<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bad Science &#187; oxygen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/category/oxygen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tessa&#8217;s Jowels</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/04/tessas-jowels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2006/04/tessas-jowels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 22:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxygen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, hereâ€™s the deal: weâ€™re talking about non-disgraced non-former minister Tessa Jowell, who has reportedly been paying large amounts of her hard-earned cash for â€œoxygen facialsâ€, and from the same celebrity beautician who does Paltrow and Moss. At some stage, just so that you know in advance, I intend to make a joke about Tessaâ€™s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2006/04/tessas-jowels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Up in the air</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/06/up-in-the-air/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2005/06/up-in-the-air/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxygen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[very basic science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Thursday June 16, 2005 The Guardian Â· Do you ever get the feeling that a story is just disappearing before your very eyes? There I was, cheerfully reading about the Opur Oxygen Canister that reader Diana McAllister sent me. Why would anyone want to inhale expensive oxygen from a tin that costs Â£10, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2005/06/up-in-the-air/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Atomic tomatoes are not the only fruit</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2004/12/atomic-tomatoes-are-not-the-only-fruit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2004/12/atomic-tomatoes-are-not-the-only-fruit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel five]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cosmetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gillian mckeith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbal remedies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[letters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxygen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PhDs, doctors, and qualifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[references]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telegraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[very basic science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article is a rough transcript of the most excellent Bad Science Awards 2004 that were held in the Asylum Club on Rathbone St W1, a tiny basement club with a fire safety license for 150. We were expecting 20 people but to general astonishment there were queues down the street, and an unruly crowd [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2004/12/atomic-tomatoes-are-not-the-only-fruit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snot a problem</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2004/07/snot-a-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2004/07/snot-a-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxygen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[very basic science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Thursday July 29, 2004 The Guardian Â· Mainstream science is, of course, not above reproach. We all know about the dangers of publication bias, where only positive findings get reported, and the negative ones get left in desk drawers; and, of course, sometimes cheeky souls quote papers selectively, to bolster their own agenda. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2004/07/snot-a-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Antibodies need some pollen, sometimes</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2004/03/antibodies-need-some-pollen-sometimes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2004/03/antibodies-need-some-pollen-sometimes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2004 03:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxygen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PhDs, doctors, and qualifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[very basic science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Antibodies need some pollen, sometimes Ben Goldacre Thursday March 18, 2004 The Guardian Talk bad science Â· The hits just keep on coming. Our noble bad science spotter Carl Brancher sends important news of PO2 Contour Cream from Laboratoires Herzog: it&#8217;s a &#8220;patented stabilisation of oxygen within a cream&#8221; that &#8220;puts oxygen back into the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2004/03/antibodies-need-some-pollen-sometimes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More than water?</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2004/01/more-than-water/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2004/01/more-than-water/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2004 03:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxygen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than water? Ben Goldacre Thursday January 22, 2004 The Guardian Â· What is it with pseudo scientists and water? After last week&#8217;s cluster nonsense, Caroline Stacey was getting excited in the Independent&#8217;s Food and Drink section about Oxygizer water. &#8220;Oxygizer doesn&#8217;t just slake a thirst, it provides the body with extra oxygen too. A [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2004/01/more-than-water/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The truth about oxygen</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2003/07/the-truth-about-oxygen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2003/07/the-truth-about-oxygen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2003 03:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxygen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The truth about oxygen Ben Goldacre Thursday July 17, 2003 The Guardian Talk bad science Â· There&#8217;s nothing more amusing than a battle for truth between competing schools of New Age bunkum. See how the Daily Mail gushed over the Elanra ioniser from Equilibra. It is, apparently, &#8220;the first ioniser that creates negative ions small [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2003/07/the-truth-about-oxygen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So what has ozone ever done for us?</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2003/06/so-what-has-ozone-ever-done-for-us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2003/06/so-what-has-ozone-ever-done-for-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2003 02:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxygen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scare stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Thursday June 26, 2003 The Guardian Â· What is it with alternative therapists and oxygen? Last week&#8217;s Time Out offered a glowing report on ozone therapy, and the fact that they called it O3 (with a superscript) should be enough to tell you that whoever wrote it wasn&#8217;t necessarily paying attention during basic [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2003/06/so-what-has-ozone-ever-done-for-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quack Tales</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2003/05/quack-tales/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2003/05/quack-tales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2003 02:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxygen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PhDs, doctors, and qualifications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quack tales Ben Goldacre Thursday May 29, 2003 The Guardian Talk about bad science I am delighted to be able to present you with the head of an American doctor, who has been struck off after the complementary therapies he was peddling turned out to be not just ineffective but downright dangerous. Dr James E [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2003/05/quack-tales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

