<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Bad Science &#187; new scientist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/category/papers-new-scientist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:10:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/8.8" -->
		<copyright>&#xA9;Ben Goldacre </copyright>
		<managingEditor>ben@badscience.net (Ben Goldacre)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>ben@badscience.net(Ben Goldacre)</webMaster>
		<category></category>
		<ttl>1440</ttl>
		<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Ben Goldacre\\\'s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Ben Goldacre</itunes:author>
		<itunes:category text="Science &amp; Medicine"/>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
		<itunes:owner>
			<itunes:name>Ben Goldacre</itunes:name>
			<itunes:email>ben@badscience.net</itunes:email>
		</itunes:owner>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:image href="http://www.badscience.net/wp-content/rubberduck2thumb2.JPG" />
		
		<item>
		<title>Artificial intransigence</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2004/06/artificial-intransigence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2004/06/artificial-intransigence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2004 15:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dangers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanniebots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new scientist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre
Thursday June 24, 2004
The Guardian
Â· You may remember Jim Wightman. He claimed to have written a piece of chat software that could pass itself off as a real child in a chatroom, and identify internet paedophiles by behaviour. To say this was thought highly dubious is an understatement &#8211; the software, if it existed, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2004/06/artificial-intransigence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nanniebots and Neverland</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2004/04/nanniebots-and-neverland/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2004/04/nanniebots-and-neverland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2004 03:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanniebots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new scientist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nanniebots and Neverland
Ben Goldacre
Thursday April 1, 2004
The Guardian
Talk about Bad Science here
Â· Right. Where were we? Ah yes, everyone was questioning the authenticity of Jim Wightman&#8217;s paedophile-entrapping artificial intelligence chat program Nanniebot, since it was more than 10 years ahead of all other artificial intelligence technology, and no one is allowed to see it in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2004/04/nanniebots-and-neverland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Nanniebots&#8217; to catch paedophiles</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2004/03/nanniebots-to-catch-paedophiles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2004/03/nanniebots-to-catch-paedophiles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 03:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanniebots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new scientist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8216;Nanniebots&#8217; to catch paedophiles
Ben Goldacre
Thursday March 25, 2004
The Guardian
Talk bad science
Â· As I sit here, quietly shedding the weight off my fat arse in my Dr Norbert Wurgler caffeine-impregnated SlimFit tights, I find myself bitterly regretting the title of the column. Ok. So here&#8217;s one I&#8217;m not sure of. Artificial intelligence is being used to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2004/03/nanniebots-to-catch-paedophiles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can anal retention help you beat depression?</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2003/09/can-anal-retention-help-you-beat-depression/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2003/09/can-anal-retention-help-you-beat-depression/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2003 03:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbal remedies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new scientist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[references]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weight loss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can anal retention help you beat depression?
Ben Goldacre
Thursday September 18, 2003
The Guardian
Talk bad science
Â· You might wonder why I&#8217;m being so anally retentive about everything this week. I can only say in my defence that I&#8217;ve been doing my best to follow Hiroyuki Nishigaki&#8217;s excellent book: &#8220;How to Good-Bye Depression: If You Constrict Anus 100 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2003/09/can-anal-retention-help-you-beat-depression/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
