<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bad Science &#187; Search Results  &#187;  chiropractic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/search/chiropractic/feed/rss2/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The noble and ancient tradition of moron-baiting</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2010/05/the-noble-and-ancient-tradition-of-moron-baiting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2010/05/the-noble-and-ancient-tradition-of-moron-baiting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 22:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heroes of bad science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2010/05/the-noble-and-ancient-tradition-of-moron-baiting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre, The Guardian, Saturday 29 May 2010 This week a man called Martin Gardner died, aged 95. His popular maths column in Scientific American (and 50 books on the subject) spanned the decades, but in 1952 he published a book about pseudoscience, quacks, and credulous journalists. How much do you think has changed over [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2010/05/the-noble-and-ancient-tradition-of-moron-baiting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Libel claimants get what they deserve. So do you.</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2010/04/libel-litigants-get-what-they-deserve-and-so-do-the-public/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2010/04/libel-litigants-get-what-they-deserve-and-so-do-the-public/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal chill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2010/04/libel-litigants-get-what-they-deserve-and-so-do-the-public/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre, The Guardian, Friday 15 April 2010 [Full text at guardian.co.uk, abbreviated in the paper] After 2 years of pursuing one man through the courts, at a cost to him of £200,000 and 2 years work, the British Chiropractic Association yesterday dropped their libel case against science writer Simon Singh. The case was over [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2010/04/libel-litigants-get-what-they-deserve-and-so-do-the-public/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>British Chiropractic Association drops shameful libel case against science writer who criticised them</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2010/04/british-chiropractic-association-drops-shameful-libel-case-against-science-writer-who-criticised-them/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2010/04/british-chiropractic-association-drops-shameful-libel-case-against-science-writer-who-criticised-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal chill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2010/04/british-chiropractic-association-drops-shameful-libel-case-against-science-writer-who-criticised-them/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The BCA have dropped their case. It has not been good for them. It will now get worse. Singh has made it clear that he will pursue them for his costs: this will cost the BCA dearly, and it is money they can ill afford. I’m off to write about it for the Guardian but [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2010/04/british-chiropractic-association-drops-shameful-libel-case-against-science-writer-who-criticised-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Last chance for libel reform: mass lobby of MPs next Tuesday</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2010/03/last-chance-for-libel-reform-mass-lobby-of-mps-next-tuesday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2010/03/last-chance-for-libel-reform-mass-lobby-of-mps-next-tuesday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal chill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2010/03/last-chance-for-libel-reform-mass-lobby-of-mps-next-tuesday/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is your last chance to convince your MP that libel reform is a good idea before parliament dissolves. Politicians can feel like a dispiritingly disengaged shower of till-dippers, but here is one issue that you can care about, and it&#8217;s worth one final stab at making them see sense. Our libel laws stifle critical [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2010/03/last-chance-for-libel-reform-mass-lobby-of-mps-next-tuesday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The year in nonsense</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/the-year-in-nonsense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/the-year-in-nonsense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[annual roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big pharma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/the-year-in-nonsense/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre, The Guardian, Saturday 19 December 2009 It’s been a vintage year for dodgy science in government. We saw reports on cocaine that were disappeared, dodgy evidence to justify DNA retention, and some government advisors who estimated the cost of piracy at 10% of GDP, to media applause, and then failed to tell everyone [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2009/12/the-year-in-nonsense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Behold the jot of evidence</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/10/behold-the-jot-of-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2009/10/behold-the-jot-of-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal chill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=1386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre, Saturday 17 October 2009, The Guardian For those with the finances to try to silence their critics, this has been a week of spectacular own goals. Trafigura has loudly advertised the report on the dumping of toxic waste in Africa by taking out a super-injunction through Carter-Ruck. And on Wednesday Simon Singh, the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2009/10/behold-the-jot-of-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protecting the powerful is a feature, not a bug</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/09/protecting-the-powerful-is-a-feature-not-a-bug/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2009/09/protecting-the-powerful-is-a-feature-not-a-bug/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal chill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/09/protecting-the-powerful-is-a-feature-not-a-bug/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here’s a quick piece about libel that I bashed out on request for CiF, covers ground you’ll have read before but it’s always good to keep libel alive in peoples’ minds. I should also say, I think I was in a bit of a mopey mood when I emailed it from the rail replacement bus [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2009/09/protecting-the-powerful-is-a-feature-not-a-bug/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;We are more possible than you can powerfully imagine&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/07/we-are-more-possible-than-you-can-powerfully-imagine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2009/07/we-are-more-possible-than-you-can-powerfully-imagine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal chill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=1272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian Wednesday 29 July 2009 Today the Australian magazine Cosmos, along with a vast number of other blogs and publications, reprinted an article by Simon Singh, in slightly tweaked form, in an act of solidarity. The British Chiropractic Association has been suing Singh personally for the past 15 months, over a piece [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2009/07/we-are-more-possible-than-you-can-powerfully-imagine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A characteristically amateurish and socially inappropriate approach to pitching an article</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/05/a-characteristically-amateurish-and-socially-inappropriate-approach-to-pitching-an-article/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2009/05/a-characteristically-amateurish-and-socially-inappropriate-approach-to-pitching-an-article/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 17:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal chill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/05/a-characteristically-amateurish-and-socially-inappropriate-approach-to-pitching-an-article/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi there. I’m going to write 800 words on the British Chiropractic Association suing Simon Singh, and the early adjudication on meanings. I’m assuming the Guardian don’t want it, since they apologised over the original piece (let me know if you do, natch, wld love to). If you are some kind of editor, and you [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2009/05/a-characteristically-amateurish-and-socially-inappropriate-approach-to-pitching-an-article/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Talks this week in London, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday..</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/speaking-gigs-this-week-in-london-monday-tuesday-wednesday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/speaking-gigs-this-week-in-london-monday-tuesday-wednesday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 12:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[onanism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/speaking-gigs-this-week-in-london-monday-tuesday-wednesday/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry for the slightly late notice, I&#8217;m doing three talks this week in London, Monday in Holborn in a pub, Tuesday in King&#8217;s Cross in a Library, and Wednesday in Charing Cross Road in a bookshop. Also I&#8217;ve been bullied into making a facebook page which is here: www.new.facebook.com/pages/Ben-Goldacre-Bad-Science/26030473910 I&#8217;ll post upcoming events here, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/speaking-gigs-this-week-in-london-monday-tuesday-wednesday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Silence Dissent!</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2008/08/silence-dissent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2008/08/silence-dissent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 12:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stifling criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2008/08/silence-dissent/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CAM world meets a new all time low this week &#8211; even by their own standards &#8211; as the New Zealand Chiropractors Association threaten the New Zealand Medical Journal with legal action for criticising their ideas and practice. Time and again we see alternative therapists using the law to silence dissent, and to prevent [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2008/08/silence-dissent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When in doubt, call yourself a doctor</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/04/when-in-doubt-call-yourself-a-doctor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2006/04/when-in-doubt-call-yourself-a-doctor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 23:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PhDs, doctors, and qualifications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Saturday April 22, 2006 The Guardian So here&#8217;s a tangled web, and frankly I don&#8217;t think anybody comes out of it looking too good, including me. Yes We Can Cure ADHD, read the Daily Mail last week. Now I know what you&#8217;re thinking. Like a magnificently drunk girlfriend, you&#8217;re shouting: &#8220;Leave it, he&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2006/04/when-in-doubt-call-yourself-a-doctor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reading between the lines</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2004/04/reading-between-the-lines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2004/04/reading-between-the-lines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2004 03:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reading between the lines Talk about Bad science here Ben Goldacre Thursday April 22, 2004 The Guardian Â· There are times when a boy can feel terribly alone. Like when you&#8217;re standing in the medical section of the academic Waterstone&#8217;s in London, and you suddenly realise that you&#8217;re surrounded by people earnestly browsing 100ft of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2004/04/reading-between-the-lines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

