<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bad Science &#187; Search Results  &#187;  observer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/search/observer/feed/rss2/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Jeremy Laurance gets angry about scrutiny for journalists&#8217; claims</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2010/06/jeremy-laurance-is-an-angry-man/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2010/06/jeremy-laurance-is-an-angry-man/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 14:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=1682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You might be amused by this piece from the Independent&#8217;s health reporter Jeremy Laurance today. It&#8217;s about what a bad man I am for pointing out when science and health journalists get things wrong. Alongside the lengthy ad hominem &#8211; a matter of taste for you &#8211; there are a number of mistakes and, more [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2010/06/jeremy-laurance-is-an-angry-man/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fish oil in the Observer: the return of a $2bn friend</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2010/06/the-return-of-a-2bn-fishy-friend/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2010/06/the-return-of-a-2bn-fishy-friend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 23:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fish oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=1675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre, The Guardian, Saturday 5 June 2010 &#8220;Fish oil helps schoolchildren to concentrate” was the headline in the Observer. Regular readers will remember the omega-3 fish oil pill issue, as the entire British news media has been claiming for several years now that there are trials showing it improves school performance and behaviour in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2010/06/the-return-of-a-2bn-fishy-friend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;We are more possible than you can powerfully imagine&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/07/we-are-more-possible-than-you-can-powerfully-imagine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2009/07/we-are-more-possible-than-you-can-powerfully-imagine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal chill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=1272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian Wednesday 29 July 2009 Today the Australian magazine Cosmos, along with a vast number of other blogs and publications, reprinted an article by Simon Singh, in slightly tweaked form, in an act of solidarity. The British Chiropractic Association has been suing Singh personally for the past 15 months, over a piece [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2009/07/we-are-more-possible-than-you-can-powerfully-imagine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New cheap paperback edition of Bad Science is out now</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2009/04/new-cheap-paperback-edition-of-bad-science-is-out-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2009/04/new-cheap-paperback-edition-of-bad-science-is-out-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2009/04/new-cheap-paperback-edition-of-bad-science-is-out-now/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just so that your visual search strategy is correctly callibrated for bookshops and friends&#8217; living rooms, here is the cover of the new and cheaper edition of Bad Science. It features both an index and a new chapter, which I will post for free on the web in a minute. More below. If you&#8217;re wondering [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2009/04/new-cheap-paperback-edition-of-bad-science-is-out-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Self-indulgent retrospective &#8211; 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/12/the-year-in-bad-science-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/12/the-year-in-bad-science-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian, Saturday December 29 2007 Nobody listens to a word I say: I’ve been saying it for so long now that I think I’d be sorry if they did. Scaremongering season kicked off with the Panorama WiFi special. Among its many crimes against sense, this program featured “independent testing” by &#8211; oh, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/12/the-year-in-bad-science-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stylish correction from the Observer readers&#8217; editor</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/10/stylish-correction-from-the-observer-readers-editor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/10/stylish-correction-from-the-observer-readers-editor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[danie krugel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went to a lecture by the Freakonomics guys a while ago, and someone asked about the routine inaccuracy of news stories in the media. Look, said one of them (although I&#8217;ve got no idea who): the thing about journalism is, people expect it to be a true account of the world, but we&#8217;ve forgotten [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/10/stylish-correction-from-the-observer-readers-editor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After Madeleine, why not Bin Laden?</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/10/after-madeleine-why-not-bin-laden/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/10/after-madeleine-why-not-bin-laden/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 23:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[badscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dna]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian Saturday October 13 2007 Danie Krugel is an ex-policeman in South Africa who believes he can pinpoint the location of missing people anywhere on the map. He does this by using his special magic box, which works through something to do with &#8220;quantum physics&#8221;, but you aren&#8217;t allowed to know any [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/10/after-madeleine-why-not-bin-laden/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Danie Krugel: can you please call me?</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/10/danie-krugel-can-you-please-call-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/10/danie-krugel-can-you-please-call-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 22:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m trying to get in touch with Danie Krugel, following his dramatic discovery of forensic evidence in the Madeleine McCann case, as reported in the Observer. To be honest, I&#8217;m a bit disappointed he hasn&#8217;t spookily contacted me on my private mobile number already, as this blogger reported recently in a totally excellent posting: moonflake.wordpress.com/2007/01/09/danie-krugel-first-contact/ [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/10/danie-krugel-can-you-please-call-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Madeleine McCann, the Observer, and their special magic quantum DNA box (with secret energy source)</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/10/the-observer-and-their-special-magic-box/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/10/the-observer-and-their-special-magic-box/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 12:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Madeleine McCann is a 4 year old girl who went missing from her parents&#8217; holiday hotel room in Portugal 5 months ago. Danie Krugel is an ex-policeman in South Africa who believes he can pinpoint the location of missing people anywhere in the world. He does this using his special magic box, which works by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/10/the-observer-and-their-special-magic-box/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Observer MMR story disappears from archives &#8211; updated</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/observer-mmr-story-disappears-from-archives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/observer-mmr-story-disappears-from-archives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MMR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lots of people have emailed in to say that the Observer&#8217;s spectacularly misleading MMR story has been removed from the archive and is no longer available online. observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,2121521,00.html For obvious reasons of propriety I have studiously avoided having an inside track on anything to do with this piece from the beginning, so I have no [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/observer-mmr-story-disappears-from-archives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Observer makes another hash of &#8220;clarifying&#8221; and persists in trying to cover up its mistakes</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/the-observer-makes-a-slightly-better-job-of-clarifying/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/the-observer-makes-a-slightly-better-job-of-clarifying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 23:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MMR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They still don&#8217;t seem to understand the problems with the one in 58 figure, and they still don&#8217;t seem to be able to understand the report they keep going on about (but won&#8217;t let anyone see because they think their scientific evidence is top secret), and they are still covering up their mistakes. At first, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/the-observer-makes-a-slightly-better-job-of-clarifying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MMR and The Observer &#8211; a nation waits</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/mmr-and-the-observer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/mmr-and-the-observer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 22:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MMR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been told by Dr Fiona Scott that the main news editor of the Observer phoned her today, and she has been promised that there will be a large article in tomorrow&#8217;s Observer [EDIT it's up now, here] reproducing in full and unedited the comments that she ended up posting, in desperation, in the commentisefree [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/mmr-and-the-observer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MMR: the scare stories are back</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/british-medical-journal-mmr-the-scare-stories-are-back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/british-medical-journal-mmr-the-scare-stories-are-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 02:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s my piece from the British Medical Journal, or at least the last version I saw of it. Medicine and the media Ben Goldacre doctor and writer, London, Guardian and BMJ columnist ben@badscience.net DOI 10.1136/bmj.39280.447419.59 www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/bmj.39280.447419.59 A UK newspaper has once again linked autism with MMR and sparked a spate of media scaremongering. But the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/british-medical-journal-mmr-the-scare-stories-are-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The MMR story that wasn&#8217;t</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/the-mmr-story-that-wasnt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/the-mmr-story-that-wasnt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MMR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bad science Ben Goldacre Wednesday July 18, 2007 The Guardian Whatever you think about Andrew Wakefield, the real villains of the MMR scandal are the media. Just one week before his GMC hearing, yet another factless &#8220;MMR causes autism&#8221; news story appeared: and even though it ran on the front page of our very own [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/the-mmr-story-that-wasnt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I am not unwell</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/i-am-not-unwell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/i-am-not-unwell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 00:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for your emails, I am not unwell, nor have I died &#8220;in a strange sexual experiment that went horribly wrong&#8221;. As people suspected I was hoping to write about the Observer&#8217;s astonishing front page story on MMR, in fact I was hoping to do it for the comment pages last weds, but then [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/i-am-not-unwell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Try Me, Sh*thead&#8221; &#8211; the strange case of Carol Stott, Wakefield, and the Observer &#8211; including bizarre update</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/try-me-shithead-the-strange-case-of-stott-wakefield-and-the-observer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/try-me-shithead-the-strange-case-of-stott-wakefield-and-the-observer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 13:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scare stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update 10:30pm Sunday 8/7/07: Just got this reply from Dr Scott, in response to my email below: she seems to say the Observer have concocted something, but it&#8217;s certainly vague. Have asked her for clarification, but no response (still none as of 17:15 9/7/07 despite various emails and phone call). [i should clarify that sincec [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/try-me-shithead-the-strange-case-of-stott-wakefield-and-the-observer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perpetual truths</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/steorn-perpetual-motion-machine-demo-fails-astonishingly-to-materialise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/steorn-perpetual-motion-machine-demo-fails-astonishingly-to-materialise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 00:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perpetual motion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Saturday July 7, 2007 The Guardian You might remember an Irish company called Steorn: in August 2006 they took out a full page advert in the Economist to announce that they had discovered a source of free energy, a perpetual motion machine no less, in triumphant defiance of that stuffy first law of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/steorn-perpetual-motion-machine-demo-fails-astonishingly-to-materialise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insert &#8220;swindle&#8221; joke here.</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/03/insert-swindle-gag-here/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/03/insert-swindle-gag-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 00:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Thursday night, Channel 4 broadcast what it described as a &#8220;controversial documentary&#8221;. It was essentially the same rather elderly climate denialist arguments that have been seen many times before &#8211; and assessed, and refuted &#8211; but packaged up with a bit of drama, as if they were new and unheard of. That wasn&#8217;t the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/03/insert-swindle-gag-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>152</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World Wide Weirdness Shootout &#8211; updated</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/01/world-wide-weirdness-shootout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/01/world-wide-weirdness-shootout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 01:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matthias rath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scare stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2007/01/world-wide-weirdness-shootout/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Saturday January 27, 2007 The Guardian I&#8217;m not a complicated man &#8211; as my girlfriend could happily tell you &#8211; but I do get a bit worried about these stories I&#8217;ve been emailed, where African people say something stupid about the science of Aids and we all laugh at them. To be fair, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/01/world-wide-weirdness-shootout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Quantitative Analysis Of The Frequency With Which One Company Is Promoted, And  By Whom, In UK National Newspapers UPDATED 30/9/06</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/09/a-quantitative-analysis-of-the-frequency-with-which-one-company-is-promoted-and-by-whom-in-uk-national-newspapers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2006/09/a-quantitative-analysis-of-the-frequency-with-which-one-company-is-promoted-and-by-whom-in-uk-national-newspapers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telegraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A Quantitative Analysis Of The Frequency With Which One Company Is Promoted, And By Whom, In UK National Newspapers&#8221; Updated 16th September 2006. Dr Ben Goldacre (Corresponding Author) Bad Science Research Institute, www.badscience.net ben@badscience.net Introduction. Susan Clark is an alternative therapy columnist who recently made a cheeky attack on her critics. It was subsequently noted [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2006/09/a-quantitative-analysis-of-the-frequency-with-which-one-company-is-promoted-and-by-whom-in-uk-national-newspapers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

