<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bad Science &#187; Search Results  &#187;  Patrick+Holford</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/search/Patrick+Holford/feed/rss2/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Matthias Rath &#8211; steal this chapter</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/04/matthias-rath-steal-this-chapter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2009/04/matthias-rath-steal-this-chapter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BANT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matthias rath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/04/matthias-rath-steal-this-chapter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the &#8220;missing chapter&#8221; about vitamin pill salesman Matthias Rath. Sadly I was unable to write about him at the time that book was initially published, as he was suing my ass in the High Court. The chapter is now available in the new paperback edition, and I&#8217;ve posted it here for free so [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2009/04/matthias-rath-steal-this-chapter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>126</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hot foul air</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/11/hot-foul-air/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/11/hot-foul-air/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 07:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mondo academico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PhDs, doctors, and qualifications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/11/hot-foul-air/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian Saturday 1st November 2008 Guy Ritchie has cancelled Madonna&#8217;s order for tens of thousands of pounds worth of special Kabbalah water to fill their swimming pool. It&#8217;s always uncomfortable when we have to humour someone close to us in the name of avoiding conflict. Right now in Thames Valley University, for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/11/hot-foul-air/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad Science teaching resources for schools</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/bad-science-teaching-resources-for-schools/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/bad-science-teaching-resources-for-schools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[teaching resources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/bad-science-teaching-resources-for-schools/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of years ago I made a bunch of school resources for teachers with the organisation NESTA and a group of teachers. Since I mentioned them in the book a couple of people have asked for them, so here they are: archive.planet-science.com/text_only/sciteach/badscience/index.html I think they&#8217;re good fun, and informative, but there aren&#8217;t enough of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/bad-science-teaching-resources-for-schools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Generous review of my book in the Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/generous-review-of-my-book-in-the-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/generous-review-of-my-book-in-the-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 22:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telegraph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/generous-review-of-my-book-in-the-daily-telegraph/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a very nice review of my book &#8220;Bad Science&#8221; in the Telegraph this week. I have to say I&#8217;m delighted to see that the two newspapers I&#8217;ve probably been meanest about over recent years are the two that have reviewed it so far. This betrays a genuinely wholesome grown up approach to life which [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/10/generous-review-of-my-book-in-the-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matthias Rath drops his million pound legal case against me and the Guardian.</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/matthias-rath-pulls-out-forced-to-pay-the-guardians-costs-i-think-this-means-i-win/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/matthias-rath-pulls-out-forced-to-pay-the-guardians-costs-i-think-this-means-i-win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matthias rath]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/matthias-rath-pulls-out-forced-to-pay-the-guardians-costs-i-think-this-means-i-win/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s just been publicly announced that the vitamin pill magnate Matthias Rath has pulled out of his gruelling legal case against me and the Guardian. He bought full page adverts denouncing Aids drugs while promoting his vitamin pills in South Africa, a country where hundreds of thousands die every year from Aids under an HIV [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/matthias-rath-pulls-out-forced-to-pay-the-guardians-costs-i-think-this-means-i-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>123</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Charities Commission think blogs have no educational value</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/06/the-charities-commission-think-blogs-have-no-educational-value/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/06/the-charities-commission-think-blogs-have-no-educational-value/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/06/the-charities-commission-think-blogs-have-no-educational-value/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rant. Podnosh has unearthed a true gem: in a document called Public Benefit and the Advancement of Education, the Charities Commission are puzzling over whether educational institutions like posh schools can count as charities. There are two main aspects to educative merit or value: • is the subject capable of being of educative value; and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/06/the-charities-commission-think-blogs-have-no-educational-value/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Manufacturing Doubt&#8221;: Sir Cliff Richard weighs in on the Cochrane review.</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/04/cliff-richard-gloria-hunniford-carole-caplin-the-60bn-food-supplement-industry-and-the-quantum-xrroid-dude-refute-a-cochrane-meta-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/04/cliff-richard-gloria-hunniford-carole-caplin-the-60bn-food-supplement-industry-and-the-quantum-xrroid-dude-refute-a-cochrane-meta-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturing doubt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[references]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian, Saturday April 26 2008 And so our ongoing project to learn about evidence through nonsense enters its sixth improbable year. This week, the assembled celebrity community and vitamin pill industry will walk us through the pitfalls of reading through a systematic review and meta-analysis from the Cochrane Collaboration, an international not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/04/cliff-richard-gloria-hunniford-carole-caplin-the-60bn-food-supplement-industry-and-the-quantum-xrroid-dude-refute-a-cochrane-meta-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Radio 4 The Rise of the Lifestyle Nutritionists</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/03/radio-4-the-rise-of-the-lifestyle-nutritionists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/03/radio-4-the-rise-of-the-lifestyle-nutritionists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 04:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history of quackery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, very excitingly &#8211; to me &#8211; the first half of my two-parter on Radio 4 went out over the airwaves last night. You can listen to it here: Part 2 is here. It&#8217;s Radio 4&#8242;s &#8220;Choice of the Day&#8221; for Monday, and Phil Daoust made it pick of the day. www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/mar/24/radio.tvandradioarts1 &#8220;Food is now [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/03/radio-4-the-rise-of-the-lifestyle-nutritionists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.badscience.net/wp-content/uploads/LifestyleNutritionists_PartOne.mp3" length="41729172" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aids Quackery International Tour</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/12/aids-quackery-international-tour/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/12/aids-quackery-international-tour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 00:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbal remedies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2007/12/aids-quackery-international-tour/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian Saturday December 1 2007 If you were going to be actuarial about media coverage &#8211; an eighth of a column inch for each premature death perhaps &#8211; then this paper would be filled with diarrhoea and Aids. Today is World Aids Day: so come with me on a world tour of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/12/aids-quackery-international-tour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>106</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patrick Holford&#8217;s untruthful and unsubstantiated claims about pills</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/patrick-holford-unsubstantiated-untruthful/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/patrick-holford-unsubstantiated-untruthful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competing interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicalisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick holford]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, you lot are seriously on a roll. Following a complaint from a badscience reader, the ASA have found that Patrick Holford made untruthful, unsubstantiated claims in a leaflet he was sending out. Pasted below is the full adjudication and also the original advert in question, so that you can decide for yourself about the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/09/patrick-holford-unsubstantiated-untruthful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A startling lack of critical self-appraisal</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/a-lack-of-critical-self-appraisal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/a-lack-of-critical-self-appraisal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[craig sams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stifling criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One for the small print maybe, but I think this is culturally quite interesting, because to me it tells a small part of the story on how you can maintain a belief system by avoiding appraisal of your ideas. As you will remember, Craig Sams, a confectionery millionaire, recently wrote an article which I suppose [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/a-lack-of-critical-self-appraisal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Electrosensitives: the new cash cow of the woo industry</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/06/electrosensitives-the-new-cash-cow-of-the-woo-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/06/electrosensitives-the-new-cash-cow-of-the-woo-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 00:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrosensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick holford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powerwatch - alasdair philips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scare stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Saturday June 2, 2007 The Guardian The Independent has put its green columnist Julia Stephenson on to Panorama&#8217;s Wi-Fi scare story: a charming green party candidate and beef heiress living in Chelsea on a trust fund, who believes her symptoms of tiredness and headache are caused by electromagnetic radiation from phones and Wi-Fi. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/06/electrosensitives-the-new-cash-cow-of-the-woo-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>125</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBC Panorama on WiFi &#8211; Updated with response from Panorama presenter Paul Kenyon</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/bbc-panorama-on-wifi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/bbc-panorama-on-wifi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 23:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrosensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powerwatch - alasdair philips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have to skip through 2 minutes of Eastenders to get to it&#8230; . &#8220;Discuss&#8221;. I haven&#8217;t got time right now to go forensic on its ass right now, but there is a lot to be concerned about in this show. For example, the discussion on &#8220;electrohypersensitivity&#8221; rather neglected this kind of material: www.badscience.net/?p=239 And [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/bbc-panorama-on-wifi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Amazing Qlink Science Pedant</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/the-amazing-qlink-science-pedant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/the-amazing-qlink-science-pedant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 02:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrosensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick holford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qlink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Saturday May 19, 2007 The Guardian Normally I&#8217;d ignore quack medical devices, but when the catalogue from Health Products For Life &#8211; run by vitamin pill salesman Patrick Holford &#8211; arrived, I found an unexpected treat waiting for me. Among his usual &#8220;special formulation&#8221; pill-peddling banter, there was the QLink pendant, at just [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/the-amazing-qlink-science-pedant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patrick Holford &#8211; &#8220;Food Is Better Than Medicine&#8221; South Africa Tour Blighted By HIV Claim</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/02/patrick-holford-food-is-better-than-medicine-south-africa-tour/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/02/patrick-holford-food-is-better-than-medicine-south-africa-tour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matthias rath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick holford]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a bit of a data dump of some of the critical news coverage that Patrick Holford&#8217;s &#8220;Food Is Better Than Medicine&#8221; tour of South Africa has picked up. They&#8217;re not very impressed in Africa by his claim that vitamin C is better than AZT, and Holford seems a bit conflicted over it himself. Here&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/02/patrick-holford-food-is-better-than-medicine-south-africa-tour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enough. Patrick. Holford.</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/02/money-is-not-the-only-barrier-to-aids-patients-getting-hold-of-drugs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/02/money-is-not-the-only-barrier-to-aids-patients-getting-hold-of-drugs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 00:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matthias rath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick holford]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2007/02/money-is-not-the-only-barrier-to-aids-patients-getting-hold-of-drugs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Saturday February 17, 2007 The Guardian Look, I realise this is beginning to feel like one of those big containers where the Americans play Britney at you over and over again until you confess to crimes you haven&#8217;t committed. I&#8217;m totally ready to move on from nutritionists. But Patrick Holford yesterday found his [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/02/money-is-not-the-only-barrier-to-aids-patients-getting-hold-of-drugs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patrick Holford, solicits wikipedia changes. again. inevitable consequences</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/02/patrick-holford-wikipedia-page-vandalised-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/02/patrick-holford-wikipedia-page-vandalised-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick holford]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patrick Holford has now solicited his subscribers to write positively about him on his wikipedia page, in a mailout earlier today: &#8220;Weirdness on Wikipedia &#8211; Ideally, debates on issues of scientific and medical contention should stick to the facts, but unfortunately those in the front line of paradigm shifts are usually subject to personal attacks, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/02/patrick-holford-wikipedia-page-vandalised-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;My right to be called a nutritionist&#8221; &#8211; Patrick Holford</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/02/my-right-to-be-called-a-nutrionist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/02/my-right-to-be-called-a-nutrionist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick holford]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the letters page today: My right to be called a nutrionist Friday February 16, 2007 The Guardian In Ben Goldacre&#8217;s column on January 6 he once again accuses me of &#8220;bad science&#8221; in reference to a statement in one of my books that &#8220;AZT is potentially harmful and proving less effective than vitamin C&#8221;. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/02/my-right-to-be-called-a-nutrionist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doctoring the records &#8211; Patrick Holford and Fuel PR</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/01/doctoring-the-records/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/01/doctoring-the-records/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 00:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equazen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fish oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel pr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick holford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[references]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read more on &#8220;Professor Patrick Holford&#8221; here, there, here, there, here and here. Ben Goldacre Saturday January 6, 2007 The Guardian It&#8217;s just not cool to anonymously edit your own Wikipedia page. It&#8217;s an online encyclopaedia, free to access, a tribute to the powers of the hive mind, and anyone can edit any page. This [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/01/doctoring-the-records/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I have nothing to declare but my cheekiness</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/05/i-have-nothing-to-declare-but-my-cheekiness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2006/05/i-have-nothing-to-declare-but-my-cheekiness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 01:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dangers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrosensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicalisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick holford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powerwatch - alasdair philips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scare stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[very basic science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Saturday May 20, 2006 The Guardian I am routinely accused, in long and angry letters, of being in the pay of the pharmaceutical industry, the mobile phone industry, and the government. Needless to say I lap it up, and would never engage in similarly ad hominem attacks in return, since critiques of character [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2006/05/i-have-nothing-to-declare-but-my-cheekiness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>120</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

