-to-change-a-tabloid-story/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2005/11/how-many-microbiologists-does-it-take-to-change-a-tabloid-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 12:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evening standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PhDs, doctors, and qualifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scare stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[very basic science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Saturday November 19, 2005 The Guardian I realise this is starting to look like some kind of dirty protest, but here is a window on to how the media sees itself in relation to scientific expertise, and how it copes with criticism, which just happens &#8211; entirely by coincidence &#8211; to involve the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2005/11/how-many-microbiologists-does-it-take-to-change-a-tabloid-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

