<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bad Science &#187; neurostuff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/category/neurostuff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What if academics were as dumb as quacks with statistics?</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2011/10/what-if-academics-were-as-dumb-as-quacks-with-statistics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2011/10/what-if-academics-were-as-dumb-as-quacks-with-statistics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 12:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurostuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=2405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre, The Guardian, Saturday 10th September 2011 We all like to laugh at quacks when they misuse basic statistics. But what if academics, en masse, deploy errors that are equally foolish? This week Sander Nieuwenhuis and colleagues publish a mighty torpedo in the journal Nature Neuroscience. They’ve identified one direct, stark statistical error that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2011/10/what-if-academics-were-as-dumb-as-quacks-with-statistics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washing the numbers, selling the model</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/01/washing-the-numbers-selling-the-model/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/01/washing-the-numbers-selling-the-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicalisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurostuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulating research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian, Saturday January 26 2008 If there&#8217;s one thing I love, it&#8217;s academics who take on the work of investigative journalism, because they are dogged. This has been a bad week for the SSRI antidepressants. First there&#8217;s the stuff you already know: bad data got buried. In a cracking new analysis of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/01/washing-the-numbers-selling-the-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This is your brain. This is your brain on politics. Any questions?</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/this-is-your-brain-this-is-your-brain-on-politics-any-questions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/this-is-your-brain-this-is-your-brain-on-politics-any-questions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 12:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash-for-"stories"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurostuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/this-is-your-brain-this-is-your-brain-on-politics-any-questions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian Saturday November 17 2007 Obviously we&#8217;re all interested in who the next US president is going to be, since it affects our risk of being blown up on the bus to work. According to the New York Times &#8211; which has covered this story at least three times &#8211; a commercial [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/this-is-your-brain-this-is-your-brain-on-politics-any-questions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

