<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bad Science &#187; express</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/category/media/papers-express/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Jabs &#8220;as bad as the cancer&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/10/jabs-as-bad-as-the-cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2009/10/jabs-as-bad-as-the-cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 23:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/10/jabs-as-bad-as-the-cancer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre, Saturday 10 October 2009, The Guardian Last month I had a debate at the Royal Institution with Lord Drayson, the Science Minister, in which he argued that I was too harsh on British science coverage, which is the best in the world. During this event our chairman (bizarrely and excellently Simon Mayo) pulled [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2009/10/jabs-as-bad-as-the-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drink coffee, see dead people.</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/01/drink-coffee-see-dead-people/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2009/01/drink-coffee-see-dead-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[badscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dodgy academic press releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presenting numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/01/drink-coffee-see-dead-people/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Guardian, Saturday January 17 2009 Ben Goldacre &#8220;Danger from just 7 cups of coffee a day&#8221; said the Express on Wednesday. &#8220;Too much coffee can make you hallucinate and sense dead people say sleep experts. The equivalent of just seven cups of instant coffee a day is enough to trigger the weird responses.&#8221; The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2009/01/drink-coffee-see-dead-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s not my fault I fall into repetitive self parody. You started it.</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/12/its-not-my-fault-i-fall-into-repetitive-self-parody-you-started-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/12/its-not-my-fault-i-fall-into-repetitive-self-parody-you-started-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mirror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telegraph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/12/its-not-my-fault-i-fall-into-repetitive-self-parody-you-started-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian Saturday December 6 2008 Writing this column only really scares me because I wonder whether everything else in the media is as shamelessly, venally, manipulatively, one-sidedly, selectively reported on as the things I know about. I&#8217;m not going to go on about MMR again. But this week the reality editing was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/12/its-not-my-fault-i-fall-into-repetitive-self-parody-you-started-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>181</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roger Coghill and the Aids test</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/06/roger-coghill-fails-the-aids-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/06/roger-coghill-fails-the-aids-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competing interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrosensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbal remedies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PhDs, doctors, and qualifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roger coghill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/06/roger-coghill-fails-the-aids-test/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian, Saturday June 28, 2008 It&#8217;s the big stories I enjoy the most. &#8220;Suicides linked to phone masts&#8221; roared the Sunday Express front-page headline this week. &#8220;The spate of deaths among young people in Britain&#8217;s suicide capital could be linked to radio waves from dozens of mobile phone transmitter masts near the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/06/roger-coghill-fails-the-aids-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Quantitative Analysis Of The Frequency With Which One Company Is Promoted, And  By Whom, In UK National Newspapers UPDATED 30/9/06</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/09/a-quantitative-analysis-of-the-frequency-with-which-one-company-is-promoted-and-by-whom-in-uk-national-newspapers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2006/09/a-quantitative-analysis-of-the-frequency-with-which-one-company-is-promoted-and-by-whom-in-uk-national-newspapers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telegraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A Quantitative Analysis Of The Frequency With Which One Company Is Promoted, And By Whom, In UK National Newspapers&#8221; Updated 16th September 2006. Dr Ben Goldacre (Corresponding Author) Bad Science Research Institute, www.badscience.net ben@badscience.net Introduction. Susan Clark is an alternative therapy columnist who recently made a cheeky attack on her critics. It was subsequently noted [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2006/09/a-quantitative-analysis-of-the-frequency-with-which-one-company-is-promoted-and-by-whom-in-uk-national-newspapers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Great Tamiflu Vaccine Scare</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/02/the-great-tamiflu-vaccine-scare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2006/02/the-great-tamiflu-vaccine-scare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 13:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evening standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mirror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scare stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telegraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Saturday February 18, 2006 The Guardian The interesting thing about the Tamiflu vaccine for bird flu that everybody keeps going on about, is this: it&#8217;s not a vaccine. The manufacturers even spell that out in their factsheet. It&#8217;s a drug, an antibiotic for viruses. But you wouldn&#8217;t know that if you read Paul [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2006/02/the-great-tamiflu-vaccine-scare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t dumb me down</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/09/dont-dumb-me-down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2005/09/dont-dumb-me-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 23:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash-for-"stories"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel five]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chocolate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dangers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gillian mckeith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[letters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mirror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PhDs, doctors, and qualifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[references]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scare stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telegraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[very basic science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weight loss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We laughed, we cried, we learned about statistics &#8230; Ben Goldacre on why writing Bad Science has increased his suspicion of the media by, ooh, a lot of per cents Ben Goldacre Thursday September 8, 2005 The Guardian OK, here&#8217;s something weird. Every week in Bad Science we either victimise some barking pseudoscientific quack, or [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2005/09/dont-dumb-me-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Risk of infection</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/05/risk-of-infection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2005/05/risk-of-infection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 14:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dangers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mirror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telegraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Thursday May 26, 2005 The Guardian Â· I&#8217;d like to open with a sanctimonious moment. I don&#8217;t expect anyone else in the world to follow suit, but from now on, if I refer to published academic research, I&#8217;ll be giving the full reference, at the foot of the column if there&#8217;s space, or [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2005/05/risk-of-infection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protect your boundaries with agate</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/04/protect-your-boundaries-with-agate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2005/04/protect-your-boundaries-with-agate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2005 14:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PhDs, doctors, and qualifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[very basic science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Thursday April 14, 2005 The Guardian Â· After years of hand-wringing about the decay of post-enlightenment rationalist values I&#8217;m beginning to wonder whether all is well, and the choice of alternative health guff in the Daily Express is deliberate parody. There is no other explanation for this week&#8217;s article entitled Embrace the power [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2005/04/protect-your-boundaries-with-agate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Atomic tomatoes are not the only fruit</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2004/12/atomic-tomatoes-are-not-the-only-fruit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2004/12/atomic-tomatoes-are-not-the-only-fruit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel five]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cosmetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gillian mckeith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbal remedies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[letters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxygen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PhDs, doctors, and qualifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[references]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telegraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[very basic science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article is a rough transcript of the most excellent Bad Science Awards 2004 that were held in the Asylum Club on Rathbone St W1, a tiny basement club with a fire safety license for 150. We were expecting 20 people but to general astonishment there were queues down the street, and an unruly crowd [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2004/12/atomic-tomatoes-are-not-the-only-fruit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snot a problem</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2004/07/snot-a-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2004/07/snot-a-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxygen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[very basic science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Thursday July 29, 2004 The Guardian Â· Mainstream science is, of course, not above reproach. We all know about the dangers of publication bias, where only positive findings get reported, and the negative ones get left in desk drawers; and, of course, sometimes cheeky souls quote papers selectively, to bolster their own agenda. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2004/07/snot-a-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bin the pills, eat your greens</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2004/05/bin-the-pills-eat-your-greens-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2004/05/bin-the-pills-eat-your-greens-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2004 04:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[references]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bin the pills, eat your greens Talk about Bad science here Ben Goldacre Thursday May 6, 2004 The Guardian Â· It&#8217;s a simple universe for nutritionists, with a small number of fundamental laws from which all other facts derive. Antioxidants are good; stimulants are bad; laboratory studies on rat metabolism are proof of the need [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2004/05/bin-the-pills-eat-your-greens-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bin the pills, eat your greens</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2004/05/bin-the-pills-eat-your-greens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2004/05/bin-the-pills-eat-your-greens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2004 04:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bin the pills, eat your greens Talk about Bad science here Ben Goldacre Thursday May 6, 2004 The Guardian Â· It&#8217;s a simple universe for nutritionists, with a small number of fundamental laws from which all other facts derive. Antioxidants are good; stimulants are bad; laboratory studies on rat metabolism are proof of the need [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2004/05/bin-the-pills-eat-your-greens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alternative medicine on the NHS?</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2004/02/alternative-medicine-on-the-nhs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2004/02/alternative-medicine-on-the-nhs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2004 03:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain gym]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penises]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alternative medicine on the NHS? Ben Goldacre Thursday February 12, 2004 The Guardian Â· Well, last week&#8217;s chemicals with rude names certainly tapped a rich seam. There are some species names that Carl Linnaeus would have been proud of. So, it&#8217;s hard to imagine the story behind how we ended up with a leiodid beetle [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2004/02/alternative-medicine-on-the-nhs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christmas presents to avoid</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2003/12/christmas-presents-to-avoid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2003/12/christmas-presents-to-avoid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2003 03:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christmas presents to avoid Ben Goldacre Thursday December 18, 2003 The Guardian Â· Our spies are everywhere and it seems last week&#8217;s ludicrous &#8220;salt crystal lamp&#8221; is also being sold, of all places, in the Science Museum gift catalogue. Call me a pedant if you will, but I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s entirely to the good [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2003/12/christmas-presents-to-avoid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It feels like crystal</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2003/12/it-feels-like-crystal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2003/12/it-feels-like-crystal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 03:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[references]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It feels like crystal Ben Goldacre Thursday December 11, 2003 The Guardian Â· As a Guardian-reading science bunny, there&#8217;s something slightly galling about the way that right-on beliefs so often seem to cluster together. For example, what&#8217;s the connection between torturing political dissidents and crystal magic? Over to the Amnesty Christmas catalogue, and its magnificent [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2003/12/it-feels-like-crystal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MMR &#8211; Never Mind the Facts</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2003/12/mmr-never-mind-the-facts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2003/12/mmr-never-mind-the-facts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 02:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel five]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telegraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article won the Â£2,000 ABSW Best Science Feature Award 2003 Channel Five&#8217;s new drama about the link between MMR and autism makes great TV. But it gets the story, and the science, disastrously wrong. How did we get to such a level of confusion and hysteria about this vaccine? Ben Goldacre unravels the real [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2003/12/mmr-never-mind-the-facts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swimming with sharks</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2003/10/swimming-with-sharks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2003/10/swimming-with-sharks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2003 03:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cosmetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Swimming with sharks Ben Goldacre Thursday October 30, 2003 The Guardian Talk bad science Â· Dolphins will save us all, according to the International Journal of Bad Science &#8211; sorry, I mean the Express. &#8220;Swimming with dolphins is increasingly recognised as a therapy for clinical depression, autism, and other neurological conditions,&#8221; it says, before regaling [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2003/10/swimming-with-sharks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can anal retention help you beat depression?</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2003/09/can-anal-retention-help-you-beat-depression/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2003/09/can-anal-retention-help-you-beat-depression/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2003 03:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbal remedies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new scientist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[references]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weight loss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can anal retention help you beat depression? Ben Goldacre Thursday September 18, 2003 The Guardian Talk bad science Â· You might wonder why I&#8217;m being so anally retentive about everything this week. I can only say in my defence that I&#8217;ve been doing my best to follow Hiroyuki Nishigaki&#8217;s excellent book: &#8220;How to Good-Bye Depression: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2003/09/can-anal-retention-help-you-beat-depression/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t throw away those drugs</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2003/08/dont-throw-away-those-drugs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2003/08/dont-throw-away-those-drugs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2003 03:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scare stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t throw away those drugs Ben Goldacre Thursday August 14, 2003 The Guardian Â· After the slightly overplayed HRT and breast cancer editorial in the Lancet, I was itching with delight at the prospect of another pill scare, especially in the week that MMR vaccination rates &#8211; the scientific illiterati&#8217;s last major public health victory [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2003/08/dont-throw-away-those-drugs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

