<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bad Science &#187; powerwatch &#8211; alasdair philips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/category/powerwatch-alasdair-philips/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Buy your Powerwatch goodies today!</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/10/buy-your-powerwatch-goodies-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/10/buy-your-powerwatch-goodies-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[electrosensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powerwatch - alasdair philips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought I&#8217;d briefly share this email which just arrived. As you can see the Powerwatch/EMFields product range is expanding, and as they say, electromagnetic hypersensitivity has been officially recognised as a disability by the government. If you&#8217;re frightened about electromagnetic radiation you can pay £28 to subscribe to the Powerwatch website. You can read [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/10/buy-your-powerwatch-goodies-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Updated with lobby feedback &#8211; A thought experiment for the electrosensitivity lobby</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/a-thought-experiment-for-the-electrosensitivity-lobby/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/a-thought-experiment-for-the-electrosensitivity-lobby/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrosensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powerwatch - alasdair philips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The electrosensitivity lobby are famously selective about the evidence they quote. They simply ignore the large body of data finding that electrosensitivity symptoms are not worsened by e-m waves, and they selectively quote only data which supports their hypothesis, in a pattern which can be seen throughout the internet. I fear this may mislead their [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/a-thought-experiment-for-the-electrosensitivity-lobby/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And science said atom bombs were safe too&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/06/and-science-said-atom-bombs-were-safe-too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/06/and-science-said-atom-bombs-were-safe-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 15:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrosensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powerwatch - alasdair philips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m in a dash, but I thought you deserved these two brave rebuttals of the peripheral criticisms that the ubiquitous electromagnetic radiation scaremongers have received. Jasper Carrott of all people on BBC2 (funny how despite being such a massive source of electromagnetic radiation they still have such a thing about beating people up over the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/06/and-science-said-atom-bombs-were-safe-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Electrosensitives: the new cash cow of the woo industry</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/06/electrosensitives-the-new-cash-cow-of-the-woo-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/06/electrosensitives-the-new-cash-cow-of-the-woo-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 00:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrosensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick holford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powerwatch - alasdair philips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scare stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Saturday June 2, 2007 The Guardian The Independent has put its green columnist Julia Stephenson on to Panorama&#8217;s Wi-Fi scare story: a charming green party candidate and beef heiress living in Chelsea on a trust fund, who believes her symptoms of tiredness and headache are caused by electromagnetic radiation from phones and Wi-Fi. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/06/electrosensitives-the-new-cash-cow-of-the-woo-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>125</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wi-Fi Wants To Kill Your Children&#8230; But Alasdair Philips of Powerwatch sells the cure!</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/so-simple-a-child-could-spot-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/so-simple-a-child-could-spot-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 23:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrosensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powerwatch - alasdair philips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scare stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[very basic science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello visitors from boingboing/slashdot. I&#8217;m a doctor and I write in the Guardian and the BMJ about quackery, health scares, and pseudoscience in the media. Ben Goldacre Saturday May 26, 2007 The Guardian Won&#8217;t somebody, please, think of the children? Three weeks ago I received my favourite email of all time, from a science teacher. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/so-simple-a-child-could-spot-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>161</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Kenyon from BBC Panorama Responds on Wi-Fi Scare</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/paul-kenyon-from-panorama-responds-on-wi-fi-scare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/paul-kenyon-from-panorama-responds-on-wi-fi-scare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 19:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrosensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powerwatch - alasdair philips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scare stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve just been sent this by the BBC publicity office, it is a response from Paul Kenyon, the presenter of the show, and very nice chap too. He is talking about the posts here and here. And remember &#8211; by the miracle of the interweb &#8211; this is the show he is talking about. Hi [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/paul-kenyon-from-panorama-responds-on-wi-fi-scare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amusing Leaked Letter &#8211; BBC Panorama Wi-Fi &#8211; now updated with further response from BBC</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/leaked-letter-bbc-panorama-wi-fi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/leaked-letter-bbc-panorama-wi-fi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 16:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrosensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powerwatch - alasdair philips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This has fallen into my hands. It is &#8211; I am informed &#8211; the letter that the BBC complaints people are planning to send to people if they complain about the ludicrous Panorama Wi-Fi show from Monday, featuring Alasdair Philips and electromagnetic hypersensitivity. I thought it might amuse you to know that it has apparently [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/leaked-letter-bbc-panorama-wi-fi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBC Panorama on WiFi &#8211; Updated with response from Panorama presenter Paul Kenyon</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/bbc-panorama-on-wifi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/bbc-panorama-on-wifi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 23:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrosensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powerwatch - alasdair philips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have to skip through 2 minutes of Eastenders to get to it&#8230; . &#8220;Discuss&#8221;. I haven&#8217;t got time right now to go forensic on its ass right now, but there is a lot to be concerned about in this show. For example, the discussion on &#8220;electrohypersensitivity&#8221; rather neglected this kind of material: www.badscience.net/?p=239 And [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/bbc-panorama-on-wifi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I have nothing to declare but my cheekiness</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/05/i-have-nothing-to-declare-but-my-cheekiness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2006/05/i-have-nothing-to-declare-but-my-cheekiness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 01:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dangers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrosensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicalisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick holford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powerwatch - alasdair philips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scare stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[very basic science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Saturday May 20, 2006 The Guardian I am routinely accused, in long and angry letters, of being in the pay of the pharmaceutical industry, the mobile phone industry, and the government. Needless to say I lap it up, and would never engage in similarly ad hominem attacks in return, since critiques of character [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2006/05/i-have-nothing-to-declare-but-my-cheekiness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>120</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

