<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bad Science &#187; pr guff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/category/pr-guff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dodgy academic PR</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/05/dodgy-academic-pr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2009/05/dodgy-academic-pr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 04:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[academic pr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pr guff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/05/dodgy-academic-pr/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian Saturday 30 May 2009 Obviously we distrust the media on science: they rewrite commercial press releases from dodgy organisations as if they were health news, they lionise mavericks with poor evidence, and worse. But journalists will often say: what about those scientists with their press releases? Surely we should do something [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2009/05/dodgy-academic-pr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We&#8217;ve come across a sticky patch. We&#8217;re going to have to work through it, or get out and go our separate ways.</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/03/weve-come-across-a-sticky-patch-were-going-to-have-to-work-through-it-or-get-out-and-go-our-separate-ways/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2009/03/weve-come-across-a-sticky-patch-were-going-to-have-to-work-through-it-or-get-out-and-go-our-separate-ways/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 01:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pr guff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scienciness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/03/weve-come-across-a-sticky-patch-were-going-to-have-to-work-through-it-or-get-out-and-go-our-separate-ways/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian, Saturday 7 March 2009 A truly groundbreaking document has been leaked onto the internet. The claim is that this 27-page wonder represents a successful $1.5m pitch to make a slight modification to the Pepsi logo. Welcome to the science of PR. “By investing in our history and brand ethos we can [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2009/03/weve-come-across-a-sticky-patch-were-going-to-have-to-work-through-it-or-get-out-and-go-our-separate-ways/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mischief PR and more top secret data.</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/07/mischief-pr-and-more-top-secret-data/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/07/mischief-pr-and-more-top-secret-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 23:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pr guff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scare stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secret data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/07/mischief-pr-and-more-top-secret-data/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian Saturday July 5 2008 Anyone would think the cold war was still on, with all this top secret scientific data that journalists constantly seem to be writing about. In last week&#8217;s column, as you will remember, we saw the Sunday Express front page claiming that a scientist and government adviser called [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/07/mischief-pr-and-more-top-secret-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

