<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bad Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 17:55:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why is Imperial College permitting Westminster public school to sell an internship?</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2013/05/westminster-public-school-selling-cv-points-internship-at-imperial-college-grim/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2013/05/westminster-public-school-selling-cv-points-internship-at-imperial-college-grim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 13:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[just a blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=2926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is very odd indeed. Westminster, one of the most expensive public schools in the UK, is holding a fund-raising auction. In this auction, you can buy an internship at Imperial College&#8217;s Institute of Biomedical Engineering, on the promise that this will look great on your CV. auction.westminster.org.uk/lots/one-week-internship-at-the-institute-of-biomedical-engineering-imperial-college-london-for-a-level-students &#8220;On offer is a one week internship [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2013/05/westminster-public-school-selling-cv-points-internship-at-imperial-college-grim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shame on you, Sylvia Browne, for telling Amanda Berry&#8217;s mother her daughter was dead.</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2013/05/shame-on-you-sylvia-browne-for-telling-amanda-berrys-mother-her-daughter-was-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2013/05/shame-on-you-sylvia-browne-for-telling-amanda-berrys-mother-her-daughter-was-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 19:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[just a blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=2920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The story of Amanda Berry&#8217;s rescue in Cleveland &#8211; after ten years in captivity - is extraordinary. In 2004, popular psychic Sylvia Brown told Amanda&#8217;s mother that her little girl was dead. Here is a contemporaneous account of that show. www.wkyc.com/news/story.aspx?storyid=26501 Amanda Berry’s mother traveled to New York to tell her story to Psychic Sylvia Browne [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2013/05/shame-on-you-sylvia-browne-for-telling-amanda-berrys-mother-her-daughter-was-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My evidence to the Science and Tech Select Committee inquiry on missing trial data</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2013/04/my-evidence-to-the-uk-parliamentary-select-committee-inquiry-into-missing-trial-data/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2013/04/my-evidence-to-the-uk-parliamentary-select-committee-inquiry-into-missing-trial-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alltrials campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big pharma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=2895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The UK House of Commons Science and Technology Select Committee are currently looking at the problem of clinical trial results being withheld from doctors and patients (partly, the committee says, in response to Bad Pharma, which is heartening). A clear, thoughtful report and policy recommendations from this committee could be an important step towards fixing these [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2013/04/my-evidence-to-the-uk-parliamentary-select-committee-inquiry-into-missing-trial-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suicide advert from Hyundai is almost surreally misguided</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2013/04/suicide-advert-from-hyundai-is-almost-surreally-misguided/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2013/04/suicide-advert-from-hyundai-is-almost-surreally-misguided/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[small blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suicide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=2878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new advert from Hyundai features a depressed man attempting to commit suicide using the exhaust fumes from his car. The advert is on YouTube here, watch at your discretion. There is clear evidence that this kind of content increases the use of specific suicide methods, as I wrote in 2009: &#8230; it has been shown repeatedly that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2013/04/suicide-advert-from-hyundai-is-almost-surreally-misguided/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How vaccine scares respect local cultural boundaries.</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2013/04/how-vaccine-scares-respect-local-cultural-boundaries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2013/04/how-vaccine-scares-respect-local-cultural-boundaries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 22:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=2871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was on Newsnight this evening, discussing the measles outbreak in Swansea, and how we can get people vaccinated with MMR when they&#8217;ve previously refused. In my view: prevention is better than cure, it&#8217;s hard to reverse a scare story once the toothpaste is out of the tube, and we must innoculate ourselves against future [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2013/04/how-vaccine-scares-respect-local-cultural-boundaries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m on the One Show talking about missing trials tonight</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2013/03/im-on-the-one-show-talking-about-missing-trials-tonight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2013/03/im-on-the-one-show-talking-about-missing-trials-tonight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alltrials campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publication bias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=2855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I made a film for The One Show on BBC1, which goes out tonight. It&#8217;s about &#8220;publication bias&#8220;: the problem of clinical trial results being withheld from doctors and patients. (I also get to go into an awesome underground bunker where documents are stored&#8230;). You can watch it here: www.bbc.co.uk/i/b01rfr0r/?t=1m42s There is currently a Science [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2013/03/im-on-the-one-show-talking-about-missing-trials-tonight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teachers! What would evidence based practice look like?</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2013/03/heres-my-paper-on-evidence-and-teaching-for-the-education-minister/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2013/03/heres-my-paper-on-evidence-and-teaching-for-the-education-minister/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[evidence based policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=2849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was asked by Michael Gove (Secretary of State for Education) and the Department for Education to look at how to improve the use of evidence in schools. I think there are huge, positive opportunities for teachers here, that go way beyond just doing a few more trials: there is a need for a coherent [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2013/03/heres-my-paper-on-evidence-and-teaching-for-the-education-minister/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>80 patient groups (eighty!) sign up to alltrials.net in one go! Then Cancer Research UK!</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2013/02/80-patient-groups-eighty-sign-up-to-alltrials-net-in-one-go-then-cancer-research-uk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2013/02/80-patient-groups-eighty-sign-up-to-alltrials-net-in-one-go-then-cancer-research-uk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alltrials campaign]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=2829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We rely on clinical trials in medicine, but companies and researchers are able to withhold results wherever it suits them: this breaks evidence based medicine. The best available systematic review evidence estimates that around half of all trials for the treatments we use today have not been published: you can read the details on this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2013/02/80-patient-groups-eighty-sign-up-to-alltrials-net-in-one-go-then-cancer-research-uk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This is excellent, and amazing. GSK have just signed up to alltrials.net</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2013/02/this-is-excellent-and-amazing-gsk-have-just-signed-up-to-alltrials-net/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2013/02/this-is-excellent-and-amazing-gsk-have-just-signed-up-to-alltrials-net/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alltrials campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=2816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GSK have just this minute announced that they are signing up to the alltrials.net campaign. This will be written in a hurry. Briefly: the results of clinical trials have been routinely withheld from doctors and patients throughout medicine, and this problem has not been fixed. The www.alltrials.net campaign is asking for all trials to be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2013/02/this-is-excellent-and-amazing-gsk-have-just-signed-up-to-alltrials-net/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EU lead on clinical trials comes out in favour of transparency. Hurrah!</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2013/02/labours-eu-lead-on-clinical-trials-leads-transparency-drive-hurrah/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2013/02/labours-eu-lead-on-clinical-trials-leads-transparency-drive-hurrah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 15:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alltrials campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publication bias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=2812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a new EU Clinical Trials Regulation currently passing through parliament in Brussels. It is currently in draft form, and riddled with holes: essentially it allows companies and researchers to withhold trial results, and play fast and loose with analyses. These problems are best documented in the BMJ by one of the co-founders of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2013/02/labours-eu-lead-on-clinical-trials-leads-transparency-drive-hurrah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some talks in the US and Canada. COME!</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2013/01/some-talks-in-the-us-and-canada-come/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2013/01/some-talks-in-the-us-and-canada-come/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 19:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=2787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bad Pharma is out in the US and Canada on 5th Feb, which is extremely good news (sorry about the delay, floods and hurricanes apparently..). I&#8217;ll be doing a few public lectures in various places, alongside media stuff and other things, there&#8217;s a list of open ones below. If you&#8217;re a US podcaster or blogger [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2013/01/some-talks-in-the-us-and-canada-come/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AllTrials campaign launches, please sign and spread!</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2013/01/alltrials-campaign-launches-please-sign-and-spread/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2013/01/alltrials-campaign-launches-please-sign-and-spread/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alltrials campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publication bias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=2772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am very pleased to announce the launch of a prominent campaign for access to all trial results, which we have launched this week at www.alltrials.net, with myself, Sense About Science, Sir Iain Chalmers from the James Lind Initiative (previously co-founder of Cochrane), Dr Fiona Godlee (Editor in Chief of the BMJ), and Dr Carl [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2013/01/alltrials-campaign-launches-please-sign-and-spread/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health Select Committee call on NICE, GMC, pharma industry to address missing data</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2013/01/health-select-committee-call-on-nice-gmc-pharma-industry-to-address-missing-data/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2013/01/health-select-committee-call-on-nice-gmc-pharma-industry-to-address-missing-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=2770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent to see the UK House Of Commons Health Select Committee making such a clear statement about the ongoing problem of missing trial results, which the ABPI have laughably claimed is &#8220;historic&#8220;. They call upon NICE, the GMC and the pharmaceutical industry to address the problem, and they also take a very strong clear position: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2013/01/health-select-committee-call-on-nice-gmc-pharma-industry-to-address-missing-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I made this Radio 4 documentary on randomised trials on government policy</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2013/01/i-made-this-radio-4-documentary-on-randomised-trials-on-government-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2013/01/i-made-this-radio-4-documentary-on-randomised-trials-on-government-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 20:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence based policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=2763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a documentary I made for BBC Radio 4 (with producer Rami Tzabar) about evidence based social policy, and why we should do more randomised trials in government. It&#8217;s good fun, 40 minutes, with contributions from Dean Karlan (who wrote this book and is behind all these excellent trials on reducing poverty), Prof Sheila Bird, Jonathan Portes [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2013/01/i-made-this-radio-4-documentary-on-randomised-trials-on-government-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interview on missing trials with the Institute for Clinical Research</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2012/12/interview-on-missing-trials-with-the-institute-for-clinical-research/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2012/12/interview-on-missing-trials-with-the-institute-for-clinical-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 19:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=2758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just catching up on posting some overdue entries, I&#8217;ll do a roundup of progress on the hidden trial data problem in a while. Firstly, briefly, here&#8217;s an interview I did with the members&#8217; journal of the Institute for Clinical Research (the people who design and run clinical trials). It&#8217;s a good, constructive discussion, mostly covering [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2012/12/interview-on-missing-trials-with-the-institute-for-clinical-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MPs write to Public Accounts Committee to request action on hidden trials and Tamiflu.</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2012/12/mps-write-to-public-accounts-committee-to-request-action-on-hidden-trials-and-tamiflu/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2012/12/mps-write-to-public-accounts-committee-to-request-action-on-hidden-trials-and-tamiflu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ABPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alltrials campaign]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=2742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The letter below has been sent to Margaret Hodge, Chair of the Public Accounts Committee, asking her to take action on the ongoing problem of hidden trials, and specifically Tamiflu. The very notion that we spent £500 million on Tamiflu &#8211; with information about over half of the clinical trials still being withheld &#8211; is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2012/12/mps-write-to-public-accounts-committee-to-request-action-on-hidden-trials-and-tamiflu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>False claims by Stephen Whitehead and Deepak Khanna of the ABPI</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2012/12/dreary-false-claims-by-stephen-whitehead-and-deepak-khanna-of-the-abpi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2012/12/dreary-false-claims-by-stephen-whitehead-and-deepak-khanna-of-the-abpi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ABPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Whitehead]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=2737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Briefly: the ABPI have engaged in an energetic personal smear campaign, as predicted at the end of Bad Pharma. I&#8217;ll think about posting the details from leaked and external ABPI documents at some stage. I&#8217;m posting some correspondence today because the CEO and President of the ABPI have both falsely claimed to MPs and journalists that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2012/12/dreary-false-claims-by-stephen-whitehead-and-deepak-khanna-of-the-abpi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Win. Parliamentary Sci Tech Committee announces official inquiry into missing trial data.</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2012/12/win-parliamentary-sci-tech-committee-announces-official-inquiry-into-missing-trial-data/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2012/12/win-parliamentary-sci-tech-committee-announces-official-inquiry-into-missing-trial-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=2729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry to have been absent, I&#8217;ve been working away on several projects behind the scenes, on which much (much!) more shortly. I&#8217;m extremely pleased to say that the Commons Science and Technology Select Committee have just announced that they will now conduct a formal inquiry into missing trial data. Full details are posted below, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2012/12/win-parliamentary-sci-tech-committee-announces-official-inquiry-into-missing-trial-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Questions in Parliament, and a briefing note on missing trials: updated.</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2012/10/questions-in-parliament-and-a-briefing-note-on-missing-trials/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2012/10/questions-in-parliament-and-a-briefing-note-on-missing-trials/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[big pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hiding data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publication bias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=2714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning at 11:30, Dr Sarah Wollaston MP will ask questions in parliament about the ongoing scandal of missing trial data. This is widely recognised as a problem by academics and doctors, but governments, regulators, and journalists have neglected the problem, while industry simply denies it. Watch the questions live here or watch it later here. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2012/10/questions-in-parliament-and-a-briefing-note-on-missing-trials/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great article in Trials, on why regulators should stop withholding trial info from doctors and patients</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2012/10/great-article-in-trials-on-why-regulators-should-stop-withholding-trial-info-from-doctors-and-patients/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2012/10/great-article-in-trials-on-why-regulators-should-stop-withholding-trial-info-from-doctors-and-patients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big pharma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=2704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One thing in Bad Pharma has shocked readers more than anything else: the way that vitally important information about trials is withheld from doctors and patients, not just by drug companies, but also by government bodies such NICE and the European Medicines Agency (the body that approves and regulates medicines for the UK). As we [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2012/10/great-article-in-trials-on-why-regulators-should-stop-withholding-trial-info-from-doctors-and-patients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
