<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bad Science &#187; Search Results  &#187;  panorama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badscience.net/search/panorama/feed/rss2/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badscience.net</link>
	<description>Ben Goldacre&#039;s Bad Science column from the Guardian and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Self-indulgent retrospective &#8211; 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/12/the-year-in-bad-science-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/12/the-year-in-bad-science-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre The Guardian, Saturday December 29 2007 Nobody listens to a word I say: I’ve been saying it for so long now that I think I’d be sorry if they did. Scaremongering season kicked off with the Panorama WiFi special. Among its many crimes against sense, this program featured “independent testing” by &#8211; oh, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/12/the-year-in-bad-science-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBC Editorial Complaints Unit debags the Panorama WiFi scare</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/bbc-editorial-complaints-unit-debags-the-panorama-wifi-scare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/bbc-editorial-complaints-unit-debags-the-panorama-wifi-scare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 23:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrosensitivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/bbc-editorial-complaints-unit-debags-the-panorama-wifi-scare/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You will remember Panorama&#8217;s WiFi program very clearly. Even the children in the school where they tried to film it spotted the problems with their methodology, and they were promptly booted out by a science teacher. I for one found those two little details truly mood enhancing, and you can read the full story here [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/bbc-editorial-complaints-unit-debags-the-panorama-wifi-scare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Essex electrosensitivity study results&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/essex-electrosensitivity-study-results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/essex-electrosensitivity-study-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrosensitivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; and they&#8217;re negative. Subjects were unable to distinguish whether the signal was present or absent. It is truly fantastic that for almost the first time ever the discussion around electrosensitivity is actually addressing the evidence, rather than anecdote. Cue a barrage of abuse from the electrosensitive lobby. I&#8217;ll be updating as responses from lobbyi$ts [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/essex-electrosensitivity-study-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>162</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Updated with lobby feedback &#8211; A thought experiment for the electrosensitivity lobby</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/a-thought-experiment-for-the-electrosensitivity-lobby/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/a-thought-experiment-for-the-electrosensitivity-lobby/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrosensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powerwatch - alasdair philips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The electrosensitivity lobby are famously selective about the evidence they quote. They simply ignore the large body of data finding that electrosensitivity symptoms are not worsened by e-m waves, and they selectively quote only data which supports their hypothesis, in a pattern which can be seen throughout the internet. I fear this may mislead their [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/07/a-thought-experiment-for-the-electrosensitivity-lobby/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cherry Picking and the Professional Association of Teachers</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/06/cherry-picking-and-the-professional-association-of-teachers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/06/cherry-picking-and-the-professional-association-of-teachers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrosensitivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s a small thing, but if Wi-Fi and reality editing interest you, then here is a quick letter I just pinged off. Before you accuse me of being a little too interested, I can write veeeery quickly, and this kind of phenomenon really does fascinate me. Dear Professional Association of Teachers, I have just received [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/06/cherry-picking-and-the-professional-association-of-teachers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BMJ Column &#8211; Why don&#8217;t journalists mention the data?</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/06/bmj-column-why-dont-journalists-mention-the-data/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/06/bmj-column-why-dont-journalists-mention-the-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrosensitivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BMJ 2007;334:1249 (16 June) doi:10.1136/bmj.39245.510718.59 Observations Media watch Why don&#8217;t journalists mention the data? Have stories about &#8220;electrosensitivity&#8221; simply been lifted from those promoting this new diagnosis? Sometimes, as a doctor who also writes in the newspapers, a dark thought comes across me: wouldn&#8217;t it be so refreshing -secretly, wouldn&#8217;t it feel so free &#8211; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/06/bmj-column-why-dont-journalists-mention-the-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Electrosensitives: the new cash cow of the woo industry</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/06/electrosensitives-the-new-cash-cow-of-the-woo-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/06/electrosensitives-the-new-cash-cow-of-the-woo-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 00:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrosensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick holford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powerwatch - alasdair philips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scare stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Saturday June 2, 2007 The Guardian The Independent has put its green columnist Julia Stephenson on to Panorama&#8217;s Wi-Fi scare story: a charming green party candidate and beef heiress living in Chelsea on a trust fund, who believes her symptoms of tiredness and headache are caused by electromagnetic radiation from phones and Wi-Fi. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/06/electrosensitives-the-new-cash-cow-of-the-woo-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>125</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wi-Fi Wants To Kill Your Children&#8230; But Alasdair Philips of Powerwatch sells the cure!</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/so-simple-a-child-could-spot-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/so-simple-a-child-could-spot-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 23:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrosensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powerwatch - alasdair philips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scare stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[very basic science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello visitors from boingboing/slashdot. I&#8217;m a doctor and I write in the Guardian and the BMJ about quackery, health scares, and pseudoscience in the media. Ben Goldacre Saturday May 26, 2007 The Guardian Won&#8217;t somebody, please, think of the children? Three weeks ago I received my favourite email of all time, from a science teacher. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/so-simple-a-child-could-spot-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>161</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Kenyon from BBC Panorama Responds on Wi-Fi Scare</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/paul-kenyon-from-panorama-responds-on-wi-fi-scare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/paul-kenyon-from-panorama-responds-on-wi-fi-scare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 19:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrosensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powerwatch - alasdair philips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scare stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve just been sent this by the BBC publicity office, it is a response from Paul Kenyon, the presenter of the show, and very nice chap too. He is talking about the posts here and here. And remember &#8211; by the miracle of the interweb &#8211; this is the show he is talking about. Hi [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/paul-kenyon-from-panorama-responds-on-wi-fi-scare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amusing Leaked Letter &#8211; BBC Panorama Wi-Fi &#8211; now updated with further response from BBC</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/leaked-letter-bbc-panorama-wi-fi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/leaked-letter-bbc-panorama-wi-fi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 16:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrosensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powerwatch - alasdair philips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This has fallen into my hands. It is &#8211; I am informed &#8211; the letter that the BBC complaints people are planning to send to people if they complain about the ludicrous Panorama Wi-Fi show from Monday, featuring Alasdair Philips and electromagnetic hypersensitivity. I thought it might amuse you to know that it has apparently [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/leaked-letter-bbc-panorama-wi-fi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBC Panorama on WiFi &#8211; Updated with response from Panorama presenter Paul Kenyon</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/bbc-panorama-on-wifi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/bbc-panorama-on-wifi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 23:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrosensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powerwatch - alasdair philips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have to skip through 2 minutes of Eastenders to get to it&#8230; . &#8220;Discuss&#8221;. I haven&#8217;t got time right now to go forensic on its ass right now, but there is a lot to be concerned about in this show. For example, the discussion on &#8220;electrohypersensitivity&#8221; rather neglected this kind of material: www.badscience.net/?p=239 And [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/bbc-panorama-on-wifi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Academics are as guilty as the media when it comes to publication bias</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/academics-are-as-guilty-as-the-media-when-it-comes-to-publication-bias/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/academics-are-as-guilty-as-the-media-when-it-comes-to-publication-bias/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 07:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[references]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulating research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scare stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Saturday June 10, 2006 The Guardian When I am finally assassinated by an axe-wielding electrosensitive homeopathic anti-vaccine campaigner &#8211; and that day surely cannot be far off now &#8211; I should like to be remembered, primarily, for my childishness and immaturity. Occasionally, however, I like to write about serious issues. And I don&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2006/06/academics-are-as-guilty-as-the-media-when-it-comes-to-publication-bias/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And now the news</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2006/05/and-now-the-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2006/05/and-now-the-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2006 16:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Goldacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrosensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scare stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badscience.net/?p=237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Saturday May 6, 2006 The Guardian And now here&#8217;s the news they didn&#8217;t tell you. You might remember the scare stories about mercury fillings from the past two decades: they come around every few years, usually accompanied by a personal anecdote, where fatigue, dizziness and headaches are all vanquished with the removal of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badscience.net/2006/05/and-now-the-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

