<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bad Science &#187; Search Results  &#187;  Holford</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/search/Holford/feed/rss2/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fish oil in the Observer: the return of a $2bn friend</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2010/06/the-return-of-a-2bn-fishy-friend/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2010/06/the-return-of-a-2bn-fishy-friend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 23:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fish oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=1675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre, The Guardian, Saturday 5 June 2010 &#8220;Fish oil helps schoolchildren to concentrate” was the headline in the Observer. Regular readers will remember the omega-3 fish oil pill issue, as the entire British news media has been claiming for several years now that there are trials showing it improves school performance and behaviour in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2010/06/the-return-of-a-2bn-fishy-friend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;We are more possible than you can powerfully imagine&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/07/we-are-more-possible-than-you-can-powerfully-imagine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2009/07/we-are-more-possible-than-you-can-powerfully-imagine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal chill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=1272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian Wednesday 29 July 2009 Today the Australian magazine Cosmos, along with a vast number of other blogs and publications, reprinted an article by Simon Singh, in slightly tweaked form, in an act of solidarity. The British Chiropractic Association has been suing Singh personally for the past 15 months, over a piece [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2009/07/we-are-more-possible-than-you-can-powerfully-imagine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matthias Rath &#8211; steal this chapter</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/04/matthias-rath-steal-this-chapter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2009/04/matthias-rath-steal-this-chapter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BANT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matthias rath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/04/matthias-rath-steal-this-chapter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the &#8220;missing chapter&#8221; about vitamin pill salesman Matthias Rath. Sadly I was unable to write about him at the time that book was initially published, as he was suing my ass in the High Court. The chapter is now available in the new paperback edition, and I&#8217;ve posted it here for free so [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2009/04/matthias-rath-steal-this-chapter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>126</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LBC, MMR, Jeni Barnett, an Early Day Motion, the Times, and, er, a bit of Stephen Fry&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/lbc-mmr-jeni-barnett-an-early-day-motion-the-times-and-er-a-bit-of-stephen-fry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/lbc-mmr-jeni-barnett-an-early-day-motion-the-times-and-er-a-bit-of-stephen-fry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dangers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeni barnett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal chill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulating media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scare stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stifling criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/lbc-mmr-jeni-barnett-an-early-day-motion-the-times-and-er-a-bit-of-stephen-fry/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought since a few days have passed that I should let you know what&#8217;s happening with the slightly ridiculous LBC situation. If you skip to the bottom you will find a discussion on some mischievous activism which I think has great potential. Since LBC unwisely threw their legal weight around to prevent you from [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/lbc-mmr-jeni-barnett-an-early-day-motion-the-times-and-er-a-bit-of-stephen-fry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>154</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Er, &#8220;help&#8221;. Legal Chill from LBC 97.3 and &#8220;Global Radio&#8221; over Jeni Barnett&#8217;s MMR scaremongering</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/legal-chill-from-lbc-973-over-jeni-barnetts-mmr-scaremongering/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/legal-chill-from-lbc-973-over-jeni-barnetts-mmr-scaremongering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeni barnett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal chill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stifling criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/legal-chill-from-lbc-973-over-jeni-barnetts-mmr-scaremongering/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Update: recent developments are now available here, including an EDM in parliament and discussion in mainstream media] [Update: links to transcripts and audio hosted elsewhere at bottom of post] One more thing, since Stephen Fry excellently tweeted this post to his 8 billion followers (weirdly he wakes me up every morning) I&#8217;ve had to activate [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/legal-chill-from-lbc-973-over-jeni-barnetts-mmr-scaremongering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>234</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hot foul air</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/11/hot-foul-air/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/11/hot-foul-air/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 07:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mondo academico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PhDs, doctors, and qualifications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/11/hot-foul-air/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian Saturday 1st November 2008 Guy Ritchie has cancelled Madonna&#8217;s order for tens of thousands of pounds worth of special Kabbalah water to fill their swimming pool. It&#8217;s always uncomfortable when we have to humour someone close to us in the name of avoiding conflict. Right now in Thames Valley University, for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/11/hot-foul-air/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad Science teaching resources for schools</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/bad-science-teaching-resources-for-schools/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/bad-science-teaching-resources-for-schools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[teaching resources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/bad-science-teaching-resources-for-schools/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of years ago I made a bunch of school resources for teachers with the organisation NESTA and a group of teachers. Since I mentioned them in the book a couple of people have asked for them, so here they are: archive.planet-science.com/text_only/sciteach/badscience/index.html I think they&#8217;re good fun, and informative, but there aren&#8217;t enough of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/bad-science-teaching-resources-for-schools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Generous review of my book in the Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/generous-review-of-my-book-in-the-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/generous-review-of-my-book-in-the-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 22:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telegraph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/generous-review-of-my-book-in-the-daily-telegraph/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a very nice review of my book &#8220;Bad Science&#8221; in the Telegraph this week. I have to say I&#8217;m delighted to see that the two newspapers I&#8217;ve probably been meanest about over recent years are the two that have reviewed it so far. This betrays a genuinely wholesome grown up approach to life which [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/generous-review-of-my-book-in-the-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matthias Rath drops his million pound legal case against me and the Guardian.</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/matthias-rath-pulls-out-forced-to-pay-the-guardians-costs-i-think-this-means-i-win/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/matthias-rath-pulls-out-forced-to-pay-the-guardians-costs-i-think-this-means-i-win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matthias rath]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/matthias-rath-pulls-out-forced-to-pay-the-guardians-costs-i-think-this-means-i-win/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s just been publicly announced that the vitamin pill magnate Matthias Rath has pulled out of his gruelling legal case against me and the Guardian. He bought full page adverts denouncing Aids drugs while promoting his vitamin pills in South Africa, a country where hundreds of thousands die every year from Aids under an HIV [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/matthias-rath-pulls-out-forced-to-pay-the-guardians-costs-i-think-this-means-i-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>123</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ohh look I&#8217;m on the One Show on BBC One</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/ohh-look-im-on-the-one-show-on-bbc-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/ohh-look-im-on-the-one-show-on-bbc-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onanism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/ohh-look-im-on-the-one-show-on-bbc-one/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slightly tiggerish and lacking in gravitas but that&#8217;s roughly what you&#8217;d expect from a 12 year old delivering a 100,000 word thesis on mainstream television in 3 minutes. www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00dcy6n/ It starts 8 minutes in. As you can see the presenters really engaged with the film, they loved the book, and it triggered a thought-provoking discussion [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/ohh-look-im-on-the-one-show-on-bbc-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Charities Commission think blogs have no educational value</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/06/the-charities-commission-think-blogs-have-no-educational-value/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/06/the-charities-commission-think-blogs-have-no-educational-value/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/06/the-charities-commission-think-blogs-have-no-educational-value/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rant. Podnosh has unearthed a true gem: in a document called Public Benefit and the Advancement of Education, the Charities Commission are puzzling over whether educational institutions like posh schools can count as charities. There are two main aspects to educative merit or value: • is the subject capable of being of educative value; and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/06/the-charities-commission-think-blogs-have-no-educational-value/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogs vs mainstream media</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/blogs-vs-mainstream-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/blogs-vs-mainstream-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 01:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian, Saturday May 31 2008 You will remember last week we were talking about the £2,000 Dore &#8220;miracle cure&#8221; for dyslexia, invented by paint entrepreneur Wynford Dore. It had been pushed unrelentingly in the media, despite multiple Ofcom and ITC judgements, and through personal endorsement by Kenny Logan, who, it turned out, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/blogs-vs-mainstream-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dore &#8211; the media&#8217;s miracle cure for dyslexia</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/dore-the-medias-miracle-cure-for-dyslexia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/dore-the-medias-miracle-cure-for-dyslexia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 00:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miracles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do you judge if an intervention is effective when you hear about it in the media? Perhaps you tot up the balance of opinions. Perhaps you do it unconsciously. You might have noticed the Dore &#8220;miracle cure&#8221; for dyslexia, invented by millionaire paint entrepreneur Wynford Dore. It&#8217;s hard to ignore. In fact just recently [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/05/dore-the-medias-miracle-cure-for-dyslexia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Manufacturing Doubt&#8221;: Sir Cliff Richard weighs in on the Cochrane review.</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/04/cliff-richard-gloria-hunniford-carole-caplin-the-60bn-food-supplement-industry-and-the-quantum-xrroid-dude-refute-a-cochrane-meta-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/04/cliff-richard-gloria-hunniford-carole-caplin-the-60bn-food-supplement-industry-and-the-quantum-xrroid-dude-refute-a-cochrane-meta-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturing doubt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[references]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian, Saturday April 26 2008 And so our ongoing project to learn about evidence through nonsense enters its sixth improbable year. This week, the assembled celebrity community and vitamin pill industry will walk us through the pitfalls of reading through a systematic review and meta-analysis from the Cochrane Collaboration, an international not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/04/cliff-richard-gloria-hunniford-carole-caplin-the-60bn-food-supplement-industry-and-the-quantum-xrroid-dude-refute-a-cochrane-meta-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My unfashionable views on regulating nonsense</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/04/my-unfashionable-views-on-regulating-nonsense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/04/my-unfashionable-views-on-regulating-nonsense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 00:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychic nonsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulating nonsense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian, Saturday April 19 2008 Paranormal phenomena are on the rise this spring, as any viewer of Street Psychic, Most Haunted Live, The Psychic Detective, Psychic Investigators, Mystic Challenge, and Psychic School would know. In Durham, Easington district council has paid for psychic Suzanne Hadwin to exorcise a poltergeist from the home [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/04/my-unfashionable-views-on-regulating-nonsense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The trial that never was.</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/03/ding-dong-the-fish-is-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/03/ding-dong-the-fish-is-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equazen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fish oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian, Saturday March 29 2008 And so an epic saga comes to a close. You will remember the Durham Fish Oil tale &#8211; don&#8217;t switch off now, the punchline&#8217;s funny. The county council said it was doing a &#8220;trial&#8221; of fish oil pills in children, but the trial was designed so that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/03/ding-dong-the-fish-is-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Radio 4 The Rise of the Lifestyle Nutritionists</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/03/radio-4-the-rise-of-the-lifestyle-nutritionists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/03/radio-4-the-rise-of-the-lifestyle-nutritionists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 04:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history of quackery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, very excitingly &#8211; to me &#8211; the first half of my two-parter on Radio 4 went out over the airwaves last night. You can listen to it here: Part 2 is here. It&#8217;s Radio 4&#8242;s &#8220;Choice of the Day&#8221; for Monday, and Phil Daoust made it pick of the day. www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/mar/24/radio.tvandradioarts1 &#8220;Food is now [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/03/radio-4-the-rise-of-the-lifestyle-nutritionists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.badscience.net/wp-content/uploads/LifestyleNutritionists_PartOne.mp3" length="41729172" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pep, zing, oomph, ker-ching. CoQ10.</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/03/pep-zing-oomph-ker-ching/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/03/pep-zing-oomph-ker-ching/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 02:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicalisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian, Saturday March 15 2008 Doctors love pills: so do the public, and the media, and of course so do pill companies. When one pill dies, another must take its place. Are you feeling tired? Demotivated? I bet you are. But there is a solution &#8211; a pill &#8211; pushed by no [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/03/pep-zing-oomph-ker-ching/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washing the numbers, selling the model</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/01/washing-the-numbers-selling-the-model/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/01/washing-the-numbers-selling-the-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicalisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurostuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulating research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian, Saturday January 26 2008 If there&#8217;s one thing I love, it&#8217;s academics who take on the work of investigative journalism, because they are dogged. This has been a bad week for the SSRI antidepressants. First there&#8217;s the stuff you already know: bad data got buried. In a cracking new analysis of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/01/washing-the-numbers-selling-the-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aids Quackery International Tour</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/12/aids-quackery-international-tour/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/12/aids-quackery-international-tour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 00:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbal remedies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2007/12/aids-quackery-international-tour/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian Saturday December 1 2007 If you were going to be actuarial about media coverage &#8211; an eighth of a column inch for each premature death perhaps &#8211; then this paper would be filled with diarrhoea and Aids. Today is World Aids Day: so come with me on a world tour of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/12/aids-quackery-international-tour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>106</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

