Am I misunderstanding something, or is this paper both stupid AND racist?

August 9th, 2007 by Ben Goldacre in bad science, mondo academico | 63 Comments »

Okay now look. I realise that political correctness has made it difficult to talk around some issues involving race, biology, and culture. I realise that some subjects have been effectively closed to discussion, under fear of accusations of racism. I don’t want to throw these accusations around wildly.

But can somebody please tell me what possible good there is to be found in this paper from the journal Medical Hypotheses, founded by controversialist David Horrobin:

“Down subjects and Oriental population share several specific attitudes and characteristics”
Federica Mafrica and Vincenzo Fodale.
Medical Hypotheses (2007) 69, 438–440
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2006.12.043

The central thrust of their argument is that people with Down’s Syndrome have a lot in common with people from oriental countries.

Here are some examples of the impressive evidence they have amassed to support their argument.

Another aspect of Down person that remind the
Asiatic population, are alimentary characteristics.
Down subjects adore having several dishes displayed
on the table and have a propensity for food
which is rich in monosodium glutamate

I am being deadly serious. This is a proper academic journal, published by exarms dealers Elsevier, which I myself have read in the Radcliffe Science Library in Oxford.

They go on:

The tendencies of Down subjects to carry out
recreative-reabilitative activities, such as embroi-
dery, wicker-working ceramics, book-binding, etc.,
that is renowned, remind the Chinese hand-crafts,
which need a notable ability, such as Chinese vases
or the use of chop-sticks employed for eating by
Asiatic populations.

I see no evidence anywhere that this is a spoof.

Some attitudes and any daily habitus observed in
Down subjects, recall those of the oriental
population.

Down persons during waiting periods, when they
get tired of standing up straight, crouch, squatting
down, reminding us of the ‘‘squatting’’ position
described by medical semeiotic which helps the venous
return. They remain in this position for several
minutes and only to rest themselves this
position is the same taken by the Vietnamese, the
Thai, the Cambodian, the Chinese, while they are
waiting at a the bus stop, for instance, or while
they are chatting.

There is another pose taken by Down subjects
while they are sitting on a chair: they sit with their
legs crossed while they are eating, writing, watching
TV, as the Oriental peoples do.

Now I don’t want to be unfair. I just don’t know what to make of all this. Medical Hypotheses has legendarily published some pretty far out work, but it has an admirable manifesto:

Medical Hypotheses is a forum for ideas in medicine and related biomedical sciences. It will publish interesting and important theoretical papers that foster the diversity and debate upon which the scientific process thrives.

It’s edited by Bruce Charlton, a reader in evolutionary psychiatry at Newcastle, and the editorial board is impressive, including Antonio Damasio, Roy Calne, and others.

Being entirely serious, something about this paper really does make me feel quite uncomfortable. The only way I can feel safe about it is to post the full text here, so you can make your own minds up about it. I would be particularly interested to hear what the Down’s Syndrome Assocation and the Chinese and Japanese embassies have to say on the subject. In fact ‘d be interested to hear what this chap has to say about it too.

Ooh, and in case you forgot: Positive Internet are gods.

Down subjects and Oriental population share
several specific attitudes and characteristics q
Federica Mafrica 1, Vincenzo Fodale *,2
Department of Neuroscience, Psychiatric and Anesthesiological Sciences, University of Messina,
Policlinico Universitario ‘‘G.Martino’’, Via Consolare Valeria, 98125 Messina, Italy
Received 28 November 2006; accepted 18 December 2006
Summary Down’s syndrome is characterized not only by a typical ‘‘habitus’’, mental retardation of variable gravity and several alterations of the cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrenteric and immunitary system, but also by specific attitudes and characteristics that are in common with the Oriental population. Starting from the origin of the term mongolism, replaced with other terms such as Trisomy 21, Down’s syndrome, and anomaly of Down because of the racist use made in the last century, we propose, in the light of modern knowledge about the heredity of features, a reflection on those aspects and attitudes which highlight a very particular twinning between a Down person and Asiatic peoples.

Introduction
Down’s syndrome is a condition characterized by a
typical ‘‘habitus’’ and a mental retardation of variable
gravity. The face is oriental: the fissures of
eyes are oblique and present the epicantus; the
nose is short and the root is flat, the knape of the
neck is flat and covered with very loose skin and
subcutaneous. The limbs are short and stocky and
a marked laxity of ligaments is present. Several
alterations of the cardiovascular, respiratory,
gastrenteric and immunitary system can be associated.
In addition, specific attitudes and characteristics
may be shown evidences.
Origin of term ‘‘Mongolism’’
The first description of Down’s syndrome dates
back to 1846 when Seguin [1] spoke about a ‘‘furfuraceous
cretinism’’. In 1866 John Langdon Haydon
Down published an ethnic classification of idiotis.
In this classification, the author distinguished the
idiotis according to an ethnic typology: the Ethiopic,
the Caucasian, the mongoloid. Therefore for
the first time the term ‘‘mongolism’’ appeared [2].

Today this syndrome is nominated with other
terms such as Trisomy 21, Down’s syndrome, anomaly
of Down.
Down peoples and Asiatic peoples
The strong characteristic, that leads Langdon to
compare the Down population to the Asiatic one,
is the eyes with a typical almond-form. However,
it is possible to highlight other aspects of Down
subjects which remind the Asiatic population, such
as fine and straight hair, the distribution of apparatus
piliferous, which appears to be sparse.
Some attitudes and any daily habitus observed in
Down subjects, recall those of the oriental
population.
Down persons during waiting periods, when they
get tired of standing up straight, crouch, squatting
down, reminding us of the ‘‘squatting’’ position
described by medical semeiotic which helps the venous
return. They remain in this position for several
minutes and only to rest themselves this
position is the same taken by the Vietnamese, the
Thai, the Cambodian, the Chinese, while they are
waiting at a the bus stop, for instance, or while
they are chatting.
There is another pose taken by Down subjects
while they are sitting on a chair: they sit with their
legs crossed while they are eating, writing, watching
TV, as the Oriental peoples do.
Another aspect of Down person that remind the
Asiatic population, are alimentary characteristics.
Down subjects adore having several dishes displayed
on the table and have a propensity for food
which is rich in monosodium glutamate (a salt of
glutamate), such as parmigiano, beef broth, tinned
food, etc. [3]. The Chinese food abounds in monosodium
glutamate that seems to be responsible for
the fifth taste or ‘‘umami taste’’ [4] and of the
‘‘Chinese restaurant syndrome’’ [5], (a syndrome
characterized by flushing, tightness and breathing-
difficulties). Furthermore, it has been observed
that Down subjects present a deficit of GABA transmission
due to a higher consumption of glutamate.
In fact, it seems that a biological limit keeps the
brain of Down individuals from having too much
glucose, by acting on its intake. Glucose is a precursor
of l-glutamate acid via the Kreb’s cycle
and glutamatic acid, in its turn, is the precursor
of GABA [6].
The incidence of thyroid disease in the Down
population is another aspect that may be highlighted
since it recall the Asiatic population. In
fact, thyroid disorders are common in the Down’s
syndrome. The prevalence of hypothyroidism has
been found to be greater than that of hyperthyroidism.
Hypothyroidism may be either present from
birth or be acquired [7].
In several studies about the incidence of thyroid
disorders in the Asiatic populations, childhood
Grave’s disease has been reported to be rare, but
epidemiological data showed to be higher in Hong
Kong children [8]. Another study observed that
one large Chinese family harboured susceptibility
loci for autoimmune thyroid disease which is distinct
from those previously found in the Caucasian
population. This suggests that different susceptibility
loci exist between different ethnic groups
[9].
The tendencies of Down subjects to carry out
recreative–reabilitative activities, such as embroidery,
wicker-working ceramics, book-binding, etc.,
that is renowned, remind the Chinese hand-crafts,
which need a notable ability, such as Chinese vases
or the use of chop-sticks employed for eating by
Asiatic populations.
Perhaps the explanation for their capacities resides
in the monkey-like cast of the hand or rather
in the single transversal solcus that replaces the
normal creases of the flexion of the hand, and their
laxity of ligaments. Also this characteristic of the
Down syndrome may be considered a point in common
with oriental populations.
The trisomy-16 murine, a biological model,
could be utilized to understand the molecular and
developmental effects associated with abnormal
chromosome numbers. In fact, the distal segment
of murine chromosome-16 is homologous to nearly
the entire long arm of human chromosome-21 [10].
Conclusion
These observations might highlight very interesting
aspects connected to the supernumerary chromosome
21 in Down’s syndrome, whereas they are
natural features of Asians. It would be just as interesting
to understand why the chromosome should
be in triple copy to express ‘‘these coincidences’’
in the Down subject, whereas it is sufficient in double
copy in Asians, who do not show mental retardation
or malformation in various organs or
systems.
Furthermore, it may be interesting to know the
gravity with which the Downs syndrome occurs in
Asiatic population, especially in Chinese population.
This study may offer the possibility of to know
better the neuropathology mechanisms that are
responsible of mental retardation in Downs syn-
drome and to open a new diagnostic and therapeutic
way for to operate precociously.
Perhaps we could even clear Langdon of all
blame from the accusation of being a ‘‘racist’’
for having first observed a sort of twinning which
could be looked at in more depth in the light of
modern knowledge on the heredity of features
and on genic expression and inactivation.
References
[1] Seguin E. Idiocy and its treatment by physiological methods.
New York: William Wood; 1866.
[2] Langdon-Down J. Observation on an ethnic classification of
idiots. London Hospital Reports 1866;3:259–62.
[3] Cocchi R. Food habits in Down of 10 years or more. Int
J Intellect Impair 1994;7:149–57.
[4] de Araujio IE, Kringelbach ML, Rolls ET, Hobden P.
Representation of umami taste in the Human brain.
J Neurophysiol 2003;90:313–9.
[5] Keney RA. The Chinese restaurant syndrome: anecdote
revisited. Food Chem Toxicol 1986;24:351–4.
[6] Cocchi R. Precursori dell’ac. Glutammico e del GABA
e abitudini alimentari nei Down: Indagine epidemiologica
su 460 soggetti. Int J Intellect Impair 1990;3:
307–12.
[7] Prasher VP. Down sindrome and thyroid disorder: a review.
Down Syndr Res Pract 1999;6:25–42.
[8] Wong GW, Cheng PS. Increasing incidence pf childhood
Graves’ disease in Hong Kong: a follow-up study. Clin
Endocrinol (Oxf.) 2001;54:547–50.
[9] Villanueva R, Tomer Y, Greenberg DA, et al. Autoimmune
thyroid disease susceptibility loci in a large Chinese family.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf.) 2002;56:45–51.
[10] Galdzicki Z, Siarey RJ. Understanding mental retardation in
Down’s syndrome using trisomy 16 mouse models. Genes
Brain Behav 2003;2(3):167–78.


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
If you like what I do, and you want me to do more, you can: buy my books Bad Science and Bad Pharma, give them to your friends, put them on your reading list, employ me to do a talk, or tweet this article to your friends. Thanks! ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

63 Responses



  1. Evilsteve said,

    August 2, 2007 at 11:45 am

    Sorry that should be “(like a Muslim)”.

    It still can only mean one thing.

  2. Ginger Yellow said,

    August 2, 2007 at 11:49 am

    What the hell is an evolutionary psychiatrist?

  3. calvin said,

    August 2, 2007 at 1:12 pm

    Reconstructions of trousers from the dark ages (based on grave finds) indicate that their difference in construction from modern trousers was necessary because the vast majority of work during this period was done in a squatting position. Dark age trousers have a panel sewn into the backside that is absent in modern design. Chairs seem to be a product of urbanisation.

  4. GoldenNinjaWarrior said,

    August 2, 2007 at 1:48 pm

    Obviously this paper is total guff with not a hint of science contained within.

    I do worry, however, about who is being offended. Is it offensive to Asian people because Downs persons are somehow inferior to ‘normal’ people?

    This ‘paper’ achieves nothing and is full of offence in that it stereotypes whole groups of people. Stereotyping is almost always offensive.

    I don’t think, however, that claiming the comparison is offensive to Asian people is anything other than being offensive to Downs people.

  5. RS said,

    August 2, 2007 at 7:02 pm

    “If IQ tests weren’t a valid test of intelligence wouldn’t it be the case that a random testing of people who work in jobs that are generally associated with high intelligence…”

    Not necessarily. Performance on an English GCSE might well correlate with mathematical ability, even though it is not a valid test of mathematical ability per se – correlations, particularly weak correlations, do not imply that you have a good measure of something. Conversely, even if it is a good measure, you might be restricting the range because everyone in the field has to have an IQ above X, but after that you have both a restricted range of IQs (thus getting a reduced correlation) and maybe other skills (say in science, self promotion) are more important within that population once they have demonstrated a requisite degree of ability (in say maths).

    “Also, not a single one of him drinks alcohol like a Muslim.”

    Lots of people with Down’s that I know drink alcohol – are you sure you aren’t thinking of children with Down’s?

  6. Pro-reason said,

    August 3, 2007 at 7:53 am

    A rather obvious flaw, which no one seems to have pointed out, is that they go on and on about “Asians” and “Asiatics”, and yet it is clear that they actually mean Oriental people.

    It’s like writing a paper on how “mammals” purr, when you actually meant to talk about cats.

  7. jessina said,

    August 3, 2007 at 5:03 pm

    argh sorry to return so late the fray! I do believe that intelligence is, to a certain extent, heridtary. But there are so many different types of intelligence..people who are good at maths but awful at English and vice versa. Or highly articulate people who cannot understand science. I describe people as ‘intelligent’ or ‘thick’ but tuese are hardly accurate assessments of people’s true abilities. I still do not agree that there is one, set measure of intelligence that can be divined in some sort of standardised test.

  8. nekomatic said,

    August 6, 2007 at 1:15 pm

    “If IQ tests weren’t a valid test of intelligence wouldn’t it be the case that a random testing of people who work in jobs that are generally associated with high intelligence (scientist, etc.) would find no general correlation of professional status and high IQ?”

    If wearing a suit wasn’t a valid measure of high intelligence wouldn’t it be the case that a random testing of people who work in jobs that are generally associated with high intelligence (scientist, etc.) would find no general correlation of professional status and wearing a suit?

    If I haven’t not failed to figure out your multiple negatives incorrectly, then no, this is a schoolboy correlation/causation error: wearing a suit is not a valid measure of “intelligence” and neither is success in IQ tests, although both of them may correlate with professional status…

  9. stevejones123 said,

    August 7, 2007 at 4:39 pm

    I reckon the article is a deliberate spoof written by someone who wished to discredit the journal, in which endeavour he has succeeded admirably.

  10. atavachron said,

    August 12, 2007 at 12:14 am

    I thought Down’s syndrome was an error in replication of the 21st chromosome (trisomy). I don’t think an extra chromosome would make me Chinese. Maybe they’re confounding the old-fashioned term ‘mongoloid’ with ‘mongolian’. Or maybe they’re just twats.

  11. Zorn said,

    August 12, 2007 at 12:38 am

    36. Gimpy- It’s not so much the idea of the scienfic validity with this garbage and the Ashkenazi paper. Hell, I really think the Cochran/Harpending piece is true. It’s just that, regardless of scientific validity, at it’s heart, it’s no different from the Bell Curve, no different from Rushton’s work, no different from any other racialist pieces out there, and yet…. There was hardly a wimper of dissent. Granted, doing a google search on “ashkenazi intelligence” brings you alot of various different online media outlets that just take an agnostic tone, along with various GNXP community sites that hook up with eachother, and about a third being random articles involving Israeli politics, but jesus….

    Pinker latched onto it. It got a treatment in the Economicist. It got an applauding frontpage piece in New York Magazine. I’m glad it wasn’t met with insane condemnation like the Bell Curve or Rushton’s work, but people basically LAUDED IT. Am I REALLY the only one who’s distrubted by this? Disgusted? The air of encouragement that met it? I hope to god not. I’m honestly scared with the way the intellectual community is heading when things like that are now met with these kind of responses.

  12. Pennant said,

    August 17, 2007 at 3:36 pm

    Reminds me of The Onion – “DNA Evidence Frees Man From Zoo” where a man was mistaken for a giraffe.

    Understandable considering both have one head, have to bend down to drink from a pond and are afraid of lions etc.

    tinyurl.com/2cjbtt

  13. diudiu said,

    December 21, 2009 at 6:04 am

    links of london links of london
    links london links london
    links of london jewellery links of london jewellery
    links of london sale links of london sale
    links london sale links london sale
    links of london bracelet links of london bracelet
    links of london charms links of london charms
    links of london necklace links of london necklace
    links of london bangle links of london bangle
    links of london earrings links of london earrings
    links of london ring links of london ring