<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bad Science &#187; penises</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/category/penises/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Funnel vision</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2005/07/funnel-vision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2005/07/funnel-vision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 13:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbal remedies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[references]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Thursday July 7, 2005 The Guardian Â· There I was two weeks ago, making sarcastic jokes about how Bad Science was just a cover for the [coughs] popular statistics lecture series I secretly yearned to give, and now I&#8217;m about to try to explain funnel plots to you, in a national newspaper, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2005/07/funnel-vision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Atomic tomatoes are not the only fruit</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2004/12/atomic-tomatoes-are-not-the-only-fruit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2004/12/atomic-tomatoes-are-not-the-only-fruit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel five]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cosmetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gillian mckeith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbal remedies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[letters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxygen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PhDs, doctors, and qualifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[references]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telegraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[very basic science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article is a rough transcript of the most excellent Bad Science Awards 2004 that were held in the Asylum Club on Rathbone St W1, a tiny basement club with a fire safety license for 150. We were expecting 20 people but to general astonishment there were queues down the street, and an unruly crowd [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2004/12/atomic-tomatoes-are-not-the-only-fruit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waxing sceptical</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2004/03/waxing-sceptical/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2004/03/waxing-sceptical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2004 03:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penises]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Waxing sceptical Ben Goldacre Thursday March 4, 2004 The Guardian Â· Time for some more home science experiments. Robin Sidgwick sends in the catalogue for Ragdale Hall health hydro, which includes the fabulously theatrical &#8220;ear candling&#8221;: the idea is that a hollow tube of wax invented by Hopi indians is inserted into your ear and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2004/03/waxing-sceptical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alternative medicine on the NHS?</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2004/02/alternative-medicine-on-the-nhs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2004/02/alternative-medicine-on-the-nhs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2004 03:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain gym]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penises]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alternative medicine on the NHS? Ben Goldacre Thursday February 12, 2004 The Guardian Â· Well, last week&#8217;s chemicals with rude names certainly tapped a rich seam. There are some species names that Carl Linnaeus would have been proud of. So, it&#8217;s hard to imagine the story behind how we ended up with a leiodid beetle [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2004/02/alternative-medicine-on-the-nhs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s in a name?</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2004/02/whats-in-a-name/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2004/02/whats-in-a-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2004 03:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penises]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#8217;s in a name? Ben Goldacre Thursday February 5, 2004 The Guardian Â· Proper scientists are getting on with the important business of broadening our vocabulary. Call me childish, again, but you might want to check out the unbelievably hardcore &#8220;molecules with silly or unusual names&#8221; website at the University of Bristol&#8217;s chemistry department (bris.ac.uk/Depts/Chemistry/MOTM/silly/sillymols.htm). [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2004/02/whats-in-a-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to increase your staying power</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2003/11/how-to-increase-your-staying-power/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2003/11/how-to-increase-your-staying-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2003 03:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[very basic science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How to increase your staying power Ben Goldacre Thursday November 20, 2003 The Guardian Talk bad science Â· I&#8217;d always assumed that bad science in contraception was limited to delirious ramblings from the Catholic church about the HIV virus being small enough to fit through the gaps between the latex molecules. But perhaps not. As [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2003/11/how-to-increase-your-staying-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

